Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry of the Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eye (Lond). 2020 May;34(5):857-863. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0569-x. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
To evaluate the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates following implantation of two hydrophobic acrylic IOLs.
In a randomized, controlled trial, 80 patients with bilateral senile cataract were implanted with the hydrophobic acrylic single-piece intraocular Lenses (IOLs) EyeCee One in one eye and iMics1 in the other. Outcomes of 39 patients (78 eyes) were evaluated after 3 years. Automated Quantification of After-Cataract (AQUA; for PCO occurrence), visual acuity, anterior fibrosis, capsule-optic edge interaction and distance between anterior and posterior capsule IOL surface were analysed.
After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 1.95 months, Nd:YAG capsulotomy occurred at a rate of 15.4% and 46.2% in the EyeCee One and iMics1 groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Respective mean PCO scores measured by AQUA were 1.57 ± 1.63 and 2.45 ± 1.44 (p = 0.019). A distinct gap between the anterior capsule and the IOL optic was present in 89% of eyes implanted with EyeCee One and 13% of iMics1 eyes. A gap between the posterior capsule and the posterior surface of the lens was observed in 76% of EyeCee One eyes and 35% of iMics1 eyes.
Study findings suggest that PCO and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates are significantly lower in eyes implanted with the EyeCee One IOL compared to the iMics1 IOL. Optic sharpness and lens material seem to be the decisive factors, while the stepped edge beneath the haptic junction appeared to be ineffective.
评估两种疏水性丙烯酸人工晶状体植入术后后囊混浊(PCO)和 Nd:YAG 后囊切开率的发展情况。
在一项随机对照试验中,80 例双侧老年性白内障患者分别植入疏水性丙烯酸一体式人工晶状体(IOL) EyeCee One 于一眼,iMics1 于另一眼。3 年后评估 39 例(78 只眼)患者的结局。采用自动后发性白内障量化分析(AQUA;用于 PCO 发生)、视力、前纤维、囊膜-光学边缘相互作用以及前囊膜和后囊膜 IOL 表面之间的距离来进行分析。
平均随访 38±1.95 个月后,EyeCee One 组和 iMics1 组 Nd:YAG 后囊切开率分别为 15.4%和 46.2%(p<0.01)。分别用 AQUA 测量的 PCO 平均评分分别为 1.57±1.63 和 2.45±1.44(p=0.019)。89%植入 EyeCee One 的眼中存在前囊膜和 IOL 光学之间的明显间隙,而 iMics1 眼中仅有 13%存在该间隙。76%植入 EyeCee One 的眼中观察到后囊膜和镜片后表面之间的间隙,而 iMics1 眼中仅有 35%存在该间隙。
研究结果表明,与 iMics1 IOL 相比,植入 EyeCee One IOL 的眼中 PCO 和 Nd:YAG 后囊切开率显著降低。光学清晰度和镜片材料似乎是决定性因素,而在凸台交界处下方的阶梯边缘似乎无效。