• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双腔静脉接入端口作为体外血液净化治疗的另一种选择。

Dual-chambered venous access port as alternative access for extracorporeal apheresis therapy.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):173-177. doi: 10.1177/1129729820932425. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1177/1129729820932425
PMID:32538271
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of a dual-chambered venous access port for extracorporeal apheresis therapy.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients who received a dual-chambered venous access port for apheresis therapy over a 36-month period. Clinical success was defined as successful completion of at least one round of apheresis via the venous access port. Major complications were defined as any event requiring elevation of patient care and/or venous access port removal or repositioning. Minor complications were defined as venous access port issues resolved with clinical intervention.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients had a venous access port placed at the time of this study. Patients underwent red cell exchange (n = 33), therapeutic plasma exchange (n = 6) or extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 5). Forty (90%) patients had autoimmune diseases and four (10%) had neoplastic processes. Clinical success was achieved in 42 (95.5%) patients. Average venous access port dwell time was 632 days (range = 42-1191 days). All therapies through the venous access ports were well tolerated and no patients reported pain or discomfort. Major complications were seen in nine (20.5%) patients-the majority (n = 7) of which were due to venous access port malfunction-and resolved with catheter revision. One (2.27%) major complication involved an infected venous access port, and one involved a large hematoma at the venous access port site. Minor complications were seen in eight (18.2%) patients, where simple flushing of the catheter with saline or tissue plasminogen activator resolved the issue.

CONCLUSION

The dual-chambered venous access port was successfully used for sustained blood flow in apheresis therapy with a moderate, yet correctable complication rate.

摘要

目的

评估双腔静脉接入端口在体外血液分离治疗中的应用。

方法

这是一项在 36 个月内对所有接受双腔静脉接入端口进行血液分离治疗的患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。临床成功定义为通过静脉接入端口成功完成至少一轮血液分离治疗。主要并发症定义为任何需要提高患者护理水平和/或需要移除或重新定位静脉接入端口的事件。次要并发症定义为通过临床干预解决的静脉接入端口问题。

结果

在本研究中,44 名患者植入了静脉接入端口。患者接受红细胞交换(n=33)、治疗性血浆置换(n=6)或体外光化学疗法(n=5)。40 名(90%)患者患有自身免疫性疾病,4 名(10%)患者患有肿瘤性疾病。42 名(95.5%)患者达到了临床成功。静脉接入端口平均留置时间为 632 天(范围 42-1191 天)。所有通过静脉接入端口进行的治疗均耐受良好,无患者报告疼痛或不适。9 名(20.5%)患者出现主要并发症-其中大多数(n=7)是由于静脉接入端口故障引起的-通过导管修改得到解决。1 例(2.27%)主要并发症涉及感染的静脉接入端口,1 例涉及静脉接入端口部位的大血肿。8 名(18.2%)患者出现轻微并发症,通过用生理盐水或组织纤溶酶原激活剂冲洗导管即可解决问题。

结论

双腔静脉接入端口在血液分离治疗中成功地用于维持血流,并发症发生率适中,但可纠正。

相似文献

1
Dual-chambered venous access port as alternative access for extracorporeal apheresis therapy.双腔静脉接入端口作为体外血液净化治疗的另一种选择。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):173-177. doi: 10.1177/1129729820932425. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Implementation and 2-year outcomes of the first FDA-approved implantable apheresis vascular access device.首个经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的植入式血液分离血管通路装置的实施情况和 2 年结果。
Transfusion. 2019 Nov;59(11):3461-3467. doi: 10.1111/trf.15512. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Use of a dual lumen port for automated red cell exchange in adults with sickle cell disease.双腔端口在成人镰状细胞病自动红细胞置换中的应用。
J Clin Apher. 2015 Dec;30(6):353-8. doi: 10.1002/jca.21393. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
How to perform extracorporeal photopheresis via port catheter.如何通过端口导管进行体外光化学疗法。
Transfusion. 2017 Nov;57(11):2567-2570. doi: 10.1111/trf.14265. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.对于早期乳腺癌患者,在上臂植入全植入式静脉通路端口是可行且安全的。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):609-614. doi: 10.1177/1129729819894461. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.肿瘤患者上肢植入式静脉通路装置的长期随访
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Apr;10(4):463-71. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70066-7.
7
Vascular access considerations for extracorporeal photopheresis.体外光化学疗法的血管通路考量
Transfusion. 2018 Feb;58 Suppl 1:590-597. doi: 10.1111/trf.14500.
8
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.小儿人群中低调可植入式静脉通路端口的放射学放置
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
9
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.外周静脉输液港:109例患者的结果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s002700010041.
10
Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.介入放射科医生连续放置100个中心静脉通路手臂端口的经验。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;8(6):983-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70698-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.