Gelalis Ioannis, Gkiatas Ioannis, Spiliotis Antonios, Papadopoulos Dimitrios, Pakos Emilios, Vekris Marios, Korompilias Anastasios
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):657-669. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_119_17.
A systemic review of thermal annular procedures (TAPs) and percutaneous disk decompression procedures (PDDPs) for the treatment of discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) was conducted.
The objective of this review is to evaluate and to compare the effectiveness of TAPs and PDDPs in treating discogenic CLBP and to assess the frequency of complications associated with those procedures.
English-language journal articles were identified through computerized searches of the PubMed database and bibliographies of identified articles and review papers. Articles were selected for inclusion if percutaneous minimally invasive procedures were the treatment options for patients with CLBP and if follow-up outcome data included evaluations of back pain severity, functional improvement, and/or incidence of complications. For this review, 27 studies were included.
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) procedure in properly selected patients may eliminate or delay the need for surgical intervention for an extended period, whereas few adverse effects have been reported. In contrast to IDET, there is far less literature on the effectiveness of radiofrequency annuloplasty and intradiscal biacuplasty procedures. Nucleoplasty is a potentially effective treatment option for patients with contained disc herniation, while the procedure is well tolerated. Increased success rates have been found for percutaneous laser disc decompression and automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy in strictly selected patients.
These procedures can be effective and may obviate the need for surgery completely. Further prospective randomized sham-controlled trials with higher quality of evidence are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these procedures.
对用于治疗椎间盘源性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的热环周手术(TAPs)和经皮椎间盘减压手术(PDDPs)进行了系统评价。
本综述的目的是评估和比较TAPs和PDDPs治疗椎间盘源性CLBP的有效性,并评估与这些手术相关的并发症发生率。
通过计算机检索PubMed数据库以及已识别文章和综述论文的参考文献来确定英文期刊文章。如果经皮微创手术是CLBP患者的治疗选择,并且随访结果数据包括对背痛严重程度、功能改善和/或并发症发生率的评估,则选择纳入文章。本综述纳入了27项研究。
在适当选择的患者中,椎间盘内电热疗法(IDET)手术可能会在较长时间内消除或延迟手术干预的需要,而且报道的不良反应很少。与IDET相反,关于射频环成形术和椎间盘内热凝术有效性的文献要少得多。髓核成形术对于包容性椎间盘突出症患者是一种潜在有效的治疗选择,而且该手术耐受性良好。在严格选择的患者中,经皮激光椎间盘减压术和自动经皮腰椎间盘切除术的成功率有所提高。
这些手术可能有效,并且可能完全避免手术的需要。需要进一步开展具有更高证据质量的前瞻性随机假对照试验来证实这些手术的疗效。