Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Dr Capó-Lugo); Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark (Ms Kisala and Drs Boulton and Tulsky); Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas, Austin (Dr Choi); Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Heinemann); and Departments of Physical Therapy and Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (Dr Tulsky).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Sep-Oct;34(5):340-352. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000511.
To describe the development and field testing of the patient-reported outcome measures of Mobility and Upper Extremity function from the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) measurement system, and to evaluate the use of computer adaptive testing.
Five rehabilitation facilities funded as part of the TBI Model Systems network.
Individuals with complicated mild, moderate, or severe traumatic brain injury (n = 590).
Not available.
TBI-QOL Mobility and Upper Extremity item banks.
Item response theory and factor analyses supported the unidimensionality of the Mobility and Upper Extremity banks. Descriptive statistics showed a ceiling effect for both measures. Simulated computer adaptive tests (CATs) showed that measurement precision was maintained across administration formats for both measures. The Upper Extremity CAT showed a loss of precision for individuals without impairment and that a higher number of items were required to achieve sufficiently precise measurement, compared to the Mobility CAT.
The TBI-QOL Upper Extremity and Mobility item banks achieved good breadth of coverage, particularly among those individuals who have experienced some degree of functional limitation. The use of CAT administration minimizes respondent burden, while allowing for the comprehensive assessment of adults with TBI. The combined use of the TBI-QOL with performance-based measures could guide the development of targeted rehabilitation treatments.
描述创伤性脑损伤生活质量(TBI-QOL)测量系统中移动性和上肢功能的患者报告结局测量的开发和现场测试,并评估计算机自适应测试的使用。
作为 TBI 模型系统网络一部分资助的五个康复机构。
患有复杂轻度、中度或重度创伤性脑损伤的个体(n = 590)。
不适用。
TBI-QOL 移动性和上肢项目库。
项目反应理论和因子分析支持移动性和上肢银行的单维性。描述性统计数据显示这两种测量方法都存在上限效应。模拟计算机自适应测试(CAT)表明,两种测量方法的管理格式都保持了测量精度。与移动性 CAT 相比,上肢 CAT 对无损伤个体的精度降低,并且需要更多的项目来实现足够精确的测量。
TBI-QOL 上肢和移动性项目库具有良好的广度覆盖,特别是在那些经历过某种程度功能限制的个体中。CAT 管理的使用可以减轻受访者的负担,同时允许对 TBI 成人进行全面评估。TBI-QOL 与基于表现的测量方法的联合使用可以指导有针对性的康复治疗的发展。