Department of Psychiatry, Srivenkatesheswaraa Medical College, Pondicherry, India.
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Dec;133:109385. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109385. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
With progress in neurosciences, neuroimaging and brain stimulation techniques, mental illnesses are now being seen as development anomalies at the molecular-structural level of synapses, resulting in abnormal cross wiring in areas responsible for complex cognitive and emotional processing. These include the multimodal association cortices situated in the prefrontal lobes, the insula in the temporal lobes, midline cortical structures, and their connections to the thalamus, amygdala and the basal ganglia. Three key networks have been identified which are considered the brain hubs for complex perceptual, emotional and behavior processing as well as introspection, theory of mind and self-awareness; namely the salience network (SN), the central executive network (CEN) and the default mode network (DMN). They function in an interconnected manner and involve in higher information processing of the entire internal and external milieu of the organism to determine the behavior strategies to be adopted. A triple network model of aberrant saliency mapping and cognitive dysfunction in psychopathology has been put forward recently and an attempt is being made to understand core cognitive networks and their dysfunction across multiple disorders including schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism and dementia. Against this background, the author would like to take the triple network dysfunction model a step further to hypothesize the following. 1. All or some of the three core networks (CEN, SN & DMN) are affected variably in psychiatric disorders, the severity and the nature of the clinical symptoms depending upon the degree of damage and the number of networks that are dysfunctional and whether that dysfunction is reversible or permanent. For example, in a condition like schizophrenia, all three networks would more or less be affected giving rise to plethora of symptoms like executive deficits, negative symptoms, abnormal salience and mood states. In milder conditions like anxiety and depressive disorders, on the other hand, the dysfunction is of a lesser degree and reversible. 2. These networks are the final common pathway through which a variety of internal or environment insults to the brains may act, the degree of damage and reversibility being determined by the critical period of brain development in which these occur. 3. The harmonious functioning of these core networks is what gives rise to the complex phenomenon of the mind in the brain.
随着神经科学、神经影像学和脑刺激技术的进步,精神疾病现在被视为突触的分子-结构水平上的发育异常,导致负责复杂认知和情感处理的区域出现异常的交叉连接。这些区域包括位于前额叶的多模态联合皮质、颞叶的脑岛、中线皮质结构以及它们与丘脑、杏仁核和基底神经节的连接。已经确定了三个关键网络,它们被认为是复杂感知、情感和行为处理以及内省、心理理论和自我意识的大脑枢纽;即显着性网络(SN)、中央执行网络(CEN)和默认模式网络(DMN)。它们以相互连接的方式运作,并参与生物体整个内部和外部环境的高级信息处理,以确定要采用的行为策略。最近提出了一种精神病理学中异常显着性映射和认知功能障碍的三重网络模型,并试图理解核心认知网络及其在包括精神分裂症、抑郁症、焦虑症、自闭症和痴呆症在内的多种疾病中的功能障碍。在此背景下,作者想进一步推进三重网络功能障碍模型,提出以下假设。
所有或部分三个核心网络(CEN、SN 和 DMN)在精神障碍中受到不同程度的影响,临床症状的严重程度和性质取决于功能障碍的网络数量以及功能障碍是否可逆或永久性。例如,在精神分裂症等情况下,所有三个网络或多或少都会受到影响,导致执行功能障碍、阴性症状、异常显着性和情绪状态等多种症状。另一方面,在焦虑症和抑郁症等较轻的情况下,功能障碍的程度较小且可逆。
这些网络是大脑内部或环境刺激的最终共同途径,损伤的程度和可逆性取决于这些刺激发生的大脑发育关键期。
这些核心网络的和谐运作是大脑中复杂心理现象产生的原因。