Suppr超能文献

欧盟和美国生物燃料政策中基于废物的生物燃料温室气体影响量化的挑战:以城市固体废物生产丁醇和乙醇为例。

Challenges in Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Waste-Based Biofuels in EU and US Biofuel Policies: Case Study of Butanol and Ethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste.

机构信息

Sustainable Process Technologies Group, Faculty of Engineering , University of Nottingham , Nottingham NG7 2RD , U.K.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 15;53(20):12141-12149. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04286. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

Abstract

Conversion of wastes to biofuels is a promising route to provide renewable low-carbon fuels, based on a low- or negative-cost feedstock, whose use can avoid negative environmental impacts of conventional waste treatment. However, current policies that employ LCA as a quantitative measure are not adequate for assessing this type of fuel, given their cross-sector interactions and multiple potential product/service streams (energy, fuels, materials, waste treatment service). We employ a case study of butanol and ethanol production from mixed municipal solid waste to demonstrate the challenges in using life cycle assessment to appropriately inform decision-makers. Greenhouse gas emissions results vary from -566 gCO eq/MJ (under US policies that employ system expansion approach) to +86 gCO eq/MJ and +23 gCO eq/MJ (under initial and current EU policies that employ energy-based allocation), relative to gasoline emissions of +94 gCO eq. LCA methods used in existing policies thus provide contradictory information to decision-makers regarding the potential for waste-based biofuels. A key factor differentiating life cycle assessment methodologies is the inclusion of avoided impacts of conventional waste treatment in US policies and their exclusion in EU policies. Present EU rules risk discouraging the valorisation of wastes to biofuels thus forcing waste toward lower-value treatment processes and products.

摘要

将废物转化为生物燃料是提供可再生低碳燃料的有前途的途径,其基于低成本或负成本的原料,使用这种原料可以避免传统废物处理的负面环境影响。然而,由于交叉部门的相互作用和多种潜在的产品/服务流(能源、燃料、材料、废物处理服务),目前采用生命周期评估作为定量衡量标准的政策并不足以评估此类燃料。我们采用了从混合城市固体废物中生产丁醇和乙醇的案例研究,以展示在使用生命周期评估为决策者提供适当信息方面所面临的挑战。与汽油排放的 +94 gCO eq 相比,温室气体排放结果从 -566 gCO eq/MJ(在美国采用系统扩展方法的政策下)变化到 +86 gCO eq/MJ 和 +23 gCO eq/MJ(在欧盟采用基于能源的分配的初始和现行政策下)。因此,现有政策中使用的生命周期评估方法为决策者提供了关于基于废物的生物燃料的潜在可能性的相互矛盾的信息。区分生命周期评估方法的一个关键因素是美国政策中包括了避免传统废物处理的影响,而欧盟政策则排除了这些影响。目前的欧盟规则有风险阻碍废物向生物燃料的增值,从而迫使废物采用低价值的处理工艺和产品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验