Suppr超能文献

输尿管镜碎石术后支架遗漏的指征界定:单机构经验及成本分析

Indications for stent omission after ureteroscopic lithotripsy defined: A single-institution experience with cost analysis.

作者信息

Bower Paul E, Pereira Jorge, Al-Alao Osama, Kott Ohad, Velez Danielle, Thavaseelan Simone, Pareek Gyan

机构信息

Section of Minimally Invasive Urology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2019 May 16;17(3):206-211. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1614243. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

: To report on our experience with the use of an evidence-based algorithm defining specific indications for stent omission (SO) after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), as stent placement has been associated with increased cost and morbidity and indications for SO in the setting of uncomplicated ureteroscopy have been proposed but remain vague. : Indications for SO were defined as per the attached figure, data from URSL procedures performed from January 2016 to September 2017 were collected. For procedures eligible for SO, preoperative and intraoperative factors were recorded including: stone burden, presence of preoperative stent, procedure time, access sheath use, and whether SO was performed. Morbidity data were reviewed including: postoperative events, patient telephone calls for bothersome symptoms, unplanned return visits, and admissions within 30 days. : In all, 250 URSL procedures were performed during the study period, and 106 (42.4%) were eligible for SO. SO was performed in 60 (24.0%) cases reflecting a 56.7% compliance with the algorithm. There were no readmissions or re-operations within 30 days for the SO group. Lower postoperative event rates were noted in the SO group (16.7% vs 34.8%, = 0.03), unplanned return visits (8.3% vs 17.4%, = 0.16) and 30-day readmission rates (0.0% vs 6.5%, = 0.08) were also lower in the SO group, although they did not reach statistical significance. Analysis also demonstrated a protective effect of SO on unplanned return visits (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.13-1.42, = 0.17), although this was not statistically significant. No statistically significant associations were noted between postoperative events and stone burden, procedure time, or presence of preoperative stent. : We provide an algorithm defining indications for SO. SO is safe in a significant portion of URSL procedures, and SO appears to decrease postoperative events when performed judiciously. IQR: interquartile range; LUTS: lower urinary tract symptoms; OR, odds ratio; SO: stent omission; URSL: ureteroscopic lithotripsy; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet.

摘要

报告我们使用基于证据的算法定义输尿管镜碎石术(URSL)后支架遗漏(SO)的特定指征的经验,因为支架置入与成本增加和发病率上升相关,并且在简单输尿管镜检查情况下SO的指征已被提出但仍不明确。

SO的指征根据附图定义,收集了2016年1月至2017年9月进行的URSL手术的数据。对于符合SO条件的手术,记录术前和术中因素,包括:结石负荷、术前是否放置支架、手术时间、是否使用通道鞘以及是否进行了SO。回顾发病率数据,包括:术后事件、患者因烦人的症状来电、计划外复诊以及30天内的入院情况。

在研究期间共进行了250例URSL手术,其中106例(42.4%)符合SO条件。60例(24.0%)进行了SO,符合该算法的比例为56.7%。SO组在30天内没有再次入院或再次手术的情况。SO组术后事件发生率较低(16.7%对34.8%,P = 0.03),计划外复诊率(8.3%对17.4%,P = 0.16)和30天再入院率(0.0%对6.5%,P = 0.08)在SO组也较低,尽管未达到统计学显著性。分析还显示SO对计划外复诊有保护作用(优势比0.43,95%置信区间0.13 - 1.42,P = 0.17),尽管这也没有统计学显著性。术后事件与结石负荷、手术时间或术前是否放置支架之间未发现统计学显著关联。

我们提供了一种定义SO指征的算法。在相当一部分URSL手术中SO是安全的,并且谨慎进行SO似乎可以减少术后事件。IQR:四分位数间距;LUTS:下尿路症状;OR:优势比;SO:支架遗漏;URSL:输尿管镜碎石术;YAG:钇铝石榴石

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a7/6711146/dc12fefbe254/TAJU_A_1614243_F0001_C.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验