• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于初级保健的员工对实施适合 75 岁以上女性的乳房 X 光摄影决策辅助工具的想法:一项定性研究。

Primary Care-Based Staff Ideas for Implementing a Mammography Decision Aid for Women 75+: a Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2414-2420. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05239-5. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-05239-5
PMID:31485969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6848349/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously developed a pamphlet decision aid (DA) on mammography screening for women ≥ 75 years. However, implementing DAs in primary care may be challenging and may require support from non-physician healthcare team members.

OBJECTIVE

To learn from primary care administrators, nurses, and staff their thoughts on how best to implement a mammography DA for women ≥ 75 years in practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative study entailing in-person individual interviews using a semi-structured interview guide.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-two non-physician healthcare team members (69.6% of those approached) participated from 8 different primary care practices (community and academic) in the Boston area or in Chapel Hill, NC.

APPROACH

Participants were asked to provide feedback on the DA, their thoughts on ways to make the DA available to older women, and factors that would make it easier and/or harder to implement.

KEY RESULTS

Participants felt the DA was clear, balanced, and understandable, but felt that it needed to be shorter for women with low health literacy. Most participants felt that as long as use of the DA was approved and supported by clinicians that women ≥ 75 years should receive the DA before a visit from staff (usually medical assistants) so that patients could ask their clinicians questions during the visit. Facilitators of DA use included its perceived helpfulness with decision-making, its format, and that existing systems (panel management, electronic medical record alerts) could be accessed to get the DA to patients especially at Medicare Annual Wellness visits. Participants perceived a need for training, albeit minimal, to provide the DA to patients. Barriers of DA use included competing demands on clinician and staff time.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants felt that as long as use of the mammography DA for women ≥ 75 years was supported by clinicians, it would be feasible to implement with minimal refinements to existing healthcare system processes.

摘要

背景

我们之前开发了一份针对≥75 岁女性乳房 X 光筛查的小册子决策辅助工具(DA)。然而,在初级保健中实施 DAs 可能具有挑战性,并且可能需要非医师医疗团队成员的支持。

目的

了解初级保健管理人员、护士和工作人员对如何在实践中为≥75 岁女性实施乳房 X 光 DA 的最佳想法。

设计

使用半结构化访谈指南进行面对面的个人访谈的定性研究。

参与者

来自波士顿地区或北卡罗来纳州教堂山的 8 个不同初级保健实践的 32 名非医师医疗团队成员(接近的人中的 69.6%)参与了研究。

方法

参与者被要求对 DA 提供反馈,对使 DA 可供老年女性使用的方法的想法,以及使其更容易和/或更难实施的因素。

主要结果

参与者认为 DA 清晰、平衡且易于理解,但认为对于健康素养较低的女性,DA 需要更短。大多数参与者认为,只要使用 DA 得到临床医生的批准和支持,≥75 岁的女性应该在工作人员(通常是医疗助理)就诊前收到 DA,以便患者可以在就诊期间向他们的临床医生提问。使用 DA 的促进因素包括其对决策的帮助、格式以及现有的系统(面板管理、电子病历警报)可以用来将 DA 传递给患者,尤其是在 Medicare 年度健康检查时。参与者认为需要进行培训,尽管培训很少,但需要向患者提供 DA。使用 DA 的障碍包括临床医生和工作人员时间的竞争需求。

结论

参与者认为,只要≥75 岁女性使用乳房 X 光 DA 得到临床医生的支持,就可以在对现有医疗保健系统流程进行最小改进的情况下实施。

相似文献

1
Primary Care-Based Staff Ideas for Implementing a Mammography Decision Aid for Women 75+: a Qualitative Study.基于初级保健的员工对实施适合 75 岁以上女性的乳房 X 光摄影决策辅助工具的想法:一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2414-2420. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05239-5. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
Primary Care Providers' Perceptions of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of a Mammography Decision Aid for Women Aged 75 and Older.初级保健提供者对针对75岁及以上女性的乳房X光检查决策辅助工具的可接受性、适宜性和可行性的看法。
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Jan 21;7(1):23814683221074310. doi: 10.1177/23814683221074310. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
3
Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.针对80岁及以上女性乳腺钼靶筛查的决策制定与咨询
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):979-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00487.x.
4
Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.影响狼疮诊所中使用计算机化、个体化、文化适应的狼疮决策辅助工具的因素:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2793-2801. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04643-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
Modifying a Mammography Decision Aid for Older Adult Women with Risk Factors for Low Health Literacy.为有低健康素养风险因素的老年成年女性修改乳腺 X 线摄影决策辅助工具。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Apr;5(2):e78-e90. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210308-01. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
6
Development and evaluation of a decision aid on mammography screening for women 75 years and older.发展和评估针对 75 岁及以上女性的乳房 X 光筛查决策辅助工具。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):417-24. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13639.
7
Effects by educational attainment of a mammography screening patient decision aid for women aged 75 years and older.受教育程度对 75 岁及以上女性乳房 X 线照片筛查患者决策辅助工具的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4455-4463. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33857. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
9
Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.社区实践环境中使用基于网络的交互式决策辅助工具进行结直肠癌筛查的感知障碍与促进因素:来自与基层医疗临床医生和医疗办公室工作人员焦点小组的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18;15(12):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2914.
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查共同决策工具的混合方法系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3867. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153867.
2
Effects by educational attainment of a mammography screening patient decision aid for women aged 75 years and older.受教育程度对 75 岁及以上女性乳房 X 线照片筛查患者决策辅助工具的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4455-4463. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33857. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: A qualitative study.初级保健提供者对老年女性乳腺钼靶筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 17;22:101380. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101380. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices.两种早期乳腺癌对话辅助工具在不同实践中的实施和可持续性因素。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 10;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01115-1.
5
Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.75 岁及以上女性乳房 X 线筛查决策辅助工具的效果:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):831-842. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0440.

本文引用的文献

1
Mandatory Shared Decision Making by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for Cardiovascular Procedures and Other Tests.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心针对心血管手术及其他检查实施的强制性共同决策制定。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):641-642. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6617.
2
Breast Cancer Screening in 2018: Time for Shared Decision Making.2018年乳腺癌筛查:是时候进行共同决策了。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1814-1815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3388.
3
Primary Care Providers' Intended Use of Decision Aids for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.初级保健提供者对用于前列腺癌筛查的前列腺特异性抗原检测决策辅助工具的预期用途。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):666-670. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1353-5.
4
Practice Bulletin Number 179: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women.第179号实践公告:一般风险女性的乳腺癌风险评估与筛查
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):e1-e16. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002158.
5
Practice Bulletin No. 179 Summary: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women.第179号实践公告摘要:一般风险女性的乳腺癌风险评估与筛查
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):241-243. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002151.
6
Medicare Annual Wellness Visits: How to Get Patients and Physicians on Board.医疗保险年度健康检查:如何让患者和医生参与进来。
Fam Pract Manag. 2017 Mar/Apr;24(2):12-16.
7
A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?共享医疗预约的现实主义综述:它们如何发挥作用、对谁发挥作用以及在何种情况下发挥作用?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 4;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2064-z.
8
Attending to power differentials: How NP-led group medical visits can influence the management of chronic conditions.关注权力差异:NP 主导的团体医疗访问如何影响慢性病的管理。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):862-870. doi: 10.1111/hex.12525. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
New Roles for Medical Assistants in Innovative Primary Care Practices.医疗助理在创新型初级保健实践中的新角色。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):383-406. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12602. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.