Shiroma Eric J, Sesso Howard D, Moorthy M V, Buring Julie E, Lee I-Min
Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.J.S., H.D.S., M., J.E.B., I.M.L.).
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Oct 17;3(5):e000802. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000802.
Limited data exist directly comparing the relative benefits of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities with all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) disease mortality rates when controlling for physical activity volume.
We followed 7979 men (Harvard Alumni Health Study, 1988-2008) and 38 671 women (Women's Health Study, 1992-2012), assessing their physical activity and health habits through repeated questionnaires. Over a mean follow-up of 17.3 years in men and 16.4 years in women, there were 3551 deaths (1077 from CV disease) among men and 3170 deaths (620 from CV disease) among women. Those who met or exceeded an equivalent of the federal guidelines recommendation of at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity, 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity, or a combination of the 2 that expended similar energy experienced significantly lower all-cause and CV disease-related mortality rates (men, 28% to 36% and 31% to 34%, respectively; women: 38% to 55% and 22% to 44%, respectively). When comparing different combinations of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity and all-cause mortality rates, we observed sex-related differences. Holding constant the volume of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity, men experienced a modest additional benefit when expending a greater proportion of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity in vigorous-intensity activities (Ptrend=0.04), but women did not (Ptrend<0.001). Moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity composition was not associated with further cardiovascular mortality rate reductions in either men or women.
The present data support guidelines recommending 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week, 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week, or an equivalent combination for mortality benefits. Among men, but not women, additional modest reductions in all-cause mortality rates are associated with a greater proportion of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity performed at a vigorous intensity.
在控制体力活动总量的情况下,直接比较中等强度和高强度活动对全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CV)死亡率的相对益处的数据有限。
我们对7979名男性(哈佛校友健康研究,1988 - 2008年)和38671名女性(女性健康研究,1992 - 2012年)进行了随访,通过重复问卷调查评估他们的体力活动和健康习惯。男性平均随访17.3年,女性平均随访16.4年,男性中有3551人死亡(1077人死于心血管疾病),女性中有3170人死亡(620人死于心血管疾病)。那些达到或超过相当于联邦指南建议的每周至少150分钟中等强度活动、75分钟高强度活动或两者消耗相似能量的组合的人,全因死亡率和心血管疾病相关死亡率显著降低(男性分别降低28%至36%和31%至34%;女性分别降低38%至55%和22%至44%)。在比较中等强度和高强度活动的不同组合与全因死亡率时,我们观察到了性别差异。在中等至高强度体力活动量保持不变的情况下,男性在高强度活动中消耗更大比例的中等至高强度体力活动时会有适度的额外益处(P趋势 = 0.04),但女性没有(P趋势<0.001)。中等至高强度体力活动的组成与男性或女性进一步降低心血管死亡率无关。
目前的数据支持指南建议,即每周进行150分钟中等强度活动、75分钟高强度活动或同等组合以获得死亡率益处。在男性中,但在女性中并非如此,全因死亡率的适度额外降低与以高强度进行的更大比例的中等至高强度体力活动有关。