• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国范围内对英格兰和威尔士双相情感障碍患者使用 2005 年精神能力法案的障碍进行的调查和分析。

National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 mental capacity act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK.

Professor of Mental Health Law, School of Law and Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2020 Apr;29(2):131-138. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613
PMID:28644738
Abstract

: The Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) provides a legal framework for advance planning for both health and welfare in England and Wales for people if they lose mental capacity, for example, through mania or severe depression.: To determine the proportion of people with bipolar disorder (BD) who utilise advance planning, their experience of using it and barriers to its implementation.: National survey of people with clinical diagnosis of BD of their knowledge, use and experience of the MCA. Thematically analysed qualitative interviews with maximum variance sample of people with BD.: A total of 544 respondents with BD participated in the survey; 18 in the qualitative study. 403 (74.1%) believed making plans about their personal welfare if they lost capacity to be very important. A total of 199 (36.6%) participants knew about the MCA. A total 54 (10%), 62 (11%) and 21 (4%) participants made advanced decisions to refuse treatment, advance statements and lasting power of attorney, respectively. Barriers included not understanding its different forms, unrealistic expectations and advance plans ignored by services.: In BD, the demand for advance plans about welfare with loss of capacity was high, but utilisation of the MCA was low with barriers at service user, clinician and organisation levels.

摘要

《精神能力法案(2005)》(MCA)为英格兰和威尔士的人们提供了一个法律框架,用于在他们失去精神能力(例如通过躁狂或严重抑郁)时预先规划健康和福利。

目的是确定有多少双相情感障碍(BD)患者利用了预先规划,他们使用该规划的经验以及实施该规划的障碍。

对有临床诊断的 BD 患者进行全国性调查,了解他们对 MCA 的了解、使用和经验。对具有最大方差的 BD 患者进行了主题分析的定性访谈。

共有 544 名 BD 患者参加了调查,18 名参加了定性研究。403 名(74.1%)患者认为如果失去能力,为个人福利制定计划非常重要。共有 199 名(36.6%)参与者了解 MCA。共有 54 名(10%)、62 名(11%)和 21 名(4%)参与者分别做出了拒绝治疗、预先声明和持久授权书的预先决定。障碍包括不了解其不同形式、不切实际的期望以及服务机构忽略的预先计划。

在 BD 中,对丧失能力时的福利预先计划的需求很高,但 MCA 的利用率很低,存在服务使用者、临床医生和组织层面的障碍。

相似文献

1
National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 mental capacity act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales.全国范围内对英格兰和威尔士双相情感障碍患者使用 2005 年精神能力法案的障碍进行的调查和分析。
J Ment Health. 2020 Apr;29(2):131-138. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users.支持或反对双相情感障碍患者自我约束指令的原因:来自英国服务使用者调查回应的定性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):599-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00115-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
3
4
Lasting powers of attorney.持久授权书
Br J Community Nurs. 2018 Nov 2;23(11):567-569. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.11.567.
5
The Mental Capacity Act 2005.2005年《精神能力法案》
Clin Med (Lond). 2006 Mar-Apr;6(2):169-73. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-2-169.
6
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
7
Combining technical and expert-by-experience knowledge in the quest for personal recovery from bipolar disorder: a qualitative study.结合技术和专家经验知识,追求双相情感障碍的个人康复:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 26;19(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2357-3.
8
The Mental Capacity Act 2005: implications for dietetic practice.《2005年精神能力法案》:对饮食实践的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007 Aug;20(4):302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00795.x.
9
Embedding the Mental Capacity Act into clinical practice in England and Wales.将《精神能力法案》融入英格兰和威尔士的临床实践。
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):416-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr044. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
Geriatricians' views of advance decisions and their use in clinical care in England: qualitative study.英国老年医学专家对预先医疗指示的看法及其在临床护理中的应用:定性研究
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):450-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr025. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.将精神科预立医疗指示纳入患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索前景与局限
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e68549. doi: 10.2196/68549.
2
Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study.黑非洲人和加勒比人群体的预先指示(AdStAC):一项实施研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 17;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04825-6.
3
Preparing for Mental Health Act reform: Pilot study of co-produced implementation strategies for Advance Choice Documents.
为《精神健康法》改革做准备:预先选择文件共同制定实施策略的试点研究
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Jul 7;7:182. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17947.1. eCollection 2022.
4
COVID-19 Vaccination in those with mental health difficulties: A guide to assist decision-making in England, Scotland, and Wales.精神健康困难人群的 COVID-19 疫苗接种:英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士决策辅助指南。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Oct;62(4):275-282. doi: 10.1177/00258024221086054. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Advance Decision Making in Bipolar: A Systematic Review.双相情感障碍中的预先决策制定:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 16;11:538107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.538107. eCollection 2020.
6
The PACT advance decision-making template: preparing for Mental Health Act reforms with co-production, focus groups and consultation.《PACT 决策前置模板:通过共同制作、焦点小组和咨询为精神卫生法改革做准备》
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;71:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101563. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
Psychiatric Advance Directives Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities: Why Advance Instructions Should Be Able to Override Current Preferences.《残疾人权利公约》下的精神科预先指示:为何预先指示应能够推翻当前的偏好。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 11;10:631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00631. eCollection 2019.
8
Advance decisions to refuse treatment and suicidal behaviour in emergency care: 'it's very much a step into the unknown'.急诊护理中拒绝治疗的预先决定与自杀行为:“这很大程度上是迈向未知的一步”。
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jun 13;5(4):e50. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.42.
9
Advance decision-making in mental health - Suggestions for legal reform in England and Wales.心理健康预先决策 - 英格兰和威尔士法律改革建议。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:162-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
Management of patients with an advance decision and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review.有预先决定和自杀行为的患者的管理:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e023978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023978.