Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房患者疼痛、躁动和谵妄的发生情况及处理措施

Occurrence and Practices for Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

作者信息

Arroyo-Novoa Carmen Mabel, Figueroa-Ramos Milagros I, Puntillo Kathleen A

机构信息

Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR.

Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

P R Health Sci J. 2019 Sep;38(3):156-162.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our study described the occurrence, assessment, prevention, and management practices of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in four intensive care units (ICUs) from the Puerto Rico Medical Center and compared findings with the 2013 PAD guidelines.

METHODS

A descriptive study, with repeated bedside measures (two times a day/two times a week) of PAD and review of patient clinical records.

RESULTS

Eighty ICU patients (20 per ICU) were evaluated, (median 3 times [IQR, 2-7]). At least once during the assessment period, 57% percent of patients had significant pain and 34% had delirium. Moreover, 46% were deeply sedated, 17.5% had agitation, and 52.5% of patients were within the recommended Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. The Numeric Rating Scale and RASS were the most common tools used by clinicians to evaluate pain and agitation/sedation levels, respectively. Clinicians did not assess pain in patients unable to self-report with any guideline-recommended tools, as was the case for delirium. Fentanyl and morphine were the most commonly used analgesics, while benzodiazepines were used for sedation.

CONCLUSION

Although pain, agitation, and delirium occurrence were similar to other studies, patients continue to suffer. A gap exists between clinical practices in these ICUs and current guidelines. Strategies that contribute to integrating guidelines into these ICUs should be developed, studied, and implemented.

摘要

目的

我们的研究描述了波多黎各医疗中心四个重症监护病房(ICU)中疼痛、躁动和谵妄(PAD)的发生情况、评估、预防及管理措施,并将研究结果与2013年PAD指南进行比较。

方法

一项描述性研究,对PAD进行重复的床边测量(每天两次/每周两次)并查阅患者临床记录。

结果

对80名ICU患者(每个ICU 20名)进行了评估(中位数为3次[四分位间距,2 - 7])。在评估期间,至少有一次,57%的患者有明显疼痛,34%的患者有谵妄。此外,46%的患者深度镇静,17.5%的患者有躁动,52.5%的患者的里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)评分在推荐范围内。数字评分量表和RASS分别是临床医生评估疼痛和躁动/镇静水平最常用的工具。临床医生未使用任何指南推荐的工具对无法自我报告的患者进行疼痛评估,谵妄评估情况亦是如此。芬太尼和吗啡是最常用的镇痛药,而苯二氮䓬类药物用于镇静。

结论

尽管疼痛、躁动和谵妄的发生率与其他研究相似,但患者仍在遭受痛苦。这些ICU的临床实践与当前指南之间存在差距。应制定、研究并实施有助于将指南纳入这些ICU的策略。

相似文献

8
Management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients.危重症患者疼痛、躁动及谵妄的管理
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124(3):114-23. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2136. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

6
Determinants of pain assessment documentation in intensive care units.重症监护病房疼痛评估记录的决定因素。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;68(8):1176-1184. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02022-1. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验