• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Utility of a chemotherapy toxicity prediction tool for older patients in a community setting.社区环境中老年患者化疗毒性预测工具的实用性。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):234-239. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4869. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults: Comparing the predictive value of the CARG Toxicity Score with oncologists' estimates of toxicity based on clinical judgement.预测老年人化疗毒性:比较 CARG 毒性评分与肿瘤学家基于临床判断估计毒性的预测价值。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
Oncologists' perceptions on the usefulness of geriatric assessment measures and the CARG toxicity score when prescribing chemotherapy for older patients with cancer.肿瘤学家对老年癌症患者化疗时使用老年综合评估和 CARG 毒性评分的看法。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
The predictive value of G8 and the Cancer and aging research group chemotherapy toxicity tool in treatment-related toxicity in older Chinese patients with cancer.G8及癌症与衰老研究组化疗毒性工具对中国老年癌症患者治疗相关毒性的预测价值。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 May;12(4):557-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
A comparison of the CARG tool, the VES-13, and oncologist judgment in predicting grade 3+ toxicities in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.在预测接受化疗的转移性前列腺癌男性患者发生3级及以上毒性反应方面,对CARG工具、VES-13和肿瘤学家的判断进行比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Jan;8(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Assessing the ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group tool to predict chemotherapy toxicity in older Japanese patients: A prospective observational study.评估癌症和衰老研究组工具预测老年日本患者化疗毒性的能力:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jul;15(6):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101814. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
The performance of three oncogeriatric screening tools - G8, optimised G8 and CARG - in predicting chemotherapy-related toxicity in older patients with cancer. A prospective clinical study.三种肿瘤老年综合评估工具(G8、优化 G8 和 CARG)在预测老年癌症患者化疗相关毒性中的性能。一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov;10(6):937-943. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 10.
8
Prospective comparison of the value of CARG, G8, and VES-13 toxicity tools in predicting chemotherapy-related toxicity in older Turkish patients with cancer.前瞻性比较 CARG、G8 和 VES-13 毒性工具在预测土耳其老年癌症患者化疗相关毒性中的价值。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):821-827. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
The Effect of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic on Treatment Decisions in Mexican Older Adults With Cancer.老年肿瘤诊所对墨西哥老年癌症患者治疗决策的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):992-997. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15753. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) score in older adults undergoing curative intent chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.老年癌症患者接受根治性化疗时的癌症与衰老研究组(CARG)评分:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047376.

引用本文的文献

1
Geriatric Assessment Tools in Head and Neck Radiation Oncology: An Unmet Need.头颈部放射肿瘤学中的老年评估工具:一项未被满足的需求。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 3;17(3):e79979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79979. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Predictive ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity calculator in hematologic malignancy.癌症与衰老研究组化疗毒性计算器在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的预测能力。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2025 Jan;16(1):102144. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102144. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
3
Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how.老年综合评估:临床医生的为何、何为及如何做。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Nov-Dec;74(6):496-518. doi: 10.3322/caac.21864. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Adjuvant Treatment of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Offer the Best Chances of Cure.老年乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗:提供最佳治愈机会。
Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Feb;17(1):71-80. doi: 10.1159/000513708. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
The Evolution of Geriatric Oncology and Geriatric Assessment over the Past Decade.过去十年老年肿瘤学和老年综合评估的发展。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr;32(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.002.
6
Geriatric assessment in older adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology (YSIOG) review paper.老年非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的老年评估:老年肿瘤国际协作组(YSIOG)的一篇综述论文。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(5):572-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
7
Management of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Older Adults: Balancing Risks and Benefits of Novel Therapies.老年转移性结直肠癌的管理:平衡新型疗法的风险和获益。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Aug;38(8):639-654. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00869-z. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
8
Beyond Performance Status.超越功能状态评估。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Sep;32(9):553-561. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a geriatric oncology assessment to link with services (GOAL).采用老年肿瘤评估以链接相关服务(GOAL)。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jan;10(1):164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.老年化疗患者脆弱性的实用评估和管理:ASCO 老年肿瘤学指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2326-2347. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8687. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Predicting cumulative incidence of adverse events in older patients with cancer undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy: Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) multicentre prospective study.预测行一线姑息化疗的老年癌症患者不良事件累积发生率:韩国癌症研究组(KCSG)多中心前瞻性研究。
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(9):1169-1175. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0037-6. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
A comparison of the CARG tool, the VES-13, and oncologist judgment in predicting grade 3+ toxicities in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.在预测接受化疗的转移性前列腺癌男性患者发生3级及以上毒性反应方面,对CARG工具、VES-13和肿瘤学家的判断进行比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Jan;8(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
5
Geriatric assessment with management in cancer care: Current evidence and potential mechanisms for future research.老年综合评估与癌症管理:当前的证据和未来研究的潜在机制。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jul;7(4):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Comparing attitudes of younger and older patients towards cancer clinical trials.比较年轻患者和老年患者对癌症临床试验的态度。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 May;7(3):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Assessing agreement with multiple raters on correlated kappa statistics.评估多个评分者在相关kappa统计量上的一致性。
Biom J. 2016 Jul;58(4):935-43. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500029. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Geriatric Assessment-Guided Care Processes for Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus of Geriatric Oncology Experts.老年评估指导的老年人护理流程:老年肿瘤学专家的德尔菲共识
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Sep;13(9):1120-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0137.
9
Estimating the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients with cancer: The role of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13).评估老年癌症患者化疗毒性风险:脆弱老年人调查-13(VES-13)的作用。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2015 Jul;6(4):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
10
The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment interventions on tolerance to chemotherapy in older people.综合老年评估干预措施对老年人化疗耐受性的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1435-44. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.120. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

社区环境中老年患者化疗毒性预测工具的实用性。

Utility of a chemotherapy toxicity prediction tool for older patients in a community setting.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Medical Oncology, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):234-239. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4869. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.26.4869
PMID:31548802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6726281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expert groups have recommended incorporation of a geriatric assessment into clinical practice for older patients starting oncologic therapy. However, that practice is not standard primarily because of resource limitations. In the present study, we evaluated the effect on treatment decisions by oncologists in the community oncology setting of a brief geriatric assessment tool that estimates risk of toxicity.

METHODS

This prospective longitudinal study in 5 community oncology practices in British Columbia involved patients 70 years of age and older starting a new cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen. Clinical personnel completed a brief validated geriatric assessment tool-the Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity tool (carg-tt)-that estimates the risk of grade 3 or greater toxicity in older patients. Physicians were asked if the carg-tt changed their treatment plan or prompted extra supports. Patients were followed to assess the incidence of toxicity during treatment.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 199 patients between July 2016 and February 2018. Mean age was 77 years. Treatment was palliative in 61.4% of the group. Compared with physician judgment, the carg-tt predicted higher rates of toxicity. In 5 patients, treatment was changed based on the carg-tt. In 38.5% of the patients, data from the tool prompted extra supports. Within the first 3 cycles of treatment, 21.3% of patients had experienced grade 3 or greater toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that use of a brief geriatric assessment tool is possible in a broad community oncology practice. The tool modified the oncologist's supportive care plan for a significant number of older patients undertaking cytotoxic chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

专家组建议将老年评估纳入开始肿瘤治疗的老年患者的临床实践中。然而,由于资源限制,这种做法并未成为标准。在本研究中,我们评估了在社区肿瘤学环境中使用一种简短的老年评估工具来评估毒性风险对肿瘤学家治疗决策的影响。

方法

这项在不列颠哥伦比亚省 5 家社区肿瘤学实践中的前瞻性纵向研究涉及 70 岁及以上开始新细胞毒性化疗方案的患者。临床人员完成了一个简短的经过验证的老年评估工具——癌症和老龄化研究组化疗毒性工具(carg-tt),该工具估计老年患者发生 3 级或更高级别毒性的风险。医生被问及 carg-tt 是否改变了他们的治疗计划或需要额外的支持。对患者进行随访以评估治疗期间的毒性发生率。

结果

该研究于 2016 年 7 月至 2018 年 2 月期间纳入了 199 名患者。平均年龄为 77 岁。该组中 61.4%的患者接受姑息治疗。与医生的判断相比,carg-tt 预测了更高的毒性发生率。在 5 名患者中,根据 carg-tt 改变了治疗方案。在 38.5%的患者中,工具数据提示需要额外的支持。在治疗的前 3 个周期内,21.3%的患者出现了 3 级或更高级别的毒性。

结论

本研究表明,在广泛的社区肿瘤学实践中使用简短的老年评估工具是可行的。该工具改变了相当数量接受细胞毒性化疗的老年患者的肿瘤学家支持性护理计划。