Berniger Romariz José Ary, Nonnemacher Cássio, Abreu Mylena, Dickel Segabinazi Joice, Bandeira Janete Shatkoski, Beltran Gerardo, Souza Andressa, Torres Iraci Ls, Caumo Wolnei
Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculdade de Medicina,Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul , Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre , Brazil.
J Pain Res. 2019 Aug 7;12:2487-2502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S199120. eCollection 2019.
The primary aim was to assess the psychometric properties (including internal consistency, construct validity, criterion validity, criterion-group validity and responsiveness) of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FOPQ) for adolescents (FOPQ-A) and parents (FOPQ-P) translated to Brazilian Portuguese (BrP). The secondary aim was to analyze the factor structures and their ability to identify subjects with chronic pain conditions and identify the relationship of the BrP FOPQ-A with saliva brain-derived neurotrophic-factor (BDNF).
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 286 adolescents aged 11 to 18 (257 healthy adolescents [157 females] and 29 adolescents with chronic pain [16 females]). Parents and adolescents completed the BrP-FOPQ. A team of experts translated the FOPQ according to international guidelines. Convergent validity and factor analysis were performed. Later, a subsample (n=146) was used to correlate the BrP-FOPQ-A with saliva BDNF.
The BrP-FOPQ for adolescents and parents presented strong psychometric properties (Cronbach's α equal to 0.92 and 0.91, respectively). BrP-FOPQ-A confirmatory factor analysis yielded a two-factor structure while the factorial analyses of BrP-FOPQ-P demonstrated that the best solution was a three-structure factorial. The BrP-FOPQ-P scores in healthy adolescents and those in chronic pain conditions was 34.13 (16.71) vs 43.14 (18.08), respectively. A generalized mixed model demonstrated that the scores in the BrP-FOPQ-A are higher in those with chronic pain conditions compared to healthy subjects (29.20 [12.77] vs 33.80 [10.76], respectively; Wald χ= 17.80; =1, <0.0001). The model revealed that the BDNF was positively correlated with the score of BrP-FOPQ-A and subjects with chronic pain showed higher levels of BDNF.
The BrP-FOPQ scores for adolescents and parents were found to be psychometrically robust and reliable instruments, with primary evidence of validity. Higher scores on the BrP-FOPQ-A were correlated positively with saliva BDNF and permitted the identification of subjects with chronic pain conditions.
主要目的是评估翻译成巴西葡萄牙语(BrP)的青少年恐惧疼痛问卷(FOPQ - A)和家长版恐惧疼痛问卷(FOPQ - P)的心理测量特性(包括内部一致性、结构效度、效标效度、效标组效度和反应性)。次要目的是分析因子结构及其识别慢性疼痛患者的能力,并确定BrP FOPQ - A与唾液脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)之间的关系。
对286名11至18岁的青少年进行了一项横断面研究(257名健康青少年[157名女性]和29名患有慢性疼痛的青少年[16名女性])。家长和青少年完成了BrP - FOPQ。一个专家团队根据国际指南对FOPQ进行了翻译。进行了收敛效度和因子分析。随后,使用一个子样本(n = 146)将BrP - FOPQ - A与唾液BDNF进行关联。
青少年版和家长版的BrP - FOPQ均呈现出强大的心理测量特性(Cronbach's α分别等于0.92和0.91)。BrP - FOPQ - A的验证性因子分析产生了一个双因子结构,而BrP - FOPQ - P的因子分析表明最佳解决方案是一个三结构因子。健康青少年和慢性疼痛患者的BrP - FOPQ - P得分分别为34.13(16.71)和43.14(18.08)。一个广义混合模型表明,与健康受试者相比,患有慢性疼痛的受试者的BrP - FOPQ - A得分更高(分别为29.20 [12.77]和33.80 [10.76];Wald χ = 17.80; = 1,<0.0001)。该模型显示,BDNF与BrP - FOPQ - A得分呈正相关,患有慢性疼痛的受试者BDNF水平更高。
发现青少年版和家长版的BrP - FOPQ得分在心理测量上是稳健且可靠的工具,并具有有效性的初步证据。BrP - FOPQ - A得分较高与唾液BDNF呈正相关,并能够识别出患有慢性疼痛的受试者。