Suppr超能文献

了解前节光学相干断层扫描和房角镜检查在闭角型青光眼评估中的诊断分歧。

Understanding diagnostic disagreement in angle closure assessment between anterior segment optical coherence tomography and gonioscopy.

机构信息

Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;104(6):795-799. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314672. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although being a more objective tool for assessment and follow-up of angle closure, reliability studies have reported a moderate diagnostic performance for anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) technologies when comparing with gonioscopy as the reference standard. We aim to determine factors associated with diagnostic disagreement in angle closure when assessed by anterior segment swept source OCT (SS-OCT, CASIA SS-1000; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and gonioscopy.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. A total of 2027 phakic subjects aged ≥50 years, with no relevant previous ophthalmic history, were consecutively recruited from a community polyclinic in Singapore. Gonioscopy and SS-OCT (128 radial scans) for the entire circumference of the angle were performed for each subject. A two-quadrant closed gonioscopic definition was used. On SS-OCT images, angle closure was defined as iridotrabecular contact (ITC) to the extent of ≥35%, ≥50% and ≥75% of the circumferential angle. Diagnostic disagreements between both methods, that is, false positives or overcalls and false negatives or undercalls were defined, respectively, as gonioscopic open/closed angles inversely assessed as closed/open by SS-OCT.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-two (14.7%) resulted in overcall results (false positives) when ≥50% of the angle circumference was closed using SS-OCT. These eyes had significantly wider (anterior chamber width, 11.7 vs 11.6 mm, p<0.001) and deeper (anterior chamber depth (ACD), 2.4 vs 2.2 mm, p<0.001) anterior chambers than eyes assessed by both methods as closed (true positives). Deeper ACD (OR 9.31) and lower lens vault (LV) (OR 0.04) were significantly associated with a false positive diagnosis in the multivariate analysis. Most of these cases had short (52.6%) or irregular (39%) ITC in SS-OCT images.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that anterior chamber dimensions, determined by ACD and LV, were factors significantly associated with diagnostic disagreement between anterior segment SS-OCT and gonioscopy in angle closure assessment.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管前节光学相干断层扫描(OCT)技术在评估和随访房角关闭方面是一种更客观的工具,但与作为参考标准的房角镜相比,其可靠性研究报告显示其具有中等的诊断性能。我们旨在确定在使用前节扫频源 OCT(SS-OCT,CASIA SS-1000;Tomey,Nagoya,日本)和房角镜评估房角关闭时,与诊断不一致相关的因素。

方法

横断面研究。从新加坡社区诊所连续招募了 2027 名年龄≥50 岁的无相关既往眼科病史的有晶状体受试者。对每位受试者进行房角镜和 SS-OCT(128 条径向扫描)的整个眼周进行检查。使用两象限闭合房角镜定义。在 SS-OCT 图像上,房角关闭定义为虹膜小梁接触(ITC)达到圆周角的 35%、50%和 75%以上。分别定义两种方法之间的诊断差异,即假阳性或过度诊断和假阴性或漏诊,分别定义为 SS-OCT 反向评估的房角镜开放/关闭角度为闭合/开放。

结果

当使用 SS-OCT 评估时,272 只眼(14.7%)的眼周角闭合达到 50%,结果为过度诊断(假阳性)。这些眼睛的前房宽度(前房宽度,11.7 与 11.6mm,p<0.001)和深度(前房深度(ACD),2.4 与 2.2mm,p<0.001)明显大于两种方法评估为闭合(真阳性)的眼睛。在多变量分析中,较深的 ACD(OR 9.31)和较低的晶状体 vault(LV)(OR 0.04)与假阳性诊断显著相关。这些病例中的大多数在 SS-OCT 图像中具有较短(52.6%)或不规则(39%)的 ITC。

结论

我们发现,前房深度和 LV 确定的前房尺寸是前节 SS-OCT 和房角镜在房角关闭评估中诊断不一致的显著相关因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验