General and Specialized Nursing Department, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, University of São Paulo, Bandeirantes Avenue, 3900. Campus - Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-902, Brazil.
Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, University Campus - Darcy Ribeiro b.b - Asa Norte, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):425-438. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05065-9. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
To identify the most effective dressing for covering long-term central venous catheter exit site to prevent catheter-related infections and skin irritation in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Systematic Review. The search was performed in the following electronic databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Google Scholar was used for the gray literature search.
Seven studies were included which tested different arrangements of dressings: sterilized gauze and adhesive tape with a transparent polyurethane film (n = 2), transparent polyurethane film with a different replacement interval frequency (n = 2), transparent polyurethane film with and without chlorhexidine released continuously by the dressing at the site of intravascular catheter insertion (n = 2), and dressings vs. no dressings (n = 1). The meta-analysis for catheter-related infection prevention showed no difference between type of dressing (RR 1.76, [95% CI 0.82; 3.75], I 0%) and for the replacement frequency at different intervals (RR 1.04, [95% CI 0.67; 1.61], I 0%). The meta-analysis for skin irritation evaluated the transparent polyurethane film replacement frequency and indicated that a longer dressing replacement interval (10 to 15 days) reduces the risk of developing this outcome (RR 0.71, 0.52; 0.96, 95% CI, I 24%).
Regarding the type of the dressing, there is no evidence indicating the best dressing. Although there is no evidence available for the ideal replacement frequency, the risk to develop skin irritation is reduced in longer dressing replacements intervals.
确定覆盖长期中心静脉导管出口部位的最有效敷料,以预防接受造血干细胞移植患者的导管相关性感染和皮肤刺激。
系统评价。在以下电子数据库中进行了检索:CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆中央、EMBASE、LILACS、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。Google Scholar 用于检索灰色文献。
纳入了 7 项研究,这些研究测试了不同的敷料排列方式:用消毒纱布和粘性胶带覆盖透明聚氨酯膜(n=2)、用不同更换间隔频率的透明聚氨酯膜(n=2)、在血管内导管插入部位持续释放氯己定的透明聚氨酯膜和无氯己定释放的透明聚氨酯膜(n=2)以及敷料与无敷料(n=1)。预防导管相关性感染的荟萃分析显示,敷料类型(RR 1.76,[95%CI 0.82;3.75],I²=0%)和不同间隔更换频率(RR 1.04,[95%CI 0.67;1.61],I²=0%)之间无差异。皮肤刺激的荟萃分析评估了透明聚氨酯膜更换频率,并表明较长的敷料更换间隔(10 至 15 天)可降低发生这种结果的风险(RR 0.71,0.52;0.96,95%CI,I²=24%)。
关于敷料类型,没有证据表明哪种敷料是最佳的。虽然尚无理想更换频率的证据,但较长的敷料更换间隔可降低皮肤刺激的风险。