College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:388-399. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
The COVID-19 pandemic attracts concerns globally and leads to an exponential increase in medical waste generation, and disposal of medical waste is an urgent need for preventing the epidemic spread. Emergency disposal scenarios of medical waste generated during the COVID-19 pandemic require a systematic assessment to quantify their potential environmental impacts. The environmental impacts and key factors of three movable disposal scenarios (i.e. incineration disposal vehicle, movable steam and microwave sterilization equipment both followed by co-incineration with municipal solid waste) were quantified via life cycle assessment approach. Furthermore, the environmental impacts of three movable disposal and two co-incineration scenarios were compared via life cycle assessment by expanding system boundaries. The results show that co-incineration with municipal solid waste has the lowest environmental impacts due to environmental benefits produced by power generation, while co-incineration with hazardous waste is the highest due to the high energy consumption. Energy consumption (i.e. kerosene, electricity and diesel) are the key factors for three movable disposal scenarios. For movable steam and microwave sterilization equipment followed by co-incineration with municipal solid waste, power generation from incinerating disinfected medical waste has significant beneficial environmental impacts due to avoided impacts of electricity consumption. The recommendations for improvement of the emergency disposal and management of medical waste during the COVID-19 pandemic globally and other serious epidemic in the future are provided.
新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情(COVID-19)在全球范围内引发关注,导致医疗废物产生量呈指数级增长,因此医疗废物的处置成为防控疫情传播的当务之急。需要对疫情期间产生的医疗废物的应急处置方案进行系统评估,以量化其潜在的环境影响。本研究采用生命周期评价方法对三种可移动处置方案(即焚烧处置车、可移动蒸汽和微波消毒设备,随后均与城市固体废物共焚烧)的环境影响和关键因素进行了量化。此外,还通过扩展系统边界,对三种可移动处置方案和两种共焚烧方案的环境影响进行了生命周期评价比较。结果表明,由于发电带来的环境效益,与城市固体废物共焚烧的环境影响最低,而由于高能耗,与危险废物共焚烧的环境影响最高。能源消耗(即煤油、电和柴油)是三种可移动处置方案的关键因素。对于可移动蒸汽和微波消毒设备随后与城市固体废物共焚烧的方案,由于避免了电力消耗的影响,焚烧消毒医疗废物产生的电力具有显著的有益环境影响。本研究提出了针对全球范围内 COVID-19 疫情和未来其他严重疫情期间医疗废物应急处置和管理的改进建议。