Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jun;151(6):1558-1565.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.036. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Studies on the efficacy of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are limited. The durability of desensitization after SLIT has not been well described.
We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-mg peanut SLIT and persistence of desensitization after SLIT discontinuation.
Challenge-proven peanut-allergic 1- to 11-year-old children were treated with open-label 4-mg peanut SLIT for 48 months. Desensitization after peanut SLIT was assessed by a 5000-mg double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). A novel randomly assigned avoidance period of 1 to 17 weeks was followed by the DBPCFC. Skin prick test results immunoglobulin levels, basophil activation test results, T1, T2, and IL-10 cytokines were measured longitudinally. Safety was assessed through patient-reported home diaries.
Fifty-four participants were enrolled and 47 (87%) completed peanut SLIT and the 48-month DBPCFC per protocol. The mean successfully consumed dose (SCD) during the DBPCFC increased from 48 to 2723 mg of peanut protein after SLIT (P < .0001), with 70% achieving clinically significant desensitization (SCD > 800 mg) and 36% achieving full desensitization (SCD = 5000 mg). Modeled median time to loss of clinically significant desensitization was 22 weeks. Peanut skin prick test; peanut-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgG4/IgE ratio; and peanut-stimulated basophil activation test, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IFN-γ, and IL-10 changed significantly compared with baseline, with changes seen as early as 6 months. Median rate of reaction per dose was 0.5%, with transient oropharyngeal itching being the most common, and there were no dosing symptoms requiring epinephrine.
In this open-label, prospective study, peanut SLIT was safe and induced clinically significant desensitization in most of the children, lasting more than 17 weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
关于花生舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)疗效的研究有限。SLIT 脱敏后的持久性尚未得到很好的描述。
我们旨在评估 4mg 剂量的花生 SLIT 的疗效和安全性,以及 SLIT 停药后脱敏的持续性。
对经过挑战证实的 1 至 11 岁花生过敏儿童进行为期 48 个月的开放标签 4mg 剂量的花生 SLIT 治疗。通过 5000mg 双盲、安慰剂对照食物挑战(DBPCFC)评估 SLIT 后的脱敏情况。随后进行为期 1 至 17 周的新型随机回避期,然后进行 DBPCFC。纵向测量皮肤点刺试验结果、免疫球蛋白水平、嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验结果、T1、T2 和 IL-10 细胞因子。通过患者报告的家庭日记评估安全性。
共纳入 54 名参与者,47 名(87%)按方案完成了花生 SLIT 和 48 个月的 DBPCFC。DBPCFC 期间成功摄入的平均剂量(SCD)从 SLIT 前的 48mg 增加到 2723mg 花生蛋白(P<0.0001),70%达到临床显著脱敏(SCD>800mg),36%达到完全脱敏(SCD=5000mg)。建模的中位时间到临床显著脱敏丧失为 22 周。与基线相比,花生皮试;花生特异性 IgE、IgG4 和 IgG4/IgE 比值;以及花生刺激的嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验、IL-4、IL-5、IL-13、IFN-γ 和 IL-10 均发生显著变化,早在 6 个月时就可以观察到变化。中位剂量反应率为 0.5%,最常见的是短暂的口咽瘙痒,没有需要肾上腺素的剂量症状。
在这项开放标签、前瞻性研究中,花生 SLIT 是安全的,大多数儿童在治疗停止后 17 周以上仍能产生临床显著的脱敏作用。