• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体基台螺钉螺纹通道角度对其抗旋扭矩值的影响。

Effect of Screw Channel Angulation on Reverse Torque Values of Dental Implant Abutment Screws.

机构信息

Naval Postgraduate Dental School - Prosthodontics, Bethesda, MD.

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;28(9):969-972. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13111. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.13111
PMID:31560132
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the reverse torque values (RTVs) of abutment screws tightened from three different angles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Implant abutment screws (n = 48), abutments (3), and regular platform implant analogs (3) were divided into three angulation groups (n = 16/group). Custom guides of 0°, 10°, and 20° were fabricated to verify driver angulation. The implant components for each group were assembled and all screws torqued to 35 Ncm using a universal screwdriver in a manual torque wrench at the appropriate angle. Torque was reapplied 10 minutes after initial torque. A digital gauge was then used to measure reverse torque at a position parallel (0°) to the implant analog. RTVs were recorded and compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

All mean RTVs fell below the targeted torque value of 35Ncm, with some values in each angulation group 10% below of the target value. Mean RTVs in descending order from targeted torque value were: 10° group = 32.07 ± 0.97 Ncm, 0° group = 31.16 ± 1.12 Ncm, and 20° group = 30.08 ± 0.88 Ncm. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between angulation groups (F = 15.954, p < 0.001). Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons revealed that the mean RTVs of the three angulation groups were significantly different from each other (0° vs. 10°: p = 0.033; 0° vs. 20°: p = 0.011; 10° vs. 20°: p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All RTVs did not reach the targeted torque value of 35 Ncm. Mean screw RTVs were significantly influenced by screwdriver insertion angulation.

摘要

目的

比较从三个不同角度拧紧基台螺丝的反向扭矩值(RTV)。

材料与方法

将种植体基台螺丝(n=48)、基台(3 个)和常规平台种植体模拟体(3 个)分为三组不同的角度(n=16/组)。制作 0°、10°和 20°的定制引导器以验证螺丝刀的角度。将每组的种植体组件组装好,然后在适当角度的手动扭矩扳手中使用通用螺丝刀将所有螺丝拧紧至 35 Ncm。初始扭矩 10 分钟后再次施加扭矩。然后使用数字卡尺在与种植体模拟体平行(0°)的位置测量反向扭矩。记录并比较 RTV 值,使用单因素方差分析和 Tukey HSD 事后比较(α=0.05)。

结果

所有平均 RTV 值均低于 35 Ncm 的目标扭矩值,每个角度组的一些值比目标值低 10%。按目标扭矩值降序排列的平均 RTV 值分别为:10°组=32.07±0.97 Ncm、0°组=31.16±1.12 Ncm 和 20°组=30.08±0.88 Ncm。单因素方差分析显示角度组之间存在显著差异(F=15.954,p<0.001)。Tukey HSD 事后比较显示,三组角度的平均 RTV 值彼此之间有显著差异(0°与 10°:p=0.033;0°与 20°:p=0.011;10°与 20°:p<0.001)。

结论

所有 RTV 值均未达到 35 Ncm 的目标扭矩值。螺丝的平均 RTV 值受螺丝刀插入角度的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of Screw Channel Angulation on Reverse Torque Values of Dental Implant Abutment Screws.种植体基台螺钉螺纹通道角度对其抗旋扭矩值的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;28(9):969-972. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13111. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
2
Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.CAD-CAM 钛和氧化锆基台在不同种植体上的螺钉稳定性:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/cid.13001. Epub 2021 May 2.
3
Removal torque and force to failure of non-axially tightened implant abutment screws.非轴向紧固种植体基台螺钉的去除扭矩和断裂力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Effect of fluid contamination on the reverse torque values of abutment screws at implant-abutment connections.流体污染对种植体-基台连接中基台螺丝抗扭值的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):618-621. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
The effect of abutment screw length on screw loosening in dental implants with external abutment connections after thermocycling.热循环后外基台连接的牙科种植体中基台螺丝长度对螺丝松动的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):59-62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3125.
6
Effect of cyclic loading on reverse torque values of angled screw channel systems.循环加载对角度螺钉通道系统反向扭矩值的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):458-466. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging.不同基台角度的螺钉固位种植体支持的前牙固定修复体老化后的扭矩维持。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):723-729. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8647.
8
In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.体外评估螺丝固位和粘结固位种植体固定修复体基台螺丝的反向扭矩值和边缘间隙。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1061-7.
9
Abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants: An in vitro study.角度矫正种植体中基台螺丝松动:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
10
Effects of cyclic loading on loss of abutment screw torque of angled screw channel single implant crowns on narrow diameter implants.循环加载对窄直径种植体上带角度螺丝通道的单颗种植体牙冠基台螺丝扭矩丧失的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):741.e1-741.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Aesthetic, Mechanical Outcome, and Bone Loss in Angulated Screw Channels (ASCs) and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Case-Control Study.成角螺钉通道(ASC)与骨水泥固位种植体支持式修复体的美学、力学结果及骨吸收比较:一项病例对照研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):233. doi: 10.3390/dj12080233.
2
The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.角度式牙种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症及性能:一篇叙述性综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Influence of screw channel angulation on reverse torque value and fracture resistance in monolithic zirconia restorations after thermomechanical cycling: an in-vitro study.
热机械循环后单块氧化锆修复体中螺旋通道角度对逆向扭矩值和抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04171-3.
4
Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An- study.角度螺钉通道基台与多单位基台固位单单位种植体修复体在前牙美学区的生物学、机械学和患者报告结局的比较评价:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):244-252. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_101_23.
5
Reverse Torque Value of Angulated Screw Channel Abutment before and after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Study.角度螺丝通道基台在循环加载前后的反向扭矩值:一项体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Feb 24;14(3):124. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030124.
6
The effect of the digital manufacturing technique of cantilevered implant-supported frameworks on abutment screw preload.悬臂式种植体支持框架的数字化制造技术对基台螺钉预紧力的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;14(1):22-31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.22. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
7
Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes of Angled Screw Channel Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review.角形螺钉通道种植体修复体的临床和实验室结果:一项系统评价
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):488-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740298. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
8
The Application of Angulated Screw-Channels in Metal-Free, Implant-Supported Restorations: A Retrospective Survival Analysis.成角螺丝通道在无金属、种植体支持修复中的应用:一项回顾性生存分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;14(22):7006. doi: 10.3390/ma14227006.
9
Titanium Base Abutments in Implant Prosthodontics: A Literature Review.种植修复学中的钛基台:文献综述
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735423. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Aesthetic Outcomes and Peri-Implant Health of Angled Screw Retained Implant Restorations Compared with Cement Retained Crowns: Medium Term Follow-Up.角度螺丝固位种植体修复与粘结固位冠的美学效果及种植体周围健康状况:中期随访
J Funct Biomater. 2021 May 16;12(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jfb12020035.