Rastgardani Tara, Armstrong Melissa J, Gagliardi Anna R, Grabovsky Arthur, Marras Connie
The Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Research, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 19;10:892. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00892. eCollection 2019.
OFF periods impair quality of life in Parkinson's disease and are often amenable to treatment. Optimal treatment decisions rely on effective communication between physicians, patients and carepartners regarding this highly variable and complex phenomenon. Little is published in the literature about communication about OFF periods. Informed by interviews with physicians, patients and carepartners we designed questionnaires for each group. We surveyed these parties using an online platform to investigate the frequency, content and ease of communication about OFF periods and barriers and facilitators of communication with physicians. Fifty movement disorder neurologists, 50 general neurologists, 442 patients and 97 carepartners participated. A free-flowing dialogue is the mainstay of communication according to all parties. Motor aspects of OFF periods are discussed more frequently than non-motor aspects (90 vs. <50% according to both general neurologists and movement disorder neurologists). The most common physician-reported barriers to communication are patient cognitive impairment, patient difficulty recognizing OFF periods and poor patient understanding of OFF periods' relationship to medication timing. The barriers most commonly cited as major by patients were that they perceived OFF periods to be part of the disease (i.e., not a clinical aspect that could be improved by a physician), variability of symptoms, and difficulty in describing symptoms. The most commonly described facilitator (by physicians) was the input of a caregiver. Positively viewed but less commonly used facilitators included pre-visit questionnaires or diaries, digital apps and wearable devices to monitor fluctuations. The majority of patients and carepartners identified a free-flowing dialogue with their physicians and having an agenda as helpful facilitators of communication about OFF periods which they already use. The majority of both groups felt that keeping a diary and pre-visit questionnaires were potentially helpful facilitators that were not currently in use. Perceived barriers and facilitators to communication about OFF periods are different between health care providers and receivers of health care. Modifiable barriers and facilitators that could be implemented were identified by both groups. Future research should develop and test strategies based on this input to optimize communication and thus clinical care for this common and debilitating problem.
“关”期会损害帕金森病患者的生活质量,且通常可以进行治疗。最佳治疗决策依赖于医生、患者及护理伙伴之间就这种高度可变且复杂的现象进行有效的沟通。关于“关”期沟通的文献报道很少。在对医生、患者及护理伙伴进行访谈后,我们为每个群体设计了问卷。我们使用在线平台对这些群体进行调查,以研究关于“关”期沟通的频率、内容、难易程度以及与医生沟通的障碍和促进因素。50名运动障碍神经科医生、50名普通神经科医生、442名患者和97名护理伙伴参与了调查。各方均表示,自由流畅的对话是沟通的主要方式。与非运动方面相比,“关”期的运动方面讨论得更频繁(普通神经科医生和运动障碍神经科医生均表示,分别为90%对<50%)。医生报告的最常见沟通障碍是患者认知障碍、患者难以识别“关”期以及患者对“关”期与用药时间关系的理解不佳。患者最常提及的主要障碍是他们认为“关”期是疾病的一部分(即不是医生可以改善的临床方面)、症状的变异性以及描述症状困难。最常被描述的促进因素(医生方面)是护理人员的参与。虽被积极看待但较少使用的促进因素包括就诊前问卷或日记、数字应用程序以及用于监测波动的可穿戴设备。大多数患者和护理伙伴认为与医生自由流畅的对话以及有一个议程是关于“关”期沟通的有益促进因素,他们已经在使用。两组中的大多数人都认为记日记和就诊前问卷是潜在有用的促进因素,但目前尚未使用。医疗保健提供者和接受者对“关”期沟通的感知障碍和促进因素不同。两组都确定了可以实施的可改变障碍和促进因素。未来的研究应基于这些意见制定和测试策略,以优化沟通,从而改善对这个常见且使人衰弱问题的临床护理。