Suppr超能文献

危重症患者哌拉西林的可饱和消除:连续输注的意义。

Saturable elimination of piperacillin in critically ill patients: implications for continuous infusion.

机构信息

Ghent University Hospital, Department of Critical Care Medicine, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Anesthesiology, Groningen, The Netherlands; Ghent University, Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Dec;54(6):741-749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate saturation of piperacillin elimination in critically ill adult patients. Seventeen critically ill adult patients received continuous and intermittent infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam. Piperacillin plasma concentrations (n = 217) were analysed using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling. Post-hoc simulations were performed to evaluate the type I error rate associated with the study. Unseen data were used to validate the final model. The mean error (ME) and root mean square error (RMSE) were calculated as a measure of bias and imprecision, respectively. A PopPK model with parallel linear and non-linear elimination best fitted the data. The median and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the model parameters drug clearance (CL), volume of central compartment (V), volume of peripheral compartment (V) and intercompartmental clearance (Q) were 9 (7.69-11) L/h, 6.18 (4.93-11.2) L, 11.17 (7.26-12) L and 15.61 (12.66-23.8) L/h, respectively. The Michaelis-Menten constant (K) and the maximum elimination rate for Michaelis-Menten elimination (V) were estimated without population variability in the model to avoid overfitting and inflation of the type I error rate. The population estimates for K and V were 37.09 mg/L and 353.57 mg/h, respectively. The bias (ME) was -20.8 (95% CI -26.2 to -15.4) mg/L, whilst imprecision (RMSE) was 49.2 (95% CI 41.2-56) mg/L. In conclusion, piperacillin elimination is (partially) saturable. Moreover, the population estimate for K lies within the therapeutic window and therefore saturation of elimination should be accounted for when defining optimum dosing regimens for piperacillin in critically ill patients.

摘要

本研究旨在评估危重症成年患者哌拉西林消除的饱和情况。17 例危重症成年患者接受了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的连续和间歇性输注。采用群体药代动力学(PopPK)模型分析哌拉西林血浆浓度(n=217)。进行事后模拟以评估与该研究相关的Ⅰ类错误率。使用未见数据验证最终模型。平均误差(ME)和均方根误差(RMSE)分别作为偏差和不精确性的度量。具有平行线性和非线性消除的 PopPK 模型最适合数据。模型参数药物清除率(CL)、中央隔室体积(V)、外周隔室体积(V)和隔室间清除率(Q)的中位数和 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 9(7.69-11)L/h、6.18(4.93-11.2)L、11.17(7.26-12)L 和 15.61(12.66-23.8)L/h。Michaelis-Menten 常数(K)和 Michaelis-Menten 消除的最大消除率(V)在模型中没有人群变异性的估计,以避免过度拟合和Ⅰ类错误率的膨胀。K 和 V 的群体估计值分别为 37.09mg/L 和 353.57mg/h。偏倚(ME)为-20.8(95%CI-26.2 至-15.4)mg/L,而不精确性(RMSE)为 49.2(95%CI41.2-56)mg/L。总之,哌拉西林的消除是(部分)饱和的。此外,K 的人群估计值在治疗窗内,因此在为危重症患者定义哌拉西林最佳给药方案时,应考虑消除的饱和。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验