• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年住院患者样本中认知信任与边缘性病理之间的关系。

The relation between epistemic trust and borderline pathology in an adolescent inpatient sample.

作者信息

Orme William, Bowersox Lauren, Vanwoerden Salome, Fonagy Peter, Sharp Carla

机构信息

1Baylor College of Medicine, The Menninger Clinic, Houston, Texas USA.

2University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA.

出版信息

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Aug 28;6:13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0110-7. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40479-019-0110-7
PMID:31485332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent extensions of mentalization theory have included the hypothesis that a reduced capacity for epistemic trust in the context of attachment relationships may represent a core vulnerability for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The first aim of the current study was to explore empirical relationships between epistemic trust and symptoms of BPD. The second aim was to explore the effect of epistemic trust on treatment response.

METHODS

Data were collected from 322 inpatient adolescents. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) trust in mother and father subscales were used to approximate epistemic trust in the absence of a validated measure. A multimodal approach was used to measure BPD including self-report, parent-report, and interviewer ratings. Regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between IPPA trust scores and measures of BPD. Mixed-design analyses of variance were conducted to evaluate whether self-reported parent trust at admission influenced progress in treatment.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, results indicated that reduced IPPA trust in parents correlated with BPD symptoms across various measures. Levels of IPPA trust in parents at admission did not moderate a reduction in BPD symptoms over the course of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides support for the theoretical association between deficits in epistemic trust and BPD while also highlighting the need for a validated measure of epistemic trust. Although parent trust at admission did not moderate a reduction in BPD symptoms over the course of treatment, this result may suggest that progress in treatment, and perhaps the ability to cultivate trust in the treatment setting and providers, may not be overly determined by levels of parent trust.

摘要

背景

心理化理论最近的扩展内容包括这样一种假设,即在依恋关系背景下认知信任能力的下降可能是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)发展的核心脆弱因素。本研究的首要目的是探讨认知信任与BPD症状之间的实证关系。第二个目的是探讨认知信任对治疗反应的影响。

方法

收集了322名住院青少年的数据。在没有经过验证的测量工具的情况下,使用父母与同伴依恋量表(IPPA)中对母亲和父亲信任的子量表来近似认知信任。采用多模式方法测量BPD,包括自我报告、父母报告和访谈者评分。进行回归分析以探讨IPPA信任分数与BPD测量指标之间的关系。进行混合设计方差分析以评估入院时自我报告的对父母的信任是否会影响治疗进展。

结果

正如所假设的那样,结果表明,IPPA中对父母信任的降低与各种测量指标下的BPD症状相关。入院时IPPA对父母的信任水平并没有缓和治疗过程中BPD症状的减轻。

结论

本研究为认知信任缺陷与BPD之间的理论关联提供了支持,同时也强调了需要一种经过验证的认知信任测量工具。尽管入院时对父母的信任并没有缓和治疗过程中BPD症状的减轻,但这一结果可能表明,治疗进展,也许还有在治疗环境和提供者中培养信任的能力,可能不会过度取决于对父母的信任水平。

相似文献

1
The relation between epistemic trust and borderline pathology in an adolescent inpatient sample.青少年住院患者样本中认知信任与边缘性病理之间的关系。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Aug 28;6:13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0110-7. eCollection 2019.
2
Hypermentalizing, attachment, and epistemic trust in adolescent BPD: Clinical illustrations.青少年边缘型人格障碍中的过度心理化、依恋与认知信任:临床例证
Personal Disord. 2017 Apr;8(2):172-182. doi: 10.1037/per0000161. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
Epistemic Petrification and the Restoration of Epistemic Trust: A New Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder and Its Psychosocial Treatment.认知僵化与认知信任的恢复:边缘型人格障碍的新概念化及其社会心理治疗
J Pers Disord. 2015 Oct;29(5):575-609. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.5.575.
4
First empirical evaluation of outcomes for mentalization-based group therapy for adolescents with BPD.精神分析团体治疗对 BPD 青少年疗效的首次实证评估。
Personal Disord. 2017 Oct;8(4):396-401. doi: 10.1037/per0000210. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
5
A role for epistemic trust in speech-language pathology: A tutorial paper.认知信任在言语语言病理学中的作用:一篇教程论文。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Mar-Apr;72:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust.一种认知信任自我报告测量方法的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. eCollection 2021.
7
An investigation of the mentalization-based model of borderline pathology in adolescents.青少年边缘性病理的心理化模型研究。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;84:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
8
Adolescence in lockdown: The protective role of mentalizing and epistemic trust.疫情下的青春期:心理化和认识信任的保护作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Apr;79(4):969-984. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23453. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
The mediating role of mentalizing capacity between parents and peer attachment and adolescent borderline personality disorder.心智化能力在父母与同伴依恋及青少年边缘型人格障碍之间的中介作用。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Nov 24;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0074-4. eCollection 2017.
10
Mentalization-based treatment in groups for adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or subthreshold BPD versus treatment as usual (M-GAB): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于心理化的团体治疗对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)或阈下BPD青少年与常规治疗的对照研究(M-GAB):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jul 12;17(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1431-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Epistemic trust and associations with psychopathology: Validation of the German version of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity-Questionnaire (ETMCQ).认知信任与精神病理学的关联:认知信任、不信任和轻信问卷(ETMCQ)德语版的验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0312995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312995. eCollection 2024.
2
Trust under development: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) for adolescents.正在发展中的信任:青少年认识信任、不信任和轻信问卷(ETMCQ)的意大利验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0307229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307229. eCollection 2024.
3
Different epistemic stances for different traumatic experiences: implications for mentalization.不同创伤经历的不同认知立场:对心理化的影响。
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):708. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.708.
4
Epistemic trust: a comprehensive review of empirical insights and implications for developmental psychopathology.认知信任:对实证见解及对发展性精神病理学影响的全面综述
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.
5
Who Is Afraid of Monkeypox? Analysis of Psychosocial Factors Associated with the First Reactions of Fear of Monkeypox in the Italian Population.谁害怕猴痘?意大利人群中与对猴痘恐惧的第一反应相关的社会心理因素分析。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;13(3):235. doi: 10.3390/bs13030235.
6
Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ).拆包信任:意大利版认识信任、不信任和轻信问卷(ETMCQ)的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280328. eCollection 2023.
7
The impact of outcome expectancy on therapy outcome in adolescents with borderline personality disorder.结果预期对边缘型人格障碍青少年治疗结果的影响。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2022 Dec 5;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00200-1.
8
Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy.边缘型人格障碍患者的反讽识别:一项检验分裂型特质、反应偏差和共情的实验研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2022 Oct 4;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00194-w.
9
Potential epigenetic mechanisms in psychotherapy: a pilot study on DNA methylation and mentalization change in borderline personality disorder.心理治疗中的潜在表观遗传机制:关于边缘型人格障碍患者DNA甲基化与心理化改变的一项初步研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 12;16:955005. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.955005. eCollection 2022.
10
Interpersonal trust in adolescents with psychiatric disorders and borderline pathology.患有精神疾病和边缘性病理状态的青少年的人际信任
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;9:176-186. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2021-020. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Difficulties with being socially accepted: An experimental study in borderline personality disorder.难以被社会接纳:边缘型人格障碍的实验研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):670-682. doi: 10.1037/abn0000373. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
2
Differential symptomatology and functioning in borderline personality disorder across age groups.边缘型人格障碍在不同年龄组中的差异症状学和功能表现。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.081. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
Prevention and early intervention for borderline personality disorder: a novel public health priority.边缘型人格障碍的预防与早期干预:一项新的公共卫生重点工作。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):215-216. doi: 10.1002/wps.20429.
4
Hypermentalizing, attachment, and epistemic trust in adolescent BPD: Clinical illustrations.青少年边缘型人格障碍中的过度心理化、依恋与认知信任:临床例证
Personal Disord. 2017 Apr;8(2):172-182. doi: 10.1037/per0000161. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Translation: Mentalizing as treatment target in borderline personality disorder.翻译:将心智化作为边缘型人格障碍的治疗目标。
Personal Disord. 2015 Oct;6(4):380-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000113.
6
Epistemic Petrification and the Restoration of Epistemic Trust: A New Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder and Its Psychosocial Treatment.认知僵化与认知信任的恢复:边缘型人格障碍的新概念化及其社会心理治疗
J Pers Disord. 2015 Oct;29(5):575-609. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.5.575.
7
Practitioner Review: Borderline personality disorder in adolescence--recent conceptualization, intervention, and implications for clinical practice.从业者评论:青少年边缘型人格障碍——近期的概念化、干预及对临床实践的启示
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;56(12):1266-88. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12449. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
The Lifetime Course of Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍的终生病程
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60(7):303-8. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000702.
9
The structure of personality pathology: Both general ('g') and specific ('s') factors?人格病理学的结构:一般(“g”)因素和特殊(“s”)因素兼具?
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):387-98. doi: 10.1037/abn0000033. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
Mentalization in children and mothers in the context of trauma: An initial study of the validity of the Child Reflective Functioning Scale.创伤背景下儿童与母亲的心理化:儿童反思功能量表效度的初步研究
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Jun;33(2):203-17. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12074. Epub 2014 Dec 8.