Suppr超能文献

促进自行车出行在瑞典斯德哥尔摩作为一种主动交通方式的健康经济评估。

Health economic assessment of a scenario to promote bicycling as active transport in Stockholm, Sweden.

机构信息

Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e030466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030466.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a health economic evaluation of a proposed investment in urban bicycle infrastructure in Stockholm County, Sweden.

DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness analysis is undertaken from a healthcare perspective. Investment costs over a 50-year life cycle are offset by averted healthcare costs and compared with estimated long-term impacts on morbidity, quantified in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The results are re-calculated under different assumptions to model the effects of uncertainty.

SETTING

The Municipality of Stockholm (population 2.27 million) committed funds for bicycle path infrastructure with the aim of achieving a 15% increase in the number of bicycle commuters by 2030. This work is based on a previously constructed scenario, in which individual registry data on home and work address and a transport model allocation to different modes of transport identified 111 487 individuals with the physical capacity to bicycle to work within 30 min but that currently drive a car to work.

RESULTS

Morbidity impacts and healthcare costs attributed to increased physical activity, change in air pollution exposure and accident risk are quantified under the scenario. The largest reduction in healthcare costs is attributed to increased physical activity and the second largest to reduced air pollution exposure among the population of Greater Stockholm. The expected net benefit from the investment is 8.7% of the 2017 Stockholm County healthcare budget, and 3.7% after discounting. The economic evaluation estimates that the intervention is cost-effective and each DALY averted gives a surplus of €9933. The results remained robust under varied assumptions pertaining to reduced numbers of additional bicycle commuters.

CONCLUSION

Investing in urban infrastructure to increase bicycling as active transport is cost-effective from a healthcare sector perspective.

摘要

目的

对斯德哥尔摩市自行车基础设施建设投资进行健康经济评估。

设计

从医疗保健角度进行成本效益分析。投资成本在 50 年的生命周期内被节省的医疗保健成本所抵消,并与发病率的长期估计影响(用残疾调整生命年衡量)进行比较。结果根据不同的假设进行重新计算,以模拟不确定性的影响。

背景

斯德哥尔摩市(人口 227 万)承诺投资自行车道基础设施,目标是到 2030 年自行车通勤者人数增加 15%。这项工作基于一个以前构建的方案,该方案使用个人登记的家庭和工作地址以及交通模型将不同的交通模式分配到不同的交通模式,确定了 111487 名有体力在 30 分钟内骑自行车上班但目前开车上班的人。

结果

在该方案下,量化了与增加身体活动、改变空气污染暴露和事故风险相关的发病率影响和医疗保健成本。医疗保健成本的最大降幅归因于体力活动的增加,其次是大斯德哥尔摩地区人口的空气污染暴露减少。投资的预期净收益为 2017 年斯德哥尔摩县医疗保健预算的 8.7%,贴现后为 3.7%。经济评估估计,该干预措施具有成本效益,每避免一个 DALY 可产生 9933 欧元的盈余。在涉及到减少额外自行车通勤者数量的各种假设下,结果仍然稳健。

结论

从医疗保健部门的角度来看,投资城市基础设施以增加自行车作为主动交通是具有成本效益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/6756337/c76dd2901dd6/bmjopen-2019-030466f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验