• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松单药治疗与头孢呋辛加庆大霉素联合方案治疗严重细菌感染的比较研究:疗效、安全性及对粪便菌群的影响

Comparative study of ceftriaxone monotherapy versus a combination regimen of cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious bacterial infections: the efficacy, safety and effect on fecal flora.

作者信息

Hoepelman I M, Rozenberg-Arska M, Verhoef J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1988;34 Suppl 1:21-9. doi: 10.1159/000238643.

DOI:10.1159/000238643
PMID:3149929
Abstract

To assess the efficacy of once daily monotherapy relative to standard combination antibiotic therapy for the initial management of patients suspected of serious bacterial infections, we conducted a randomized trial comparing ceftriaxone (Rocephin) with a combination of cefuroxime plus gentamicin. Of 105 patients, 53 were treated with ceftriaxone alone and 52 with the combination; 13 patients were considered not evaluable. 42 of 53 patients given ceftriaxone and 33 of 52 given cefuroxime plus gentamicin responded to treatment (p = 0.07). Three patients given ceftriaxone and 6 who received gentamicin plus cefuroxime died (p = 0.28). Definite bacterial infections were identified in 67 patients; of the evaluable patients with a definite infection 27 of 29 who received ceftriaxone and 21 of 31 who were treated with the combination were cured (p = 0.01). No difference was found in the number of side effects. However, therapy had to be discontinued due to treatment failure, an adverse effect or death in 1 of 33 patients given ceftriaxone and in 11 of 34 given the combination (p = 0.002). Ceftriaxone was found to have an impact on the count of E. coli in intestinal microflora. Changes in normal bacterial composition did not lead to the overgrowth with resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas, however, colonization by yeast was observed. Using ceftriaxone reduced the cost of antimicrobial therapy per patient by 107 pounds (US$ 183). Moreover, the total time save per patient due to decreased nursing and drug administration time per day was 40 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为评估每日一次单药治疗与标准联合抗生素治疗对疑似严重细菌感染患者初始治疗的疗效,我们进行了一项随机试验,比较头孢曲松(罗氏芬)与头孢呋辛加庆大霉素联合用药。105例患者中,53例单独接受头孢曲松治疗,52例接受联合用药治疗;13例患者被认为不可评估。接受头孢曲松治疗的53例患者中有42例、接受头孢呋辛加庆大霉素治疗的52例患者中有33例对治疗有反应(p = 0.07)。接受头孢曲松治疗的3例患者和接受庆大霉素加头孢呋辛治疗的6例患者死亡(p = 0.28)。67例患者确诊为细菌感染;在确诊感染的可评估患者中,接受头孢曲松治疗的29例中有27例治愈,接受联合用药治疗的31例中有21例治愈(p = 0.01)。副作用数量无差异。然而,由于治疗失败、不良反应或死亡,接受头孢曲松治疗的33例患者中有1例、接受联合用药治疗的34例患者中有11例不得不停止治疗(p = 0.002)。发现头孢曲松对肠道微生物群中的大肠杆菌数量有影响。正常细菌组成的变化未导致耐药肠杆菌科或假单胞菌过度生长,然而,观察到有酵母菌定植。使用头孢曲松使每位患者的抗菌治疗费用降低了107英镑(183美元)。此外,由于每天护理和给药时间减少,每位患者节省的总时间为40分钟。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
Comparative study of ceftriaxone monotherapy versus a combination regimen of cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious bacterial infections: the efficacy, safety and effect on fecal flora.头孢曲松单药治疗与头孢呋辛加庆大霉素联合方案治疗严重细菌感染的比较研究:疗效、安全性及对粪便菌群的影响
Chemotherapy. 1988;34 Suppl 1:21-9. doi: 10.1159/000238643.
2
Comparison of once daily ceftriaxone with gentamicin plus cefuroxime for treatment of serious bacterial infections.每日一次头孢曲松与庆大霉素加头孢呋辛治疗严重细菌感染的比较。
Lancet. 1988 Jun 11;1(8598):1305-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92121-6.
3
A comparison of ceftriaxone and cefuroxime for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与头孢呋辛治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):141-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199001183220301.
4
Ceftriaxone once daily for four weeks compared with ceftriaxone plus gentamicin once daily for two weeks for treatment of endocarditis due to penicillin-susceptible streptococci. Endocarditis Treatment Consortium Group.头孢曲松每日一次,疗程四周,与头孢曲松加庆大霉素每日一次,疗程两周,用于治疗青霉素敏感链球菌所致的心内膜炎。心内膜炎治疗联盟组。
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Dec;27(6):1470-4. doi: 10.1086/515038.
5
Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.美罗培南与头孢呋辛加庆大霉素治疗老年患者严重感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1233-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1233.
6
Treatment of neonatal sepsis with ceftriaxone/gentamicin and with azlocillin/gentamicin: a clinical comparison of efficacy and tolerability.
Chemotherapy. 1988;34(2):158-63. doi: 10.1159/000238564.
7
A randomized monocentric trial in febrile neutropenic patients: ceftriaxone and gentamicin vs cefepime and gentamicin.
Ann Hematol. 2002 Jan;81(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00277-001-0392-9. Epub 2001 Dec 14.
8
Oral gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days compared with sequential therapy with i.v. ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime (maximum of 10 days) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.口服吉米沙星每日一次,疗程5天,与静脉注射头孢曲松/口服头孢呋辛序贯治疗(最长10天)用于治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的住院患者的比较。
Respir Med. 2003 Mar;97(3):242-9. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2003.1435.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中比头孢曲松加庆大霉素更有效:一项随机对照比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jun;11(6):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0463-7. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
[Multicentre, randomized, prospective and comparative study of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefuroxime in treating mild to moderate respiratory tract infection].头孢曲松、头孢噻肟和头孢呋辛治疗轻至中度呼吸道感染的多中心、随机、前瞻性对照研究
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1998 Sep;21(9):528-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.联合使用抗生素对耐药性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Elife. 2024 Dec 20;13:RP93740. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93740.
2
The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.联合使用抗生素对耐药性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 28:2023.07.10.23292374. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.10.23292374.
3
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.
β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
4
Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.β-内酰胺类药物与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗癌症中性粒细胞减少症患者的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 29;2013(6):CD003038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003038.pub2.
5
Prospective evaluation of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on gastrointestinal yeast colonization of humans.广谱抗生素对人类胃肠道酵母菌定植影响的前瞻性评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):51-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.1.51.
6
Effects of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents on yeast colonization of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice.广谱抗菌剂对小鼠胃肠道酵母菌定植的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Dec;34(12):2420-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.12.2420.