Wangoda Robert, Nakibuuka Jane, Nyangoma Edith, Kizito Samuel, Angida Teddy
Department of Surgery Masaka Regional Referral Hospital P.O. Box 18, Masaka, Uganda.
Department of Medicine Mulago National Referral Hospital P. O. Box 7051, Kampala, Uganda.
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jun 13;33:112. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.112.16624. eCollection 2019.
Animal bite injuries are a common public health concern in Uganda. We sought to characterize animal bite injuries among patients presenting to Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda.
This was a cross sectional study from 1 September to 30 November 2011. Participants were animal bite injury victims presenting to the accident and emergency (A&E) unit at Mulago hospital and were consecutively enrolled into the study. Socio-demographics, severity and patterns of injury, health seeking and dog handling behaviours were assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize participant characteristics and the animal bite injuries. Poisson regression model's incident rate ratios (IRR) was used to explore the relationship of the number of days to accessing treatment at Mulago hospital with; a) received prior first aid, b) animal bite injury sustained during day time, c) unknown dog and d) victim resident in Kampala. Data were analyzed using STATA version 12.0 and statistical significance set at P < 0.05.
Of 25,420 patients that presented to the A&E unit during the study period, 207 (0.8%) had animal bite injuries, mean age 22.7 years (SD 14.3), 64.7% male, and 40.1% were <18 years. Majority 199 (96.1%) were bitten by a lone unrestrained and un-signaled dog that had bitten someone else in 22.2% of cases, and eight victims (0.4%) were attacked in canine gangs of 2-5 dogs. Rabies vaccination was confirmed in only 23 dogs (11.1%) as 109 (52.7%) were unknown to the victims or the communities. One hundred and eighteen victims (57.0%) sustained the dog bites within Kampala district whilst the rest occurred near or far from Kampala district, and the victims especially referred to access anti-rabies vaccine. Of 207, 189 victims (91.3%) presented within 2.6 days (SD ± 4.3). Two hundred victims (96.6%) sustained extremity injuries while the rest had injuries to other body parts. All injuries were minor and managed on out-patient basis with wound dressing, analgesics, prophylactic antibiotics and anti-rabies vaccination. Victims who received prior first aid had a rate of 1.7 times greater for seeking treatment at Mulago hospital (IRR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1) compared to those that had no prior first aid. Participants who sustained the animal bite injuries during day time had a rate of 1.6 times greater for seeking treatment at Mulago hospital (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.1) compared to those that sustained injuries at other times. Participants bitten by unknown dog and participants residing in Kampala had IRR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9 and IRR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8 respectively of accessing treatment at Mulago hospital compared to bitten by known dog and not residing in Kampala.
Dog bites injuries from unrestrained, un-signaled dogs are the commonest source of animal bite injuries especially among children (<18 years). Vaccination against rabies was only confirmed for a very small number of dogs, as majority were unknown and likely stray dogs. Government and public sensitization is urgently required to limit stray dogs, vaccinate dogs and restrain them to prevent a grave probability of a looming canine rabies epidemic.
在乌干达,动物咬伤是一个常见的公共卫生问题。我们试图对前往乌干达坎帕拉穆拉戈国家转诊医院就诊的患者中的动物咬伤情况进行特征描述。
这是一项于2011年9月1日至11月30日进行的横断面研究。研究对象为前往穆拉戈医院急诊室的动物咬伤受害者,并连续纳入研究。使用标准化问卷评估社会人口统计学特征、损伤的严重程度和模式、寻求医疗的情况以及与狗接触的行为。描述性统计用于总结研究对象的特征和动物咬伤情况。采用泊松回归模型的发病率比(IRR)来探讨在穆拉戈医院接受治疗的天数与以下因素的关系:a)接受过院前急救,b)白天遭受动物咬伤,c)未知狗咬伤,d)受害者居住在坎帕拉。数据使用STATA 12.0版本进行分析,设定统计学显著性水平为P < 0.05。
在研究期间前往急诊室的25420名患者中,207名(0.8%)有动物咬伤,平均年龄22.7岁(标准差14.3),男性占64.7%,40.1%年龄小于18岁。大多数199名(96.1%)被一只无人看管、未拴绳且未挂标识的狗咬伤,其中22.2%的案例中该狗还曾咬过其他人,8名受害者(0.4%)遭到2至5只狗组成的犬群攻击。仅23只狗(11.1%)确认接种过狂犬病疫苗,109只(52.7%)狗对受害者或社区来说情况不明。118名受害者(57.0%)在坎帕拉地区被狗咬伤,其余咬伤发生在离坎帕拉地区远近不同的地方,受害者尤其提到需要获取狂犬病疫苗。在207名受害者中,189名(91.3%)在2.6天内(标准差±4.3)前来就诊。200名受害者(96.6%)四肢受伤,其余受害者身体其他部位受伤。所有损伤均为轻伤,在门诊进行处理,包括伤口包扎、止痛、预防性使用抗生素和接种狂犬病疫苗。与未接受过院前急救的受害者相比,接受过院前急救的受害者在穆拉戈医院寻求治疗的发生率高1.7倍(IRR 1.7,95%置信区间1.4 - 2.1)。与在其他时间受伤的参与者相比,白天遭受动物咬伤的参与者在穆拉戈医院寻求治疗的发生率高1.6倍(IRR 1.6,95%置信区间1.3 - 2.1)。与被已知狗咬伤且不住在坎帕拉的参与者相比,被未知狗咬伤的参与者和居住在坎帕拉的参与者在穆拉戈医院接受治疗的IRR分别为0.7(95%置信区间0.5 - 至0.9)和0.6(95%置信区间0.5 - 0.8)。
来自无人看管、未挂标识狗的咬伤是动物咬伤最常见的来源,尤其是在儿童(<18岁)中。仅确认极少数狗接种过狂犬病疫苗,因为大多数狗情况不明且可能是流浪狗。迫切需要政府和公众进行宣传,以限制流浪狗数量、给狗接种疫苗并加以约束,防止犬类狂犬病疫情爆发的严重可能性。