• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水汽压亏缺对野生型和脱落酸不敏感植物气体交换的影响。

Effect of Vapor Pressure Deficit on Gas Exchange in Wild-Type and Abscisic Acid-Insensitive Plants.

机构信息

College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4879, Australia

Ecosystem Fluxes and Stable Isotope Research Group, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Plant Physiol. 2019 Dec;181(4):1573-1586. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00436. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1104/pp.19.00436
PMID:31562233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6878010/
Abstract

Stomata control the gas exchange of terrestrial plant leaves, and are therefore essential to plant growth and survival. We investigated gas exchange responses to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in two gray poplar () lines: wild type and abscisic acid-insensitive () with functionally impaired stomata. Transpiration rate in increased linearly with VPD, up to about 2 kPa. Above this, sharply declining transpiration was followed by leaf death. In contrast, wild type showed a steady or slightly declining transpiration rate up to VPD of nearly 7 kPa, and fully recovered photosynthetic function afterward. There were marked differences in discrimination against CO (ΔC) and COO (ΔO) between and wild-type plants. The ΔC indicated that intercellular CO concentrations decreased with VPD in wild-type plants, but not in plants. The ΔO reflected progressive stomatal closure in wild type in response to increasing VPD; however, in , stomata remained open and oxygen atoms of CO continued to exchange with O enriched leaf water. Coupled measurements of ΔO and gas exchange were used to estimate intercellular vapor pressure, In wild-type leaves, there was no evidence of unsaturation of , even at VPD above 6 kPa. In leaves, approached 0.6 times saturation vapor pressure before the precipitous decline in transpiration rate. For wild type, a sensitive stomatal response to increasing VPD was pivotal in preventing unsaturation of In , after taking unsaturation into account, stomatal conductance increased with increasing VPD, consistent with a disabled active response of guard cell osmotic pressure.

摘要

气孔控制着陆生植物叶片的气体交换,因此对植物的生长和生存至关重要。我们研究了两种灰杨()品系(野生型和脱落酸不敏感型)在蒸汽压亏缺(VPD)下的气体交换响应:气孔功能受损。增加,蒸腾速率呈线性增加,直到约 2 kPa。在此之上,蒸腾速率急剧下降,随后叶片死亡。相比之下,野生型表现出稳定或略有下降的蒸腾速率,直至 VPD 接近 7 kPa,之后光合作用功能完全恢复。与野生型植物相比,和野生型植物之间的 CO (ΔC)和 COO (ΔO)的歧视有明显差异。ΔC 表明,在野生型植物中,细胞间 CO 浓度随 VPD 降低,但在植物中没有。ΔO 反映了随着 VPD 的增加,野生型植物中气孔逐渐关闭;然而,在中,气孔仍然开放,CO 的氧原子继续与富含 O 的叶片水进行交换。用 ΔO 和气体交换的耦合测量来估计细胞间蒸汽压,在野生型叶片中,即使 VPD 高于 6 kPa,也没有证据表明不饱和。在叶片中,接近 0.6 倍饱和蒸气压,然后蒸腾速率急剧下降。对于野生型,对增加 VPD 的敏感气孔反应对于防止不饱和至关重要。在中,考虑到不饱和后,气孔导度随 VPD 的增加而增加,这与保卫细胞渗透压力的主动响应失活一致。

相似文献

1
Effect of Vapor Pressure Deficit on Gas Exchange in Wild-Type and Abscisic Acid-Insensitive Plants.水汽压亏缺对野生型和脱落酸不敏感植物气体交换的影响。
Plant Physiol. 2019 Dec;181(4):1573-1586. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00436. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
2
Dry inside: progressive unsaturation within leaves with increasing vapour pressure deficit affects estimation of key leaf gas exchange parameters.内部干燥:随着蒸汽压亏缺增加,叶片内逐渐出现的非饱和状态会影响关键叶片气体交换参数的估算。
New Phytol. 2024 Nov;244(4):1275-1287. doi: 10.1111/nph.20078. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Role of guard-cell ABA in determining steady-state stomatal aperture and prompt vapor-pressure-deficit response.保卫细胞 ABA 在决定稳定的气孔开度和快速蒸汽压亏缺响应中的作用。
Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;281:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Vapour pressure deficit during growth has little impact on genotypic differences of transpiration efficiency at leaf and whole-plant level: an example from Populus nigra L.生长期间的蒸气压亏缺对叶片和整株水平蒸腾效率的基因型差异影响很小:来自黑杨的一个例子。
Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Apr;38(4):670-84. doi: 10.1111/pce.12423. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
Raf-like kinases and receptor-like (pseudo)kinase GHR1 are required for stomatal vapor pressure difference response.Raf 样激酶和受体样(拟)激酶 GHR1 是气孔蒸气压差响应所必需的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 23;118(47). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107280118.
6
Stomatal VPD Response: There Is More to the Story Than ABA.气孔 VPD 响应:ABA 并非唯一因素。
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):851-864. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00912. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Characterizing the breakpoint of stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit in an angiosperm.描述被子植物气孔对水汽压亏缺响应的转折点。
Plant Physiol. 2024 Jan 31;194(2):732-740. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad560.
8
Natural variation in stomatal response to closing stimuli among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions after exposure to low VPD as a tool to recognize the mechanism of disturbed stomatal functioning.拟南芥不同生态型在低蒸汽压亏缺条件下气孔对关闭刺激反应的自然变异作为识别气孔功能紊乱机制的一种工具。
J Exp Bot. 2014 Dec;65(22):6529-42. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru370. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
9
Guard cell photosynthesis is critical for stomatal turgor production, yet does not directly mediate CO2 - and ABA-induced stomatal closing.保卫细胞光合作用对于气孔膨压的产生至关重要,但并不直接介导二氧化碳和脱落酸诱导的气孔关闭。
Plant J. 2015 Aug;83(4):567-81. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12916. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Seasonal change in response of stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit and three phytohormones in three tree species.三种树木对蒸汽压差和三种植物激素的气孔导度的季节变化反应。
Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14(12):1682341. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1682341. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
CAM photosynthesis in Bulnesia retama (Zygophyllaceae), a non-succulent desert shrub from South America.布氏 Retama(蒺藜科)CAM 光合作用,一种来自南美洲的非肉质沙漠灌木。
Ann Bot. 2023 Nov 25;132(4):655-670. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad114.
2
Disentangling the effects of vapor pressure deficit on northern terrestrial vegetation productivity.解析水汽压亏缺对北方陆地植被生产力的影响。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 9;9(32):eadf3166. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3166.
3
Extreme undersaturation in the intercellular airspace of leaves: a failure of Gaastra or Ohm?叶片细胞间隙极度不饱和:是 Gaastra 还是 Ohm 的错?
Ann Bot. 2022 Sep 19;130(3):301-316. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac094.
4
Do H and O in leaf water reflect environmental drivers differently?叶片水中的 H 和 O 是否反映了不同的环境驱动因素?
New Phytol. 2022 Jul;235(1):41-51. doi: 10.1111/nph.18113. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Raf-like kinases and receptor-like (pseudo)kinase GHR1 are required for stomatal vapor pressure difference response.Raf 样激酶和受体样(拟)激酶 GHR1 是气孔蒸气压差响应所必需的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 23;118(47). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107280118.
6
Molecular mechanisms of stomatal closure in response to rising vapour pressure deficit.响应蒸气压亏缺上升而导致气孔关闭的分子机制。
New Phytol. 2021 Oct;232(2):468-475. doi: 10.1111/nph.17592. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress.三种暖季豆科植物在水分胁迫下的生长和生理响应。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 22;10(1):12233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69209-2.
8
Osmotic adjustment and hormonal regulation of stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit in sunflower.向日葵气孔对蒸汽压亏缺响应的渗透调节和激素调控
AoB Plants. 2020 Jun 19;12(4):plaa025. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa025. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Directional change in leaf dry matter δ 13C during leaf development is widespread in C3 plants.在 C3 植物中,叶片发育过程中叶片干物质 δ¹³C 的方向变化是普遍存在的。
Ann Bot. 2020 Oct 30;126(6):981-990. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa114.
10
Keep it Steamy: Improved Quantification of the Humidity within the Leaf.保持湿润:改进对叶片内部湿度的量化
Plant Physiol. 2019 Dec;181(4):1396. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01275.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-Source δO Method to Validate the COO-Photosynthetic Discrimination Model: Implications for Mesophyll Conductance.双源 δO 方法验证 COO-光合作用 discrimination 模型:对叶肉导度的影响。
Plant Physiol. 2019 Nov;181(3):1175-1190. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00633. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
The humidity inside leaves and why you should care: implications of unsaturation of leaf intercellular airspaces.叶片内部的湿度以及你为何应予以关注:叶肉细胞间隙不饱和的影响
Am J Bot. 2019 May;106(5):618-621. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1282. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Thresholds for leaf damage due to dehydration: declines of hydraulic function, stomatal conductance and cellular integrity precede those for photochemistry.叶片因脱水而受损的阈值:水力功能、气孔导度和细胞完整性的下降先于光化学下降。
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):134-149. doi: 10.1111/nph.15779. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Estimating Mesophyll Conductance from Measurements of COO Photosynthetic Discrimination and Carbonic Anhydrase Activity.从 CO2 光合作用 discrimination 和碳酸酐酶活性的测量值估算叶肉导度。
Plant Physiol. 2018 Oct;178(2):728-752. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01031. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Unsaturation of vapour pressure inside leaves of two conifer species.两种针叶树叶片内蒸汽压不饱和。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 16;8(1):7667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25838-2.
6
ABA Transport and Plant Water Stress Responses.ABA 转运与植物水分胁迫响应。
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jun;23(6):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Stomatal Response to Humidity: Blurring the Boundary between Active and Passive Movement.气孔对湿度的响应:模糊主动运动和被动运动之间的界限。
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):485-488. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01699.
8
Stomatal VPD Response: There Is More to the Story Than ABA.气孔 VPD 响应:ABA 并非唯一因素。
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):851-864. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00912. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Stomatal Function across Temporal and Spatial Scales: Deep-Time Trends, Land-Atmosphere Coupling and Global Models.时间和空间尺度上的气孔功能:长时间趋势、地气耦合和全球模型。
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jun;174(2):583-602. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00287. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
The use of stable isotopes to study ecosystem gas exchange.利用稳定同位素研究生态系统气体交换。
Oecologia. 2000 May;123(3):297-311. doi: 10.1007/s004420051016.