Suppr超能文献

低至中危口咽癌患者行一期经口机器人手术联合颈部清扫与非手术治疗后的吞咽困难情况

Dysphagia After Primary Transoral Robotic Surgery With Neck Dissection vs Nonsurgical Therapy in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Risk Oropharyngeal Cancer.

作者信息

Hutcheson Katherine A, Warneke Carla L, Yao Christopher M K L, Zaveri Jhankruti, Elgohari Baher E, Goepfert Ryan, Hessel Amy C, Kupferman Michael E, Lai Stephen Y, Fuller C David, Gunn G Brandon, Garden Adam S, Johnson Faye, Ferrarotto Renata, Lewin Jan S, Gross Neil D

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov 1;145(11):1053-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2725.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A major goal of primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer is to optimize swallowing outcomes by personalized treatment based on pathologic staging. However, swallowing outcomes after TORS are uncertain, as are the outcomes compared with nonsurgical options.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate rates of acute dysphagia and recovery after TORS and to compare swallowing outcomes by primary treatment modality (TORS or radiotherapy).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This case series study was a secondary analysis of prospective registry data from 257 patients enrolled from March 1, 2015, to February 28, 2018, at a single academic institution who, according to the AJCC Staging Manual, 7th edition TNM classification, had low- to intermediate-risk human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma possibly resectable by TORS.

EXPOSURE

Patients were stratified by primary treatment (75 underwent TORS and 182 received radiotherapy).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Modified barium swallow (MBS) studies graded per Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN) questionnaires were administered at standard intervals. Prevalence and severity of dysphagia were estimated per DIGEST before and after TORS and 3 to 6 months after treatment. Moderate-severe dysphagia (DIGEST grade ≥2) was assessed using logistic regression and compared by primary treatment group. The MDASI swallowing symptom severity item scores during and after radiotherapy were compared using generalized estimating equations by treatment status at the start of radiotherapy, after induction, and after TORS.

RESULTS

A total of 257 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.54 [9.07] years; 222 [86.4%] male) were included in the study. Dysphagia severity (per DIGEST) was significantly worse after TORS (r = -0.63; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.44): 17 patients (22.7%; 95% CI, 13.8%-33.8%) had moderate-severe (DIGEST grade ≥2) acute post-TORS dysphagia significantly associated with primary tumor volume (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.11-1.84). DIGEST improved by 3 to 6 months but remained worse than that at baseline; at 3 to 6 months, the number of patients with DIGEST grade 2 or higher dysphagia was 5 (6.7%; 95% CI, 2.2%-14.9%) after primary TORS and 29 (15.9%; 95% CI, 10.9%-22.1%) after radiotherapy. At the start of radiotherapy, MDASI swallowing symptom severity item scores were significantly worse in the post-TORS group compared with postinduction (mean [SD] change, 2.6 [1.1]) and treatment-naive (mean [SD] change, 1.7 [0.3]) patients. This result inverted at radiotherapy end, and all groups converged at 3 to 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Subacute swallowing outcomes were similar regardless of primary treatment modality among patients with low- to intermediate-risk oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

摘要

重要性

口咽癌一期经口机器人手术(TORS)的一个主要目标是通过基于病理分期的个性化治疗来优化吞咽结果。然而,TORS后的吞咽结果尚不确定,与非手术治疗方案相比的结果也是如此。

目的

评估TORS后急性吞咽困难的发生率和恢复情况,并比较主要治疗方式(TORS或放疗)的吞咽结果。

设计、地点和参与者:本病例系列研究是对2015年3月1日至2018年2月28日在一家学术机构登记的257例患者的前瞻性登记数据进行的二次分析。根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版TNM分类,这些患者患有低至中度风险的人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞状细胞癌,可能可通过TORS切除。

暴露因素

患者按主要治疗方式分层(75例行TORS,182例接受放疗)。

主要结局和测量指标

采用吞咽毒性动态成像分级(DIGEST)对改良钡餐吞咽(MBS)研究进行分级,并在标准间隔时间内发放MD安德森症状问卷-头颈模块(MDASI-HN)。在TORS前后以及治疗后3至6个月,根据DIGEST评估吞咽困难的患病率和严重程度。使用逻辑回归评估中重度吞咽困难(DIGEST分级≥2),并按主要治疗组进行比较。放疗期间及放疗后的MDASI吞咽症状严重程度项目得分,通过广义估计方程,根据放疗开始时、诱导后和TORS后的治疗状态进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入257例患者(平均[标准差]年龄为59.54[9.07]岁;222例[86.4%]为男性)。TORS后吞咽困难严重程度(根据DIGEST)明显更差(r=-0.63;95%置信区间,-0.78至-0.44):17例患者(22.7%;95%置信区间,13.8%-33.8%)在TORS后出现中重度(DIGEST分级≥2)急性吞咽困难,与原发肿瘤体积显著相关(比值比,1.43;95%置信区间,1.11-1.84)。DIGEST在3至6个月时有所改善,但仍比基线时差;在3至6个月时,TORS后DIGEST分级为2级或更高吞咽困难的患者有5例(6.7%;95%置信区间,2.2%-14.9%),放疗后有29例(15.9%;95%置信区间,10.9%-22.1%)。在放疗开始时,与诱导后(平均[标准差]变化,2.6[1.1])和未接受治疗(平均[标准差]变化,1.7[0.3])的患者相比,TORS后组的MDASI吞咽症状严重程度项目得分明显更差。这一结果在放疗结束时反转,所有组在3至6个月时趋于一致。

结论及相关性

低至中度风险口咽鳞状细胞癌患者,无论主要治疗方式如何,亚急性吞咽结果相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验