Hearse D J
Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 May;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00054247.
Understanding and controlling the consequences of myocardial ischemia requires us to acknowledge that we are dealing with a complex, dynamic, and highly variable process. The severity and progression of ischemic injury is not solely determined by the extent of oxygen deprivation, but by many other factors, including the accumulation of toxic metabolites. It may not be justified to assume that injury to the myocyte necessarily determines the survival of the organ; other components, such as the endothelium and the conducting system, may play a crucial role. Many factors can influence the severity and evolution of ischemic injury, perhaps the most important being the extent of residual (or collateral) flow to the affected tissue. If the ischemia is relatively mild, then the myocardium may survive for some long time, and drugs and other interventions may be used to further extend this period. However, reperfusion and the establishment of an adequate level of coronary flow is an absolute prerequisite for sustained tissue survival. The more severe the ischemia, the earlier must be the reperfusion. However, reperfusion of previously ischemic tissue is not without hazard, and it may precipitate potentially lethal events such as arrhythmias. Reperfusion may possibly result in the death of cells that were potentially viable in the moments before reflow was established, and there is good evidence that manipulation of reperfusion conditions may accelerate and possibly enhance recovery from ischemia. Much remains to be learned about myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, and in doing this we should perhaps put some of the older, yet well established, concepts behind us.
理解并控制心肌缺血的后果要求我们认识到,我们正在应对一个复杂、动态且高度可变的过程。缺血性损伤的严重程度和进展并非仅由缺氧程度决定,还受许多其他因素影响,包括有毒代谢产物的积累。假设心肌细胞损伤必然决定器官的存活可能并不合理;其他成分,如内皮和传导系统,可能起关键作用。许多因素可影响缺血性损伤的严重程度和演变,或许最重要的是受影响组织的残余(或侧支)血流程度。如果缺血相对较轻,那么心肌可能存活较长时间,可使用药物和其他干预措施进一步延长这一时期。然而,再灌注以及建立足够水平的冠状动脉血流是组织持续存活的绝对前提。缺血越严重,再灌注就必须越早进行。然而,对先前缺血组织的再灌注并非没有风险,它可能引发潜在致命事件,如心律失常。再灌注可能导致在血流恢复前本可能存活的细胞死亡,而且有充分证据表明,控制再灌注条件可能加速并可能增强从缺血中的恢复。关于心肌缺血和再灌注仍有许多有待了解之处,在研究过程中,我们或许应该摒弃一些陈旧但已确立的观念。