Suppr超能文献

皮下注射C1抑制剂预防遗传性血管性水肿发作:一项安慰剂对照随机研究的额外结果及亚组分析

Subcutaneous C1 inhibitor for prevention of attacks of hereditary angioedema: additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a placebo-controlled randomized study.

作者信息

Li H Henry, Zuraw Bruce, Longhurst Hilary J, Cicardi Marco, Bork Konrad, Baker James, Lumry William, Bernstein Jonathan, Manning Michael, Levy Donald, Riedl Marc A, Feuersenger Henrike, Prusty Subhransu, Pragst Ingo, Machnig Thomas, Craig Timothy

机构信息

1Institute for Asthma and Allergy, 2 Wisconsin Cir #250, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 USA.

2UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr., Mail code 0732, La Jolla, CA 92093-0732 USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019 Aug 28;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s13223-019-0362-1. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a debilitating disorder resulting from C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency. In the COMPACT phase 3 study the prophylactic use of a subcutaneous C1 inhibitor (C1-INH [SC], HAEGARDA, CSL Behring) twice weekly significantly reduced the frequency of acute edema attacks. Analysis of treatment effects by subgroups, onset of effect, and other exploratory analysis have not been reported.

METHODS

This is a post hoc exploratory analysis on data from the randomized, placebo-controlled COMPACT study. 90 patients with C1-INH-HAE were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences: C1-INH (SC) 40 or 60 IU/kg of body weight twice weekly for 16 weeks, preceded or followed by a placebo period. The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint was the time-normalized number of HAE attacks, and pre-specified secondary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients with a certain treatment response (≥ 50% reduction on C1-INH (SC) versus placebo in the time-normalized number of attacks) and the time-normalized number of use of rescue medication. Pre-specified exploratory endpoints included severity of attacks, alone and combined with rescue medication use. Post hoc analyses included exploration of onset of effect and clinical assessment of patients with < 50% of response.

RESULTS

Subgroup findings by various patient characteristics showed a consistent preventive effect of C1-INH (SC). In a post hoc analysis of attacks, the onset of the preventive effect within the first 2 weeks after treatment initiation in COMPACT showed that 10/43 patients (23%) experienced attacks of any severity with 60 IU/kg versus 34/42 patients (81%) with placebo. The need for rescue medication was tenfold lower with 60 IU/kg (35 treated attacks) versus placebo (358 treated attacks). A qualitative analysis of the 4 patients treated with 60 IU/kg and with < 50% reduction of attacks demonstrated a reduction in severity of attacks, rescue medication use, and symptom days which was considered a clinically meaningful treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-INH (SC) prophylaxis demonstrated a preventive treatment effect with evidence of benefit within 2 weeks. A consistent treatment effect at recommended C1-INH (SC) dosing was evident in all subgroups of patients with type I/II HAE and by various measures of disease and treatment burden. EU Clinical Trials Register, 2013-000916-10, Registered 10 December 2013, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2013-000916-10; ClinicalTrials.gov Register, NCT01912456, Registered 31 July 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01912456.

摘要

背景

遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种由C1酯酶抑制剂(C1-INH)缺乏引起的使人衰弱的疾病。在COMPACT 3期研究中,每周两次皮下注射C1抑制剂(C1-INH [SC],HAEGARDA,CSL Behring)进行预防性治疗,可显著降低急性水肿发作的频率。尚未报告按亚组分析治疗效果、起效时间及其他探索性分析。

方法

这是一项对随机、安慰剂对照的COMPACT研究数据进行的事后探索性分析。90例C1-INH-HAE患者被随机分为4种治疗方案之一:每周两次皮下注射体重40或60 IU/kg的C1-INH(SC),共16周,治疗前或治疗后有一个安慰剂期。预先设定的主要疗效终点是HAE发作的时间标准化次数,预先设定的次要疗效终点是有特定治疗反应的患者百分比(在发作的时间标准化次数方面,C1-INH(SC)组较安慰剂组减少≥50%)以及救援药物使用的时间标准化次数。预先设定的探索性终点包括发作的严重程度,以及与救援药物使用情况相结合。事后分析包括探索起效时间以及对反应<50%的患者进行临床评估。

结果

根据各种患者特征进行的亚组分析显示,C1-INH(SC)具有一致的预防效果。在对发作的事后分析中,COMPACT研究中治疗开始后前2周内预防效果的起效情况显示,60 IU/kg组43例患者中有10例(23%)经历了任何严重程度的发作,而安慰剂组42例患者中有34例(81%)发作。60 IU/kg组(35次治疗发作)对救援药物的需求比安慰剂组(358次治疗发作)低10倍。对4例接受60 IU/kg治疗且发作减少<50%的患者进行的定性分析表明,发作严重程度、救援药物使用情况和症状天数均有所减少,这被认为是具有临床意义的治疗效果。

结论

C1-INH(SC)预防治疗显示出预防效果,且在2周内有获益证据。在I/II型HAE患者的所有亚组中,按推荐的C1-INH(SC)剂量给药均有一致的治疗效果,且在疾病和治疗负担的各种衡量指标上均如此。欧盟临床试验注册中心,2013-000916-10,于2013年12月10日注册,https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2013-000916-10;美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册中心,NCT01912456,于2013年7月31日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01912456。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b1/6714075/43dc62a6033b/13223_2019_362_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验