Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kırıkkale University School of Medicine, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kırıkkale Yuksek Ihtısas Hospital, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;276(12):3287-3293. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05635-x. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
The main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intratympanic administration of dexamethasone and resveratrol in preventing cisplatin ototoxicity by measuring acoustic brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE).
Forty rats (80 ears) were divided into five groups. Cisplatin was administered intraperitoneally to the first group (n = 8). Group 2 (n = 8) received cisplatin after resveratrol had been administered intratympanically. Group 3 (n = 8) received cisplatin after dexamethasone had been administered intratympanically. Group 4 (n = 8) received cisplatin after sodium chloride (NaCl) had been given intratympanically. Group 5 (n = 8) received cisplatin after dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) had been given intratympanically. ABR and DPOAE tests were performed on all groups before and 72 h after the procedure.
ABR threshold values in rats that received dexamethasone and resveratrol were found to be less affected than those observed in the other post-cisplatin groups. ABR-IV and ABR-I-IV interval values were significantly reduced in rats that had been given dexamethasone and resveratrol compared to the other groups. After cisplatin treatment, otoacoustic emission (OAE) amplitudes were significantly decreased in Groups 1, 4, and 5 for all frequencies, while OAE values were sustained in the resveratrol and dexamethasone groups (Groups 2 and 3). At OAE frequency 5652, dexamethasone was more significantly associated with protective than resveratrol was, while no significant difference was found between the two groups at other OAE frequencies.
In conclusion, intratympanic dexamethasone and intratympanic resveratrol treatments may provide a significant protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
本研究的主要目的是通过测量听性脑干反应(ABR)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)来比较鼓室内给予地塞米松和白藜芦醇预防顺铂耳毒性的疗效。
将 40 只大鼠(80 耳)分为五组。第一组(n=8)腹腔内给予顺铂。第二组(n=8)在给予白藜芦醇后给予顺铂。第三组(n=8)在给予地塞米松后给予顺铂。第四组(n=8)在给予鼓室内氯化钠(NaCl)后给予顺铂。第五组(n=8)在给予鼓室内二甲基亚砜(DMSO)后给予顺铂。所有组在给药前和给药后 72 小时进行 ABR 和 DPOAE 测试。
与其他顺铂组相比,接受地塞米松和白藜芦醇的大鼠的 ABR 阈值值受影响较小。与其他组相比,接受地塞米松和白藜芦醇的大鼠的 ABR-IV 和 ABR-I-IV 间隔值显著降低。在接受顺铂治疗后,各组大鼠的耳声发射(OAE)振幅均显著降低,而白藜芦醇和地塞米松组的 OAE 值保持不变。在 OAE 频率 5652 时,地塞米松对保护作用的相关性明显强于白藜芦醇,而在其他 OAE 频率时,两组之间没有发现显著差异。
总之,鼓室内地塞米松和鼓室内白藜芦醇治疗可能对顺铂诱导的耳毒性提供显著保护。