Rey Lopez Juan Pablo, Gebel Klaus, Chia Debbie, Stamatakis Emmanuel
Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Aug 12;5(1):e000596. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000596. eCollection 2019.
Physical activity recommendations state that for the same energy expenditure, moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPAs) produce similar health benefits. However, few epidemiological studies have tested this hypothesis.
We examined whether, compared with moderate, vigorous activity was associated with larger mortality risk reductions.
Data from 11 cohorts of the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey, collected from 1994 to 2011 (mean (SD) follow-up, 9.0 (3.6) years). Adults aged ≥30 years reported MVPA and linkage to mortality records. Exposure was the proportion of self-reported weighted MVPA through vigorous activity. Outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality.
Among 64 913 adult respondents (44% men, 56% women, mean (SD) age, 49.8 (13.6) years), there were 5064 deaths from all-causes, 1393 from CVD and 1602 from cancer during 435 743 person-years of follow-up. Compared with those who reported no vigorous physical activity, and holding constant the volume of weighted MVPA, vigorous activity was associated with additional reductions in mortality risk. For all-cause mortality, the adjusted HR was HR=0.84 (95% CI 0.71, 0.99) and HR=0.84 (95% CI 0.76, 0.94) among those who reported between >0% and<30%, or ≥30% of their activity as vigorous, respectively. For CVD and cancer mortality, point estimates showed similar beneficial associations yet CIs were wider and crossed unity.
Vigorous activities were associated with larger reductions in mortality risk than activities of moderate intensity, but no evidence of dose-response effects was found.
体力活动建议指出,在相同能量消耗的情况下,中度至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)产生的健康益处相似。然而,很少有流行病学研究验证这一假设。
我们研究了与中度活动相比,剧烈活动是否与更大程度的死亡风险降低相关。
数据来自1994年至2011年收集的11个队列的英格兰健康调查和苏格兰健康调查(平均(标准差)随访时间为9.0(3.6)年)。年龄≥30岁的成年人报告了MVPA情况并与死亡率记录相联系。暴露因素是通过剧烈活动自我报告的加权MVPA比例。结局指标是全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率和癌症死亡率。
在64913名成年受访者中(44%为男性,56%为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为49.8(13.6)岁),在435743人年的随访期间,共有5064例全因死亡、1393例CVD死亡和1602例癌症死亡。与那些报告没有剧烈体力活动的人相比,在加权MVPA量保持不变的情况下,剧烈活动与死亡风险的额外降低相关。对于全因死亡率,在那些报告其活动中有>0%且<30%,或≥30%为剧烈活动的人群中,调整后的HR分别为HR = 0.84(95%CI 0.71,0.99)和HR = 0.84(95%CI 0.76,0.94)。对于CVD和癌症死亡率,点估计显示出类似的有益关联,但可信区间更宽且包含1。
与中等强度活动相比,剧烈活动与更大程度的死亡风险降低相关,但未发现剂量反应效应的证据。