• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

G8 筛查工具自评版本的开发。

Development of a self-reported version of the G8 screening tool.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov;10(6):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.011
PMID:31477512
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The G8 is a widely used frailty screening tool in patients with cancer that was designed to be completed by healthcare professionals. A patient-reported version would enable a broader application. Aim of this study was to develop a self-reported version of the G8 and to assess its agreement with the original G8.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A self-reported version of the G8 was developed with the aid of communication specialists. Patients aged ≥ 70 years from two different study populations were included: 1. Patients with cancer and 2. Patients visiting the geriatric outpatient clinic. The original G8 was completed by an oncology nurse or clinical research assistant and patients completed the self-reported G8. Patients were blinded to results of the original G8. Kappas were calculated to measure the agreement between the self-reported and original G8 for both the individual items as well as for the cut-off for potential frailty (≤14).

RESULTS

161 patients participated, of whom 104 had cancer (65%). Patients with cancer more frequently completed all items than geriatric patients (all items completed in 94% versus 72%, p < 0.001). The agreement for potential frailty was substantial for patients with cancer (Kappa 0.63) and poor for geriatric patients (Kappa 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Completion of the self-reported G8 is feasible and agreement of its outcome with the original G8 outcome is sufficient for patients with cancer but not for geriatric patients. The self-reported G8 may therefore be a useful alternative to the original G8 in older patients with cancer.

摘要

简介

G8 是一种广泛应用于癌症患者的衰弱筛查工具,旨在由医疗保健专业人员完成。患者报告版本将能够更广泛地应用。本研究旨在开发 G8 的自评版本,并评估其与原始 G8 的一致性。

材料和方法

在沟通专家的帮助下,开发了 G8 的自评版本。纳入了来自两个不同研究人群的年龄≥70 岁的患者:1. 癌症患者和 2. 老年门诊就诊患者。由肿瘤护士或临床研究助理完成原始 G8,患者完成自评 G8。患者对原始 G8 的结果不知情。计算 Kappa 值以衡量自评 G8 和原始 G8 在单个项目以及潜在衰弱的截止值(≤14)之间的一致性。

结果

共有 161 名患者参与,其中 104 名患有癌症(65%)。癌症患者比老年患者更频繁地完成所有项目(所有项目完成率为 94%比 72%,p<0.001)。癌症患者的潜在衰弱的一致性较高(Kappa 值为 0.63),而老年患者的一致性较差(Kappa 值为 0.05)。

结论

自评 G8 的完成是可行的,其结果与原始 G8 结果的一致性对于癌症患者是足够的,但对于老年患者则不然。因此,自评 G8 可能是老年癌症患者替代原始 G8 的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Development of a self-reported version of the G8 screening tool.G8 筛查工具自评版本的开发。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov;10(6):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
Preoperative frailty assessment with the Robinson Frailty Score, Edmonton Frail Scale, and G8 and adverse postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients with cancer.术前使用 Robinson 衰弱评分、埃德蒙顿衰弱量表和 G8 评估衰弱状况与老年癌症手术患者术后不良结局的关系。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;47(4):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
An evaluation of postoperative outcomes and treatment changes after frailty screening and geriatric assessment and management in a cohort of older patients with colorectal cancer.对一组老年结直肠癌患者进行衰弱筛查、老年评估与管理后术后结局及治疗变化的评估。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Nov;14(8):101647. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101647. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Geriatric oncology screening tools for CGA-based interventions: results from a phase II study of geriatric assessment and management for older adults with cancer.老年肿瘤学筛查工具用于基于 CGA 的干预:一项老年评估和管理老年癌症患者的 II 期研究结果。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(6):683-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer.关于 G8 与老年癌症患者的老年综合评估、预后和治疗过程之间关联的系统评价。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov;10(6):847-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Optimizing the G8 Screening Tool for Older Patients With Cancer: Diagnostic Performance and Validation of a Six-Item Version.优化适用于老年癌症患者的G8筛查工具:六项版本的诊断性能及验证
Oncologist. 2016 Feb;21(2):188-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0326. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Item analysis of G8 screening in uro-oncologic geriatric patients.尿路上皮癌老年患者 G8 筛查的项目分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun;55(6):1441-1446. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03594-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
Risk stratification for surgical outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients using ISAR-HP and G8 screening tools.使用 ISAR-HP 和 G8 筛查工具对老年结直肠癌患者的手术结局进行风险分层。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Mar;9(2):110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
9
Comparison of two frailty screening tools in older patients with colorectal cancer.比较两种衰弱筛查工具在老年结直肠癌患者中的应用。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 15;23(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03974-3.
10
External validation and diagnostic value of the Elderly Functional Index version 2.0 for assessing functional status and frailty in older Danish patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy: A prospective, clinical study.老年功能指数 2.0 版本在评估接受化疗的丹麦老年胃肠道癌患者功能状态和衰弱方面的外部验证和诊断价值:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jan;15(1):101675. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101675. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Adequate assessment yields appropriate care-the role of geriatric assessment and management in older adults with cancer: a position paper from the ESMO/SIOG Cancer in the Elderly Working Group.充分评估带来恰当照护——老年癌症患者的老年综合评估和管理作用:来自 ESMO/SIOG 老年肿瘤工作组的立场文件。
ESMO Open. 2024 Aug;9(8):103657. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103657. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how.老年综合评估:临床医生的为何、何为及如何做。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Nov-Dec;74(6):496-518. doi: 10.3322/caac.21864. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Fixing the Leaky Pipe: How to Improve the Uptake of Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Prognostic and Predictive Models in Cancer Clinical Practice.
解决漏管问题:如何提高基于患者报告结局的预后和预测模型在癌症临床实践中的应用。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300070. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00070.
4
Geriatric Oncology in the Instagram Era: Feasibility and Acceptability Randomised Controlled Trial on Adopting PhotoVoice to Enable Empowerment, Patient-Centred Care, and Shared Decision Making-Study Protocol.Instagram时代的老年肿瘤学:采用照片发声法实现赋权、以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的可行性与可接受性随机对照试验——研究方案
Methods Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;6(4):68. doi: 10.3390/mps6040068.
5
Frailty and Cancer: Current Perspectives on Assessment and Monitoring.虚弱与癌症:评估和监测的当前观点。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Mar 28;18:505-521. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S365494. eCollection 2023.
6
Enrolling Older Adults Onto National Cancer Institute-Funded Clinical Trials in Community Oncology Clinics: Barriers and Solutions.将老年人纳入社区肿瘤学诊所的美国国家癌症研究所资助的临床试验中:障碍和解决方案。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Dec 15;2022(60):117-124. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac019.
7
The epidemiology of preexisting geriatric and palliative conditions in older adults with poor prognosis cancers.老年癌症预后不良患者中既有老年病又有姑息治疗情况的流行病学。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec;70(12):3402-3412. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18039. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
A prospective, multicentre study to assess frailty in elderly patients with leg ulcers (GERAS study).一项评估老年腿部溃疡患者衰弱情况的前瞻性、多中心研究(GERAS 研究)。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Feb;37(2):428-435. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18586. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
The Evolution of Geriatric Oncology and Geriatric Assessment over the Past Decade.过去十年老年肿瘤学和老年综合评估的发展。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr;32(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.002.
10
Personalised treatment for older adults with cancer: The role of frailty assessment.老年癌症患者的个性化治疗:虚弱评估的作用。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020 Dec;16:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 17.