The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):612-618. doi: 10.1177/1558944719873150. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
Indications for replantation following traumatic digit amputations are more liberal in the pediatric population than in adults, but delineation of patient selection within pediatrics and their outcomes have yet to be elucidated. This study uses a national pediatric database to evaluate patient characteristics and injury patterns involved in replantation and their outcomes. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kid's Inpatient Database was queried for traumatic amputations of the thumb and finger from 2000 to 2012. Participants were separated into those who underwent replantation and those who underwent amputation. Patients undergoing replantation were further divided into those requiring revision amputation and/or microvascular revision. Patient age, sex, insurance, digit(s) affected, charges, length of stay, and complications were extracted for each patient. Traumatic digit amputations occurred in 3090 patients, with 1950 (63.1%) undergoing revision amputation and 1140 (36.9%) undergoing replantation. Younger patients, those with thumb injuries, females, and those covered under private insurance were significantly more likely to undergo replantation. Cost, length of stay, and in-hospital complications were significantly greater in replantation patients than in those who had undergone amputation. Following replantation, 237 patients (20.8%) underwent revision amputation and 209 (18.3%) underwent vascular revision, after which 58 required revision amputation. Risk of revision following replantation involved older patients, males, and procedures done recently. Pediatric patients who underwent replantation were significantly younger, female, had thumb injuries, and were covered by private insurance. Our findings demonstrate that in addition to injury factors, demographics play a significant role in the decision for finger replantation and its outcomes.
儿童创伤性断指再植的适应证比成人更广泛,但儿童患者的选择标准及其结果仍有待阐明。本研究利用国家儿科数据库评估再植患者的特征和损伤模式及其结果。从 2000 年至 2012 年,使用医疗保健成本和利用项目儿童住院数据库查询拇指和手指创伤性截肢的患者。将参与者分为接受再植术和接受截肢术的患者。接受再植术的患者进一步分为需要修正性截肢术和/或微血管修正术的患者。提取每位患者的年龄、性别、保险、受影响的手指、费用、住院时间和并发症。3090 例患者发生创伤性断指,1950 例(63.1%)接受修正性截肢术,1140 例(36.9%)接受再植术。年轻患者、拇指受伤患者、女性患者和私人保险患者更有可能接受再植术。与接受截肢术的患者相比,再植术患者的费用、住院时间和院内并发症明显更高。再植术后,237 例(20.8%)患者接受修正性截肢术,209 例(18.3%)患者接受血管修正术,58 例患者需要再次修正性截肢术。再植术后需要修正的风险涉及年龄较大的患者、男性和近期手术。接受再植术的儿科患者明显更年轻、女性、拇指受伤和私人保险。我们的研究结果表明,除了损伤因素外,人口统计学因素在手指再植术的决策及其结果中起着重要作用。