Craig E. Pollack (
Shawn Du was formerly a PhD student in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. He is now an associate at Analysis Group in New York City.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1442-1450. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00452.
Neighborhood environments are increasingly thought to affect emergency department (ED) use. However, because people decide where to live based on a range of factors, it can be challenging to identify the causal impact of living in higher-poverty neighborhoods on increased rates of ED visits. Our study leveraged the Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program, a social experiment beginning in 1994 that randomly assigned approximately 4,600 households that received federal housing assistance to different neighborhood conditions. We linked program participants in four states with an average of twelve years of administrative data on ED use (up to twenty-one years after randomization). Contrary to our expectations, we did not find a consistently significant connection between neighborhood poverty and overall ED use during this follow-up period. This result was observed for both adults and people who were children at the time of randomization, as well as for various classifications of ED visits. The findings can help direct future research that seeks to clarify the relationship between neighborhood environments and health care use.
社区环境越来越被认为会影响急诊部门(ED)的使用。然而,由于人们基于一系列因素决定居住地点,因此很难确定居住在贫困程度较高的社区对 ED 就诊率增加的因果影响。我们的研究利用了“公平住房机会迁居计划”(Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program),这是一项始于 1994 年的社会实验,它随机将大约 4600 户获得联邦住房援助的家庭分配到不同的社区环境中。我们将四个州的计划参与者与长达十二年的 ED 使用行政数据(随机分配后长达二十一年)联系起来。与我们的预期相反,在这段随访期间,我们没有发现社区贫困与整体 ED 使用之间存在一致的显著联系。这一结果在随机分配时是成年人和儿童以及各种 ED 就诊分类中都观察到了。这些发现有助于指导未来的研究,以澄清社区环境与医疗保健使用之间的关系。