• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用化工企业化学品事故替代指标开发事故概率指数。

Development of Accident Probability Index Using Surrogate Indicators of Chemical Accidents in Chemical Plants.

机构信息

Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.

Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 5;16(18):3271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183271.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16183271
PMID:31492047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6766034/
Abstract

To reduce damage caused by chemical accidents, it is important to establish a prevention system for chemical accidents. The first step in the prevention of chemical accidents is to screen the high-risk chemical plants. Risk index, one of the screening methods, can indirectly estimate the risk at each chemical plant. For calculating the risk index, the probability of an accident needs to be estimated, which requires complex calculation and confidential data from plants that are difficult to obtain. Therefore, we developed a new index, the accident probability index, to estimate accident probability in chemical plants using readily accessible data. We conducted a literature survey on the existing risk indices and interviewed chemical experts and government chemical managers to select surrogate indicators related to chemical accidents, and four indicators were chosen: hazardous characteristics of chemicals, handling volume, records of accident frequency, and national accident frequency of chemicals. We calculated the accident probability index for 4520 chemical plants, and index value means was 5.324 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.156, 7.493). An increase by 10 in the index value denoted a 1.06-fold (95% CI: 1.04, 1.08) increase in the odds ratio for actual accident occurrence. The accident frequency of the fourth quartile of the index value was 4.30 times (95% CI: 1.72, 10.75) higher than those of the first quartile.

摘要

为了减少化学事故造成的损失,建立化学事故预防体系非常重要。化学事故预防的第一步是筛选高危化工企业。风险指数是筛选方法之一,它可以间接估计每个化工企业的风险。在计算风险指数时,需要估计事故发生的概率,这需要复杂的计算和化工企业难以获得的机密数据。因此,我们开发了一种新的指数,即事故概率指数,利用易于获得的数据来估计化工企业的事故概率。我们对现有的风险指数进行了文献调查,并采访了化工专家和政府化工管理人员,以选择与化学事故相关的替代指标,最终选择了四个指标:化学品的危险特性、处理量、事故频率记录和国家化学品事故频率。我们计算了 4520 家化工企业的事故概率指数,指数值平均值为 5.324(95%置信区间:3.156,7.493)。指数值增加 10,实际事故发生的比值比增加 1.06 倍(95%置信区间:1.04,1.08)。指数值第四四分位数的事故频率比第一四分位数高 4.30 倍(95%置信区间:1.72,10.75)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/0151858c864e/ijerph-16-03271-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/f6d1ff9a8bc6/ijerph-16-03271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/d6279eaf1689/ijerph-16-03271-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/92b35786e018/ijerph-16-03271-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/0151858c864e/ijerph-16-03271-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/f6d1ff9a8bc6/ijerph-16-03271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/d6279eaf1689/ijerph-16-03271-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/92b35786e018/ijerph-16-03271-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa73/6766034/0151858c864e/ijerph-16-03271-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Accident Probability Index Using Surrogate Indicators of Chemical Accidents in Chemical Plants.利用化工企业化学品事故替代指标开发事故概率指数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 5;16(18):3271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183271.
2
Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences.化学事故中的多米诺效应:主要特征和事故序列。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Nov 15;183(1-3):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.061. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
3
Development and Verification of a Risk Index for Evaluating the Chemical Accident Risk of Korean Chemical Enterprises.韩国化工企业化学品事故风险评估风险指数的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224409.
4
Feasibility Evaluation of Designated Quantities for Chemicals Requiring Preparation for Accidents in the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.韩国化学事故预防体系中要求事故预备的化学品指定数量的可行性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061927.
5
Changes in Risk in Medium Business Plating and Paint Manufacturing Plants following the Revision of the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.韩国化工事故预防体系修订后中型电镀和涂料制造工厂的风险变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211982.
6
Protective Behaviour of Citizens to Transport Accidents Involving Hazardous Materials: A Discrete Choice Experiment Applied to Populated Areas nearby Waterways.公民对涉及危险材料的运输事故的保护行为:一项应用于水道附近人口密集地区的离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 16;10(11):e0142507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142507. eCollection 2015.
7
Characteristics and Statistical Analysis of Large and above Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China from 2000 to 2020.2000 年至 2020 年中国较大及以上危险化学品事故特征及统计分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315603.
8
Hazardous Chemicals Road Transportation Accidents and the Corresponding Evacuation Events from 2012 to 2020 in China: A Review.2012 年至 2020 年中国危险化学品道路运输事故及相应的应急疏散事件回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215182.
9
Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea.韩国使用基于 GIS 的风险分析技术的危险化学品泄漏事故应急疏散计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;16(11):1948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111948.
10
A chemical accident cause text mining method based on improved accident triangle.基于改进事故三角形的化学事故成因文本挖掘方法
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17510-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on Dynamic Probability and Quantitative Risk Calculation Method of Domino Accident in Pool Fire in Chemical Storage Tank Area.化工储罐区池火灾多米诺事故动态概率及定量风险计算方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416483.
2
Ecological Effects of Benzyl Chloride on Different Korean Aquatic Indigenous Species Using an Artificial Stream Mesocosm Simulating a Chemical Spill.使用模拟化学品泄漏的人工溪流中宇宙研究苄基氯对不同韩国本土水生生物的生态影响。
Toxics. 2021 Dec 9;9(12):347. doi: 10.3390/toxics9120347.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Screening Method for Health Hazard Ranking and Scoring of Chemicals Using the Mahalanobis⁻Taguchi System.利用马氏距离-田口系统开发化学品健康危害分级和评分的筛选方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 10;15(10):2208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102208.
2
Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea.构建韩国土壤污染物质化学排序系统,以筛选优先土壤污染物。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Apr;184(4):2193-204. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2109-4. Epub 2011 May 15.
3
A new Hazardous Waste Index.
一种新的危险废物指数。
J Hazard Mater. 1999 May 31;67(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00006-0.
4
Acute toxicity in the rat following either oral or inhalation exposure.大鼠经口或吸入暴露后的急性毒性。
Toxicol Lett. 1991 May;56(3):317-26. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(91)90160-8.