• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过德尔菲共识方法制定新生儿不良事件严重程度量表。

Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach.

机构信息

Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1167-1173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399
PMID:31537552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6943241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the seriousness, expectedness and causality are necessary for any adverse event (AE) in a clinical trial. In addition, assessing AE severity helps determine the importance of the AE in the clinical setting. Standardisation of AE severity criteria could make safety information more reliable and comparable across trials. Although standardised AE severity scales have been developed in other research fields, they are not suitable for use in neonates. The development of an AE severity scale to facilitate the conduct and interpretation of neonatal clinical trials is therefore urgently needed.

METHODS

A stepwise consensus process was undertaken within the International Neonatal Consortium (INC) with input from all relevant stakeholders. The consensus process included several rounds of surveys (based on a Delphi approach), face-to-face meetings and a pilot validation.

RESULTS

Neonatal AE severity was classified by five grades (mild, moderate, severe, life threatening or death). AE severity in neonates was defined by the effect of the AE on age appropriate behaviour, basal physiological functions and care changes in response to the AE. Pilot validation of the generic criteria revealed κ=0.23 and guided further refinement. This generic scale was applied to 35 typical and common neonatal AEs resulting in the INC neonatal AE severity scale (NAESS) V.1.0, which is now publicly available.

DISCUSSION

The INC NAESS is an ongoing effort that will be continuously updated. Future perspectives include further validation and the development of a training module for users.

摘要

背景

在临床试验中,任何不良事件(AE)都需要进行严重程度、预期性和因果关系的评估。此外,评估 AE 严重程度有助于确定 AE 在临床环境中的重要性。AE 严重程度标准的标准化可以使安全性信息在不同试验中更可靠和可比。尽管在其他研究领域已经开发出了标准化的 AE 严重程度量表,但它们并不适用于新生儿。因此,迫切需要开发一种 AE 严重程度量表,以方便新生儿临床试验的进行和解释。

方法

国际新生儿联盟(INC)内部采用逐步共识法,并征求了所有相关利益攸关方的意见。共识过程包括几轮调查(基于 Delphi 方法)、面对面会议和试点验证。

结果

新生儿 AE 严重程度分为五个等级(轻度、中度、重度、危及生命或死亡)。新生儿 AE 严重程度的定义是 AE 对年龄适当行为、基础生理功能和因 AE 而改变的护理的影响。对通用标准的试点验证显示 κ=0.23,并指导进一步细化。该通用量表应用于 35 种典型和常见的新生儿 AE,产生了 INC 新生儿 AE 严重程度量表(NAESS)V.1.0,现已公开。

讨论

INC NAESS 是一项正在进行的工作,将不断更新。未来的展望包括进一步验证和为用户开发培训模块。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/6943241/bea1eecc2c80/archdischild-2019-317399f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/6943241/5d813aa0b5b9/archdischild-2019-317399f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/6943241/bea1eecc2c80/archdischild-2019-317399f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/6943241/5d813aa0b5b9/archdischild-2019-317399f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58c2/6943241/bea1eecc2c80/archdischild-2019-317399f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach.通过德尔菲共识方法制定新生儿不良事件严重程度量表。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1167-1173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale.新生儿不良事件严重程度量表评分者间信度的前瞻性评估
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1237982. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237982. eCollection 2023.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Inter-rater reliability of the neonatal adverse event severity scale using real-world Neonatal clinical trial data.使用真实世界新生儿临床试验数据评估新生儿不良事件严重程度量表的评价者间信度。
J Perinatol. 2021 Dec;41(12):2813-2819. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01164-w. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
The neonatal adverse event severity scale: current status, a stakeholders' assessment, and future perspectives.新生儿不良事件严重程度量表:现状、利益相关者评估及未来展望。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 8;11:1340607. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1340607. eCollection 2023.
7
Delphi study for developing a checklist of adverse events associated with acupotomy.德尔菲研究制定针刀相关不良事件检查表。
J Integr Med. 2024 Sep;22(5):579-587. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Development of standard definitions and grading for Maternal and Fetal Adverse Event Terminology.制定孕产妇和胎儿不良事件术语的标准定义和分级。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jan;42(1):15-26. doi: 10.1002/pd.6047. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
9
Identifying a Core Domain Set to Assess Psoriasis in Clinical Trials.确定用于评估临床试验中银屑病的核心领域集。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1137-1144. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165.
10
Working towards consensus on methods used to elicit participant-reported safety data in uncomplicated malaria clinical drug studies: a Delphi technique study.致力于就单纯性疟疾临床药物研究中获取参与者报告的安全性数据所使用的方法达成共识:一项德尔菲技术研究。
Malar J. 2017 Jan 28;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1699-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of milrinone for prevention of post-patent ductus arteriosus closure syndrome (the MIDAS trial) in extremely preterm infants: a multicentre, double-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.评估米力农预防极早产儿动脉导管未闭综合征的疗效和安全性(MIDAS试验):一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 26;15(8):e105018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105018.
2
Acute High Dose Melatonin for Encephalopathy of the Newborn (ACUMEN) Study: a protocol for a multicentre phase 1 safety trial of melatonin to augment therapeutic hypothermia for moderate/severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.新生儿急性高剂量褪黑素治疗(ACUMEN)研究:一项关于褪黑素用于增强中度/重度缺氧缺血性脑病治疗性低温的多中心1期安全性试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e107083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107083.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A review of criteria strictness in "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials".《健康成年和青少年志愿者参与预防性疫苗临床试验的毒性分级标准》的严格性评价综述。
Vaccine. 2023 Aug 31;41(38):5622-5629. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.072. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Sharing Data to Accelerate Medicine Development and Improve Neonatal Care: Data Standards and Harmonized Definitions.共享数据以加速医学发展并改善新生儿护理:数据标准与统一定义
J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:437-441.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.082. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both.
Development of lactation and breast/chestfeeding adverse event terminology (LaBAET) through a Delphi consensus approach.通过德尔菲共识法制定泌乳及母乳喂养不良事件术语(LaBAET)。
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Jul 4;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00743-3.
4
Adverse events in the neonatal intensive care unit identified by triggers.通过触发因素识别新生儿重症监护病房中的不良事件。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 30;16:1539687. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1539687. eCollection 2025.
5
A Retrospective Analysis of PK and Response of Oral Ibuprofen in the Treatment of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.极低出生体重儿动脉导管未闭口服布洛芬治疗的药代动力学及反应回顾性分析
J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Sep;65(9):1157-1162. doi: 10.1002/jcph.70033. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
6
Clusters and associations of adverse neonatal events with adult risk of multimorbidity: A secondary analysis of birth cohort data.新生儿不良事件集群及关联与成人多种疾病风险:出生队列数据的二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319200. eCollection 2025.
7
A Pediatric Research Imperative: Addressing Neonates in Drug Development Through Understanding Neonatal Clinical Pharmacology.儿科研究的当务之急:通过理解新生儿临床药理学在药物研发中关注新生儿
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Feb;30(1):8-16. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-30.1.8. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
8
Safety reporting in neonatal clinical trials: reflections towards optimal, globally relevant approaches.新生儿临床试验中的安全性报告:对最佳的、具有全球相关性方法的思考
Trials. 2025 Feb 9;26(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08723-y.
9
Assessment of severity and avoidability of adverse drug reactions in neonates: a reproducibility study of the Hartwig tool and LAAT.新生儿药物不良反应的严重程度及可避免性评估:Hartwig工具和洛杉矶药物不良反应评估工具(LAAT)的再现性研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;81(1):123-127. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03765-8. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Recombinant fragment of human surfactant protein D to prevent neonatal chronic lung disease (RESPONSE): a protocol for a phase I safety trial in a tertiary neonatal unit.人表面活性蛋白 D 重组片段预防新生儿慢性肺疾病(RESPONSE):在三级新生儿病房进行 I 期安全性试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e086394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086394.
用于研究多种疗法、多种疾病或两者兼有的主方案。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):62-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510062.
4
Safety, dosing, and pharmaceutical quality for studies that evaluate medicinal products (including biological products) in neonates.评估新生儿药品(包括生物制品)的研究中的安全性、剂量和药品质量。
Pediatr Res. 2017 May;81(5):692-711. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.221. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
Development of a Pediatric Adverse Events Terminology.儿科不良事件术语的制定。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0985.
6
The International Neonatal Consortium: collaborating to advance regulatory science for neonates.国际新生儿联盟:携手推进新生儿监管科学。
Pediatr Res. 2016 Oct;80(4):462-4. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.119. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Spinal Adverse Events Severity System, version 2 (SAVES-V2): inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment.脊柱不良事件严重程度系统,第2版(SAVES-V2):观察者间和观察者内可靠性评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):256-63. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE14808. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: Guidelines From the American Heart Association and American Thoracic Society.儿童肺动脉高压:美国心脏协会和美国胸科学会指南。
Circulation. 2015 Nov 24;132(21):2037-99. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000329. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
10
Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012.1993 - 2012年极早产儿的护理实践、发病率及死亡率趋势
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244.