Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; GEICAM (Grupo GEICAM de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Oct;120:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Changes in the clinical subtype (CS) and intrinsic subtype (IS) between breast cancer (BC) metastases and corresponding primary tumours have been reported. However, their relationship with tumour genomic changes remains poorly characterised. Here, we analysed the association between genomic remodelling and subtype conversion in paired primary and metastatic BC samples.
A total of 57 paired primary and metastatic tumours from GEICAM/2009-03 (ConvertHER, NCT01377363) study participants with centrally assessed CS (n = 57) and IS (n = 46) were analysed. Targeted capture and next-generation sequencing of 202 genes on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples was performed. The cancer cell fraction (CCF) of mutations in primary and metastatic pairs was estimated as a surrogate of tumour clonal architecture. Changes in mutation CCF between matched primary and metastatic tumours were analysed in the presence or absence of subtype conversion.
CS conversion occurred in 24.6% and IS conversion occurred in 36.9% of metastases. Primary tumours and metastases had a median of 11 (range, 3-29) and 9 (range, 1-38) mutations, respectively (P = 0.05). Overall, mutations in metastases showed a higher estimated CCF than in primary tumours (median CCF, 0.51 and 0.47, respectively; P = 0.042), consistent with increased clonal homogeneity. The increase in mutation CCF was significant in CS-converted (P = 0.04) but not in IS-converted (P = 0.48) metastases. Clonal remodelling was highest in metastases from hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive tumours (P = 0.006).
Mutations in BC metastases showed significantly higher estimated CCF than primary tumours. CCF changes were more prominent in metastases with CS conversion. Our findings suggest that changes in BC subtypes are linked to clonal remodelling during BC evolution.
乳腺癌(BC)转移灶与其相应原发灶的临床亚型(CS)和内在亚型(IS)变化已有报道。然而,它们与肿瘤基因组变化的关系仍未得到充分描述。在此,我们分析了配对原发和转移性 BC 样本中肿瘤基因组重塑与亚型转换之间的关系。
共分析了来自 GEICAM/2009-03(ConvertHER,NCT01377363)研究参与者的 57 对配对原发和转移性肿瘤,这些肿瘤的 CS(n=57)和 IS(n=46)经中心评估。对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋样本进行了 202 个基因的靶向捕获和下一代测序。突变的肿瘤细胞分数(CCF)估计为肿瘤克隆结构的替代物。在存在或不存在亚型转换的情况下,分析了配对的原发和转移性肿瘤之间的突变 CCF 变化。
24.6%的转移灶发生 CS 转换,36.9%的转移灶发生 IS 转换。原发肿瘤和转移灶的中位数分别为 11(范围,3-29)和 9(范围,1-38)个突变(P=0.05)。总体而言,转移灶的突变显示出比原发肿瘤更高的估计 CCF(中位数 CCF,分别为 0.51 和 0.47;P=0.042),这与克隆同质性增加一致。CS 转换的转移灶中的突变 CCF 增加具有统计学意义(P=0.04),而 IS 转换的转移灶中则没有(P=0.48)。激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子 2(HER2)阳性肿瘤的转移灶的克隆重塑程度最高(P=0.006)。
BC 转移灶的突变显示出比原发肿瘤更高的估计 CCF。CS 转换的转移灶中的 CCF 变化更为显著。我们的研究结果表明,BC 亚型的变化与 BC 进化过程中的克隆重塑有关。