Suppr超能文献

儿童花生过敏的长期舌下免疫治疗:脱敏的临床和免疫证据。

Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;144(5):1320-1326.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for 1 year has been shown to induce modest clinical desensitization in allergic children. Studies of oral immunotherapy, epicutaneous immunotherapy, and SLIT have suggested additional benefit with extended treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the safety, clinical effectiveness, and immunologic changes with long-term SLIT in children with peanut allergy.

METHODS

Children with peanut allergy aged 1 to 11 years underwent extended maintenance SLIT with 2 mg/d peanut protein for up to 5 years. Subjects with peanut skin test wheals of less than 5 mm and peanut-specific IgE levels of less than 15 kU/L were allowed to discontinue therapy early. Desensitization was assessed through a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with up to 5000 mg of peanut protein after completion of SLIT dosing. Sustained unresponsiveness was further assessed by using identical DBPCFCs after 2 to 4 weeks without peanut exposure.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 48 subjects completed 3 to 5 years of peanut SLIT, with 67% (32/48) successfully consuming 750 mg or more during DBPCFCs. Furthermore, 25% (12/48) passed the 5000-mg DBPCFC without clinical symptoms, with 10 of these 12 demonstrating sustained unresponsiveness after 2 to 4 weeks. Side effects were reported with 4.8% of doses, with transient oropharyngeal itching reported most commonly. Side effects requiring antihistamine treatment were uncommon (0.21%), and no epinephrine was administered. Peanut skin test wheals, peanut-specific IgE levels, and basophil activation decreased significantly, and peanut-specific IgG levels increased significantly after peanut SLIT.

CONCLUSION

Extended-therapy peanut SLIT provided clinically meaningful desensitization in the majority of children with peanut allergy that was balanced with ease of administration and a favorable safety profile.

摘要

背景

已有研究表明,花生舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)1 年可使过敏儿童产生适度的临床脱敏。口服免疫治疗、经皮免疫治疗和 SLIT 的研究表明,延长治疗时间可带来额外获益。

目的

我们旨在研究延长时间的 SLIT 在花生过敏儿童中的安全性、临床疗效和免疫学改变。

方法

1 至 11 岁的花生过敏儿童接受 2mg/d 花生蛋白的延长维持 SLIT,最长 5 年。对于花生皮肤试验风团小于 5mm 和花生特异性 IgE 水平小于 15kU/L 的患者,允许提前停止治疗。通过完成 SLIT 剂量后进行的双盲、安慰剂对照食物挑战(DBPCFC)来评估脱敏情况,最大剂量为 5000mg 花生蛋白。通过在没有花生暴露的情况下进行 2 至 4 周后的相同 DBPCFC 进一步评估持续性无反应。

结果

48 例患者中有 37 例完成了 3 至 5 年的花生 SLIT,67%(32/48)在 DBPCFC 中成功摄入 750mg 或更多。此外,25%(12/48)在没有临床症状的情况下通过了 5000mg DBPCFC,其中 10 例在 2 至 4 周后表现出持续性无反应。4.8%的剂量出现副作用,最常见的是短暂的咽痒。需要抗组胺治疗的副作用不常见(0.21%),且未使用肾上腺素。花生 SLIT 后,花生皮试风团、花生特异性 IgE 水平和嗜碱性粒细胞活化显著降低,花生特异性 IgG 水平显著升高。

结论

在大多数花生过敏儿童中,延长治疗时间的花生 SLIT 提供了有临床意义的脱敏作用,且具有易于管理和良好的安全性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
A review of sublingual immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy.舌下免疫疗法治疗花生过敏的综述。
J Food Allergy. 2024 Aug 1;7(1):14-20. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2025.7.250007. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
The Future of Food Allergy Management: Advancements in Therapies.食物过敏管理的未来:疗法的进步。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Apr;24(4):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01133-1. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
7
Recent advances in food allergen immunotherapy.食物过敏原免疫疗法的最新进展。
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2024 Aug;67(8):386-394. doi: 10.3345/cep.2023.01004. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

2
AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy.AR101 口服免疫疗法治疗花生过敏。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
5
Food Allergy.食物过敏
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Apr 5;20(5):17. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0624-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验