• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种暖季豆科植物在水分胁迫下的生长和生理响应。

Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress.

机构信息

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.

USDA-ARS, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, 7207 W. Cheyenne St., El Reno, OK, 73036, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 22;10(1):12233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69209-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-69209-2
PMID:32699333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7376039/
Abstract

Novel drought-tolerant grain legumes like mothbean (Vigna acontifolia), tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius), and guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) may also serve as summer forages, and add resilience to agricultural systems in the Southern Great Plains (SGP). However, limited information on the comparative response of these species to different water regimes prevents identification of the most reliable option. This study was conducted to compare mothbean, tepary bean and guar for their vegetative growth and physiological responses to four different water regimes: 100% (control), and 75%, 50% and 25% of control, applied from 27 to 77 days after planting (DAP). Tepary bean showed the lowest stomatal conductance (g) and photosynthetic rate (A), but also maintained the highest instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) among species at 0.06 and 0.042 m m soil moisture levels. Despite maintaining higher A, rates of vegetative growth by guar and mothbean were lower than tepary bean due to their limited leaf sink activity. At final harvest (77 DAP), biomass yield of tepary bean was 38-60% and 41-56% greater than guar and mothbean, respectively, across water deficits. Tepary bean was the most drought-tolerant legume under greenhouse conditions, and hence future research should focus on evaluating this species in extensive production settings.

摘要

新型抗旱豆类作物,如兵豆(Vigna aconitifolia)、利马豆(Phaseolus acutifolius)和胍(Cyamopsis tetragonoloba),也可用作夏季饲料,并为大平原南部(SGP)的农业系统增加弹性。然而,关于这些物种对不同水分条件的相对反应的信息有限,无法确定最可靠的选择。本研究旨在比较兵豆、利马豆和胍在不同水分条件下的营养生长和生理反应,水分条件分别为:100%(对照)和 75%、50%和 25%,从种植后 27 至 77 天(DAP)开始施加水分。利马豆的气孔导度(g)和光合速率(A)最低,但在 0.06 和 0.042 m m 土壤水分水平下,瞬时水分利用效率(WUE)最高。尽管胍和兵豆的 A 较高,但由于叶片库容量有限,其营养生长速度仍低于利马豆。在最终收获(77 DAP)时,利马豆的生物量产量比胍和兵豆分别高出 38-60%和 41-56%,这是由于水分亏缺造成的。在温室条件下,利马豆是最耐旱的豆科植物,因此未来的研究应集中在评估该物种在广泛的生产环境中的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/213ffd18eb92/41598_2020_69209_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/0a408188682c/41598_2020_69209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/f6b9317085d7/41598_2020_69209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/aa9fc4eba4cf/41598_2020_69209_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/6a3998436622/41598_2020_69209_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/213ffd18eb92/41598_2020_69209_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/0a408188682c/41598_2020_69209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/f6b9317085d7/41598_2020_69209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/aa9fc4eba4cf/41598_2020_69209_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/6a3998436622/41598_2020_69209_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e855/7376039/213ffd18eb92/41598_2020_69209_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress.三种暖季豆科植物在水分胁迫下的生长和生理响应。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 22;10(1):12233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69209-2.
2
Predicting Forage Quality of Warm-Season Legumes by Near Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Techniques.基于近红外光谱技术结合机器学习方法预测暖季豆科牧草品质
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 6;20(3):867. doi: 10.3390/s20030867.
3
Physiological Characteristics of Cultivated Tepary Bean ( A. Gray) and Its Wild Relatives Grown at High Temperature and Acid Soil Stress Conditions in the Amazon Region of Colombia.哥伦比亚亚马逊地区高温和酸性土壤胁迫条件下种植的栽培 tepary 豆(A. Gray)及其野生近缘种的生理特性
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;11(1):116. doi: 10.3390/plants11010116.
4
Effect of cutting management on the forage production and quality of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray).切割管理对刺山柑(Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray)饲用生产和品质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 8;13(1):12875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39550-3.
5
Diversity in stomatal and hydraulic responses to post-flowering drought in common (Phaseolus vulgaris) and tepary (P. acutifolius) beans.普通菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)和尖叶菜豆(P. acutifolius)开花后干旱条件下气孔及水力响应的多样性。
Plant Cell Environ. 2025 Jan;48(1):51-64. doi: 10.1111/pce.15106. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
6
Contrasting Crop Water Use Patterns and Stomatal Dynamics in Response to Terminal Drought.对比作物水分利用模式及气孔动态对末期干旱的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 31;13:894657. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.894657. eCollection 2022.
7
Allelic Diversity at Abiotic Stress Responsive Genes in Relationship to Ecological Drought Indices for Cultivated Tepary Bean, A. Gray, and Its Wild Relatives.非生物胁迫响应基因的等位基因多样性与栽培刺山柑及其野生近缘种的生态干旱指数的关系。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 12;12(4):556. doi: 10.3390/genes12040556.
8
First use of microsatellite markers in a large collection of cultivated and wild accessions of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray).首次在大量栽培和野生的大翼豆(Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray)材料中使用微卫星标记。
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Oct;125(6):1137-47. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1900-0. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
Gene-based SNP discovery in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (P. vulgaris) for diversity analysis and comparative mapping.基于基因的多毛野豌豆(Phaseolus acutifolius)和菜豆(P. vulgaris)单核苷酸多态性发现用于多样性分析和比较作图。
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 15;17:239. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2499-3.
10
Large genomic introgression blocks of Freytag bean into the common bean enhance the crossability between tepary and common beans.弗雷塔格豆(Freytag bean)向普通豆的大量基因组渗入片段增强了 tepary 豆与普通豆之间的杂交亲和性。
Plant Direct. 2022 Dec 13;6(12):e470. doi: 10.1002/pld3.470. eCollection 2022 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Drought Stress Response in Guar ( (L.) Taub): Physiological and Molecular Genetic Aspects.瓜尔豆(Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub)的干旱胁迫响应:生理和分子遗传学方面
Plants (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;12(23):3955. doi: 10.3390/plants12233955.
2
Effect of cutting management on the forage production and quality of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray).切割管理对刺山柑(Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray)饲用生产和品质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 8;13(1):12875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39550-3.
3
Contrasting Crop Water Use Patterns and Stomatal Dynamics in Response to Terminal Drought.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Vapor Pressure Deficit on Gas Exchange in Wild-Type and Abscisic Acid-Insensitive Plants.水汽压亏缺对野生型和脱落酸不敏感植物气体交换的影响。
Plant Physiol. 2019 Dec;181(4):1573-1586. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00436. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
2
Physiological parameters and protective energy dissipation mechanisms expressed in the leaves of two Vitis vinifera L. genotypes under multiple summer stresses.两种酿酒葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)基因型叶片在多种夏季胁迫下表达的生理参数及保护能量耗散机制
J Plant Physiol. 2015 Aug 1;185:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
3
Regulation of Photosynthesis during Abiotic Stress-Induced Photoinhibition.
对比作物水分利用模式及气孔动态对末期干旱的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 31;13:894657. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.894657. eCollection 2022.
4
Cowpea Physiological Responses to Terminal Drought-Comparison between Four Landraces and a Commercial Variety.豇豆对终末期干旱的生理响应——四个地方品种与一个商业品种的比较
Plants (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;11(5):593. doi: 10.3390/plants11050593.
5
Physiological Characteristics of Cultivated Tepary Bean ( A. Gray) and Its Wild Relatives Grown at High Temperature and Acid Soil Stress Conditions in the Amazon Region of Colombia.哥伦比亚亚马逊地区高温和酸性土壤胁迫条件下种植的栽培 tepary 豆(A. Gray)及其野生近缘种的生理特性
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;11(1):116. doi: 10.3390/plants11010116.
非生物胁迫诱导光抑制过程中光合作用的调节。
Mol Plant. 2015 Sep;8(9):1304-20. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 19.
4
Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) under drought.干旱胁迫下豇豆(Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)光合作用、荧光、气孔导度和水分利用效率的调控。
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011 Oct 5;105(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
5
Water deficit and growth. Co-ordinating processes without an orchestrator?水分亏缺与生长。没有指挥者协调过程?
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011 Jun;14(3):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
6
Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs.水分亏缺使生长与光合作用解偶联,增加 C 含量,并改变库器官中 C 与生长之间的关系。
J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(6):1715-29. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq438. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
7
Comparative Water Relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray.菜豆属 Phaseolus vulgaris L. 和兵豆属 Phaseolus acutifolius Gray 的水分关系比较。
Plant Physiol. 1985 Jan;77(1):113-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.1.113.
8
Osmotic regulation in leaves and roots of olive trees during a water deficit and rewatering.水分亏缺和复水期间橄榄树叶片和根系的渗透调节
Tree Physiol. 2006 Feb;26(2):179-85. doi: 10.1093/treephys/26.2.179.
9
Beef cattle growing and backgrounding programs.肉牛育肥和育成计划。
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2003 Jul;19(2):365-85, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(03)00032-x.
10
Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci.干旱期间细胞间二氧化碳浓度(ci)变化的动态及最低功能ci的测定
Plant Physiol. 1996 May;111(1):179-185. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.1.179.