• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种由相同材料制成,但设计和光学结构不同的老视矫正人工晶状体的临床结果、视觉质量和视觉功能比较。

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Visual Quality and Visual Function of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Made from the Same Material, but with Different Design and Optics.

作者信息

Nováček Ladislav Viktor, Němcová Marie, Tyx Kateřina, Lahodová Kristýna, Rejmont Leoš, Rozsíval Pavel, Studený Pavel

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Ophthalmology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Military University Hospital Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 24;10(15):3268. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153268.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10153268
PMID:34362052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8347739/
Abstract

This semi-prospective, parallel, comparative investigation evaluated the clinical outcomes and quality of vision (contrast sensitivity, visual function, dysphotopsia, spectacle use, overall satisfaction) after mono- or bilateral implantation of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOL)-the Liberty 677MY or the AT LISA tri 839M-in 50 eyes of 25 cataract patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Eighty-nine percent of eyes implanted with the Liberty IOL and 59% of eyes implanted with the AT LISA IOL achieved a refractive outcome ±0.5 diopters of the target (emmetropia). Refractive outcomes were stable with both lenses. The proportions of eyes with 20/20 uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and 20/20 uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were higher in the Liberty group than in the AT LISA group (UDVA: 56% vs. 41%; UNVA: 83% vs. 66%). Optical quality assessment results were comparable for the two IOLs. Superior photopic contrast sensitivity was found with the Liberty lens. The rate of Nd:YAG capsulotomy at the 12-month follow-up was 16.7% in the Liberty group and 40.6% for the AT LISA IOL. Considering that both lenses are made from the same material, we propose that the noted differences in clinical outcomes may derive from differences in design and optical surface between the two IOLs.

摘要

这项半前瞻性、平行、对比研究评估了25例白内障患者50只眼单眼或双眼植入两种矫正老花眼的人工晶状体(IOL)——Liberty 677MY或AT LISA tri 839M后的临床结果和视觉质量(对比敏感度、视觉功能、畏光、眼镜使用情况、总体满意度)。术后3个月和12个月评估临床结果。植入Liberty人工晶状体的眼中89%以及植入AT LISA人工晶状体的眼中59%达到了目标(正视)±0.5屈光度的屈光结果。两种晶状体的屈光结果均稳定。Liberty组中未矫正远视力(UDVA)和未矫正近视力(UNVA)达到20/20的眼的比例高于AT LISA组(UDVA:56%对41%;UNVA:83%对66%)。两种人工晶状体的光学质量评估结果相当。Liberty晶状体具有更高的明视对比敏感度。在12个月随访时,Liberty组Nd:YAG囊切开术的发生率为16.7%,AT LISA人工晶状体组为40.6%。考虑到两种晶状体由相同材料制成,我们认为观察到的临床结果差异可能源于两种人工晶状体在设计和光学表面上的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77de/8347739/1ae918f7edc2/jcm-10-03268-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77de/8347739/1ae918f7edc2/jcm-10-03268-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77de/8347739/1ae918f7edc2/jcm-10-03268-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Visual Quality and Visual Function of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Made from the Same Material, but with Different Design and Optics.两种由相同材料制成,但设计和光学结构不同的老视矫正人工晶状体的临床结果、视觉质量和视觉功能比较。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 24;10(15):3268. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153268.
2
Comparison of three different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.三种不同的矫正老视的人工晶状体的比较。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct-Dec;64(4):364-379. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2020.58.
3
Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.新型折射性多焦点人工晶状体与下段近附加型和衍射性多焦点人工晶状体的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
4
Comparison of Patients With Emmetropia and Presbyopia and Different Accommodation Who Undergo Unilateral or Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal IOL.单眼或双眼植入三焦点人工晶状体的正视眼、老花眼及不同调节能力患者的比较
J Refract Surg. 2023 Dec;39(12):817-824. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20231018-01. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.白内障手术后预防后囊膜混浊的人工晶状体光学边缘设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD012516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2.
6
Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.白内障手术中可调节人工晶状体与标准单焦点人工晶状体植入的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 1;2014(5):CD009667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009667.pub2.
7
Distance and near visual acuity improvement after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with presbyopia: a systematic review.多焦点人工晶状体植入治疗老视白内障患者的远、近视力改善:系统评价。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;28(6):426-35. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120518-06.
8
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.两种三焦点衍射人工晶状体和一种扩展视力范围人工晶状体在视觉效果、阅读技能、对比敏感度及患者满意度方面的比较分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
[Observation of visual quality after implantation of a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens with a low addition region using the micromonovision design].[使用微单眼视力设计植入具有低加光区的旋转非对称折射型人工晶状体后的视觉质量观察]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 11;59(12):1019-1029. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20230220-00060.
10
Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体的临床性能比较:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186522. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.各种矫正老视的白内障手术中人工晶状体的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03446-1.
2
Presbyopia: What We Do Know and What We Do Not Know in 2022.老花眼:2022年我们所知道的和不知道的
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 19;12(3):794. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030794.
3
A prospective study of a new presbyopia pseudophakic intraocular lens: Safety, efficacy and satisfaction.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of three different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.三种不同的矫正老视的人工晶状体的比较。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct-Dec;64(4):364-379. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2020.58.
2
Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes with Two Trifocal IOLs with Similar Optical Design but Different Materials.两种具有相似光学设计但材料不同的三焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能和患者满意度结果比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 13;14:3237-3247. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273641. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of the rotational stability between plate-haptic toric and C-loop haptic toric IOLs in myopic eyes.
一项新的老视型人工晶状体的前瞻性研究:安全性、有效性和满意度。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;70(9):3305-3310. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2795_21.
4
Simultaneous Presbyopia and Astigmatism Correction with a Novel Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens-A One-Year Follow-Up.新型三焦点环曲面人工晶状体同步矫正老花眼和散光——一年随访
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):4194. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144194.
5
Comparison of Anterior Capsule Polishing on the Rate of Neodymium: YAG Laser Capsulotomy After Two Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.两种多焦点人工晶状体植入术后前囊抛光对钕:钇铝石榴石激光晶状体切开术发生率的影响比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;9:815966. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.815966. eCollection 2022.
比较板状触觉toric 与 C 形袢触觉 toric IOL 在近视眼中的旋转稳定性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Oct;46(10):1353-1359. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000259.
4
Posterior capsule opacification: What's in the bag?后囊膜混浊:袋里有什么?
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 May;82:100905. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100905. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Effect of Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration on Visual Acuity, Dysphotopsia and Wavefront Aberrations.人工晶状体倾斜和偏心对视力、畏光和波前像差的影响。
Vision (Basel). 2020 Sep 14;4(3):41. doi: 10.3390/vision4030041.
6
Pseudophakic Dysphotopsia: Review of Incidence, Cause, and Treatment of Positive and Negative Dysphotopsia.人工晶状体眼像差:正性和负性像差的发生率、病因和治疗的综述。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e195-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
Surgical management of positive dysphotopsia: U.S. perspective.正性像差性视差的手术治疗:美国视角。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Nov;46(11):1474-1479. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000307.
8
Multicenter visual outcomes comparison of 2 trifocal presbyopia-correcting IOLs: 6-month postoperative results.多中心 2 种三焦点老视矫正型人工晶状体术后 6 个月视觉效果比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Nov;46(11):1534-1542. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000274.
9
Visual function and subjective perception of vision after bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal IOLs: a randomized controlled trial.单焦点和多焦点人工晶状体双侧植入后的视觉功能和视觉主观感受:一项随机对照试验。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jul;46(7):1020-1029. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000210.
10
Decentration and tilt of plate-haptic multifocal intraocular lenses in myopic eyes.近视眼中平板触觉多焦点人工晶状体的偏心和倾斜
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Apr 7;7:17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00186-3. eCollection 2020.