• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首个经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的植入式血液分离血管通路装置的实施情况和 2 年结果。

Implementation and 2-year outcomes of the first FDA-approved implantable apheresis vascular access device.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2019 Nov;59(11):3461-3467. doi: 10.1111/trf.15512. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/trf.15512
PMID:31483876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring chronic apheresis treatments typically lack sufficient peripheral venous access to support long-term therapy. Historically, central venous tunneled catheters, septum-bearing subcutaneous ports, and fistulas were used to obtain required blood flow rates for apheresis procedures. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first intravascular device specifically designed for apheresis therapy, the PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port.

METHODS

Several preimplementation meetings with key hospital stakeholders were held to determine the most efficient and safest strategy for integrating the PowerFlow device into our practice. Interventional radiologists implanted the apheresis port in patients meeting specified criteria. Performance metrics and adverse events were evaluated over a 2-year period, July 2017 through June 2019.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent apheresis therapy using the PowerFlow port. The most common apheresis therapy provided was extracorporeal photopheresis, followed by therapeutic plasma exchange and low-density lipoprotein apheresis. Flow rates up to 90 mL/min were obtained; the rates were limited by patient tolerance for the apheresis procedure. Complications included infection, obstruction due to fibroblastic sleeve, and migration of the vascular device. The estimated risk of PowerFlow-associated bloodstream infection in the study population was 0.18 per 1000 intravascular device days.

CONCLUSION

The PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port can achieve flow rates necessary for all apheresis therapies and is a promising alternative vascular access device for patients undergoing apheresis.

摘要

背景

需要长期进行血液分离治疗的患者通常缺乏足够的外周静脉通路来支持长期治疗。在过去,中心静脉隧道式导管、带隔皮下港和瘘管被用于获得血液分离程序所需的血流速度。2017 年,美国食品和药物管理局批准了首个专门用于血液分离治疗的血管内装置,即 PowerFlow 植入式血液分离 IV 港。

方法

与主要医院利益相关者举行了多次实施前会议,以确定将 PowerFlow 装置整合到我们的实践中的最有效和最安全的策略。介入放射科医生在符合特定标准的患者中植入血液分离港。在 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月的 2 年期间,评估了性能指标和不良事件。

结果

18 名患者接受了 PowerFlow 港的血液分离治疗。提供的最常见的血液分离治疗是体外光化学疗法,其次是治疗性血浆置换和低密度脂蛋白分离。获得了高达 90ml/min 的流速;流速受患者对血液分离程序的耐受程度限制。并发症包括感染、纤维鞘阻塞和血管装置迁移。研究人群中 PowerFlow 相关血流感染的估计风险为每 1000 个血管内装置日 0.18 例。

结论

PowerFlow 植入式血液分离 IV 港可以达到所有血液分离治疗所需的流速,是接受血液分离治疗的患者有前途的血管内替代通路装置。

相似文献

1
Implementation and 2-year outcomes of the first FDA-approved implantable apheresis vascular access device.首个经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的植入式血液分离血管通路装置的实施情况和 2 年结果。
Transfusion. 2019 Nov;59(11):3461-3467. doi: 10.1111/trf.15512. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
New subcutaneous PowerFlow port results in cost and time-savings in a busy outpatient apheresis clinic.新型皮下PowerFlow端口在繁忙的门诊血液分离诊所节省了成本和时间。
J Clin Apher. 2019 Aug;34(4):482-486. doi: 10.1002/jca.21678. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Performance characteristics of the PowerFlow apheresis port: Early experience.PowerFlow单采端口的性能特征:早期经验
J Clin Apher. 2019 Dec;34(6):661-665. doi: 10.1002/jca.21743. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Strategies to Aid Identification of Apheresis PowerFlow Ports: A Case Report.辅助识别单采血流动力系统管路的策略:病例报告。
J Emerg Nurs. 2021 Jan;47(1):21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
Dual-chambered venous access port as alternative access for extracorporeal apheresis therapy.双腔静脉接入端口作为体外血液净化治疗的另一种选择。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):173-177. doi: 10.1177/1129729820932425. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Use of a dual lumen port for automated red cell exchange in adults with sickle cell disease.双腔端口在成人镰状细胞病自动红细胞置换中的应用。
J Clin Apher. 2015 Dec;30(6):353-8. doi: 10.1002/jca.21393. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Use of a novel configuration of ports for patients needing intermittent long-term apheresis.为需要间歇性长期血液分离术的患者使用新型端口配置。
J Clin Apher. 2024 Aug;39(4):e22143. doi: 10.1002/jca.22143.
8
Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.用于长期化疗的完全植入式中心静脉通路导管。一项前瞻性研究,分析333个装置的并发症和成本,最短随访期为180天。
Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392423469.
9
Prospective investigation of a subcutaneous, implantable central venous access device for therapeutic plasma exchange in adults with neurological disorders.皮下可植入式中心静脉通路装置用于患有神经系统疾病的成人进行治疗性血浆置换的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Apher. 2002;17(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/jca.10014.
10
Vascular access in therapeutic apheresis: One size does not fit all.治疗性血液净化中的血管通路:并非一种方案适合所有患者。
Ther Apher Dial. 2022 Aug;26(4):694-716. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13799. Epub 2022 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.
2
An update on lipid apheresis for familial hypercholesterolemia.家族性高胆固醇血症的脂质吸附治疗进展。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Feb;38(2):371-382. doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05541-1. Epub 2022 Apr 25.