Jaspers C A, Kieft H, Speelberg B, Buiting A, van Marwijk Kooij M, Ruys G J, Vincent H H, Vermeulen M C, Olink A G, Hoepelman I M
Department of Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1233-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1233.
In this multicenter study, the efficacy of and tolerability for meropenem were compared with those for the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole) for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in patients > or = 65 years of age. A total of 79 patients were randomized; thirty-nine received meropenem (1 g/8 h), and 40 received cefuroxime (1.5 g/8 h) plus gentamicin (4 mg/kg of body weight daily) for 5 to 10 days. Metronidazole (500 mg/6 h) could be added to the cefuroxime-gentamicin regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (n = 10). Seventy patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; the primary diagnoses were as follows: pneumonia in 41 patients (20 treated with meropenem, 21 treated with cefuroxime-gentamicin), intra-abdominal infection in 10 patients (7 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin-metronidazole), urinary tract infection (UTI) in 11 patients (6 meropenem, 5 cefuroxime-gentamicin), sepsis syndrome in 7 patients (4 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin), and "other" in 1 patient (cefuroxime-gentamicin). The pathogens isolated from 18 patients with bacteremia were as follows: Staphylococcus spp. (n = 2), Streptococcus spp. (n = 2), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 11), and Bacteroides spp. (n = 3). A satisfactory clinical response at the end of therapy was achieved in 26 of 37 (70%) and 24 of 33 (73%) evaluable patients treated with meropenem and combination therapy, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 23 of 31 (74%) and 21 of 28 (75%) evaluable patients with infections other than UTIs, respectively. A satisfactory microbiological response occurred in 15 of 22 (68%) patients in the meropenem group compared with 12 of 19 (63%) treated with combination therapy. Renal failure occurred during therapy in 2 of 39 (5%) meropenem recipients compared with 5 of 40 (13%) of those treated with combination therapy. The findings in this small study indicate that meropenem is as efficacious for and as well tolerated by elderly patients as the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole).
在这项多中心研究中,对美罗培南与头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素(±甲硝唑)联合用药治疗65岁及以上患者严重细菌感染的疗效和耐受性进行了比较。共有79例患者被随机分组;39例接受美罗培南(1g/8小时)治疗,40例接受头孢呋辛(1.5g/8小时)加庆大霉素(每日4mg/kg体重)治疗5至10天。甲硝唑(500mg/6小时)可添加到头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素治疗方案中用于治疗腹腔内感染(n = 10)。70例患者可评估临床疗效;主要诊断如下:41例肺炎患者(20例接受美罗培南治疗,21例接受头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素治疗),10例腹腔内感染患者(7例美罗培南,3例头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素 - 甲硝唑),11例尿路感染(UTI)患者(6例美罗培南,5例头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素),7例脓毒症综合征患者(4例美罗培南,3例头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素),1例“其他”患者(头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素)。从18例菌血症患者中分离出的病原体如下:葡萄球菌属(n = 2),链球菌属(n = 2),肠杆菌科成员(n = 11),拟杆菌属(n = 3)。接受美罗培南治疗和联合治疗的可评估患者中,分别有37例中的26例(70%)和33例中的24例(73%)在治疗结束时获得了满意的临床反应。在除UTI以外的感染患者中,接受美罗培南治疗和联合治疗的可评估患者分别有31例中的23例(74%)和28例中的21例(75%)取得了临床成功。美罗培南组22例患者中有15例(68%)出现了满意的微生物学反应,而联合治疗组19例患者中有12例(63%)出现了该反应。美罗培南治疗组39例患者中有2例(5%)在治疗期间发生肾衰竭,而联合治疗组40例患者中有5例(13%)发生肾衰竭。这项小型研究的结果表明,美罗培南在老年患者中的疗效和耐受性与头孢呋辛 - 庆大霉素(±甲硝唑)联合用药相当。