Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2019 Oct;39(7):886-893. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19874347. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
. There is a growing need for valid shared decision-making (SDM) measures. We aimed to determine whether the items of extant SDM observer-based coding schemes assess the 4 key elements of SDM. . Items of SDM coding schemes were extracted and categorized. Except for the 4 key elements of SDM (fostering choice awareness, informing about options, discussing patient preferences, and making a decision), (sub)categories were created inductively. Two researchers categorized items independently and in duplicate. . Five of 12 coding schemes assessed all 4 SDM elements. Seven schemes did not measure "fostering choice awareness," and 3 did not measure "discussing patient preferences." Seventy of 194 items (36%) could not be classified into one of the key SDM elements. Items assessing key SDM elements most often assessed "informing about options" ( = 57/124, 46%). . Extant SDM coding schemes often do not assess all key SDM elements and have a strong focus on information provision while other crucial elements of SDM are underrepresented. Caution is therefore needed in reporting and interpreting the resulting SDM scores.
目前对于有效的共享决策(SDM)评估工具的需求日益增长。本研究旨在确定现有的基于观察者的 SDM 编码方案的项目是否评估了 SDM 的 4 个关键要素。从 SDM 编码方案中提取并分类项目。除了 SDM 的 4 个关键要素(增强选择意识、提供信息、讨论患者偏好和做出决策)外,还采用归纳法创建了(子)类别。两名研究人员独立且重复地对项目进行分类。在 12 个编码方案中有 5 个评估了所有 4 个 SDM 要素,7 个方案未测量“增强选择意识”,3 个方案未测量“讨论患者偏好”。194 个项目中的 70 个(36%)无法归入关键 SDM 要素之一。评估关键 SDM 要素的项目最常评估“提供信息”(=57/124,46%)。现有的 SDM 编码方案通常未评估所有关键 SDM 要素,而对信息提供的重视程度较强,而 SDM 的其他关键要素则被低估。因此,在报告和解释由此产生的 SDM 得分时需要谨慎。