State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
New Phytol. 2019 Nov;224(3):1304-1315. doi: 10.1111/nph.16176. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
Interactions between mutualists, competitors, and antagonists have contrasting ecological effects that, sustained over generations, can influence micro- and macroevolution. Dissimilar benefits and costs for these interactions should cause contrasting co-diversification patterns between interacting clades, with prevalent co-speciation by mutualists, association loss by competitors, and host switching by antagonists. We assessed these expectations for a local assemblage of 26 fig species (Moraceae: Ficus), 26 species of mutualistic (pollinating), and 33 species of parasitic (galling) wasps (Chalcidoidea). Using newly acquired gene sequences, we inferred the phylogenies for all three clades. We then compared the three possible pairs of phylogenies to assess phylogenetic congruence and the relative frequencies of co-speciation, association duplication, switching, and loss. The paired phylogenies of pollinators with their mutualists and competitors were significantly congruent, unlike that of figs and their parasites. The distributions of macroevolutionary events largely agreed with expectations for mutualists and antagonists. By contrast, that for competitors involved relatively frequent association switching, as expected, but also unexpectedly frequent co-speciation. The latter result likely reflects the heterogeneous nature of competition among fig wasps. These results illustrate the influence of different interspecific interactions on co-diversification, while also revealing its dependence on specific characteristics of those interactions.
互利共生、竞争和拮抗相互作用具有相反的生态效应,这些效应持续作用于多个世代,会影响微观和宏观进化。这些相互作用的不同利益和成本应该导致相互作用的分类群之间出现相反的共同进化模式,互利共生者以共同物种形成为主,竞争者以关联丧失为主,而拮抗者以宿主转换为主。我们评估了这些期望对于本地的一个由 26 种榕属植物物种(桑科:榕属)、26 种互利共生(传粉)和 33 种寄生(瘿蜂)黄蜂(膜翅目:瘿蜂总科)组成的集合体的适用性。我们使用新获取的基因序列推断了所有三个分类群的系统发育。然后,我们比较了这三种可能的对系统发育,以评估系统发育一致性和共同物种形成、关联复制、转换和损失的相对频率。传粉者与其互利共生者和竞争者的成对系统发育显著一致,而榕属植物与其寄生者的系统发育则不一致。宏观进化事件的分布在很大程度上与互利共生者和拮抗者的预期一致。相比之下,竞争者的关联转换相对频繁,这是预期的,但也出乎意料地频繁出现共同物种形成。后者的结果可能反映了榕蜂之间竞争的异质性。这些结果说明了不同种间相互作用对共同进化的影响,同时也揭示了其对这些相互作用的特定特征的依赖性。