Suppr超能文献

黑种人“读眼神猜心思”任务:用于评估黑种人心理理论能力的一种新任务。

Black "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" task: The development of a task assessing mentalizing from black faces.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.

Department of Political Science & International Relations, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0221867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221867. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Researchers investigating various facets of theory of mind, sometimes referred to as mentalizing, are increasingly exploring how social group membership influences this process. To facilitate this research, we introduce the Black Reading the Mind in The Eyes task, a freely available 36-item Black RME task with an array of norming data about these stimuli. Stimuli have been created and equated to match the original Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) task which included only White faces. Norming data were collected in three waves that characterized the physical properties of the stimuli and also participants' subjective ratings of the stimuli. Between each round of ratings, stimuli that did not equate with the original RME task or were not distinctly recognized as Black were removed and new stimuli were incorporated in the next round until we obtained 36 distinctive Black RME targets that matched the 36 mental states used in the original RME stimulus set. Both stimulus sets were similarly difficult and subsequent testing showed that neither Black nor White participants' mentalizing accuracy varied as a function of target race. We provide instructions for obtaining the database and stimulus ratings.

摘要

研究人员正在调查心理理论的各个方面,有时也被称为心理化,他们越来越多地探索社会群体成员身份如何影响这一过程。为了促进这项研究,我们引入了“黑人阅读眼睛中的思维任务”(Black Reading the Mind in The Eyes task),这是一个免费的 36 项黑人 RME 任务,提供了有关这些刺激的各种标准化数据。刺激是根据原始的“阅读眼睛中的思维任务”(Reading the Mind in the Eyes task)创建和匹配的,该任务只包括白人面孔。标准化数据是在三个波次中收集的,这些波次描述了刺激的物理特性,以及参与者对刺激的主观评价。在每一轮评价之间,我们都会删除那些与原始 RME 任务不匹配或不能明显识别为黑人的刺激,然后在下一轮中加入新的刺激,直到我们获得 36 个独特的黑人 RME 目标,这些目标与原始 RME 刺激集中的 36 种心理状态相匹配。这两个刺激集都具有相似的难度,随后的测试表明,无论是黑人还是白人参与者的心理化准确性都不会因目标种族而有所不同。我们提供了获取数据库和刺激评价的说明。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The Human Face as a Dynamic Tool for Social Communication.人脸作为社会交流的动态工具。
Curr Biol. 2015 Jul 20;25(14):R621-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.052.
4
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.心理理论的细分:功能性脑成像研究的元分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:9-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
5
Racial bias in neural empathic responses to pain.对疼痛的神经共情反应中的种族偏见。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e84001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084001. eCollection 2013.
8
Dehumanization and infrahumanization.去人性化和次人类化。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:399-423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
10
Social judgments from faces.面孔所传递的社会判断。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验