Butler David, Ward Sarah, Sweetapple Chris, Astaraie-Imani Maryam, Diao Kegong, Farmani Raziyeh, Fu Guangtao
Centre for Water Systems, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Department of Engineering and the Built Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford UK.
Glob Chall. 2016 Jun 17;1(1):63-77. doi: 10.1002/gch2.1010. eCollection 2017 Jan.
Global threats such as climate change, population growth, and rapid urbanization pose a huge future challenge to water management, and, to ensure the ongoing reliability, resilience and sustainability of service provision, a paradigm shift is required. This paper presents an overarching framework that supports the development of strategies for reliable provision of services while explicitly addressing the need for greater resilience to emerging threats, leading to more sustainable solutions. The framework logically relates global threats, the water system (in its broadest sense), impacts on system performance, and social, economic, and environmental consequences. It identifies multiple opportunities for intervention, illustrating how mitigation, adaptation, coping, and learning each address different elements of the framework. This provides greater clarity to decision makers and will enable better informed choices to be made. The framework facilitates four types of analysis and evaluation to support the development of reliable, resilient, and sustainable solutions: "top-down," "bottom-up," "middle based," and "circular" and provides a clear, visual representation of how/when each may be used. In particular, the potential benefits of a middle-based analysis, which focuses on system failure modes and their impacts and enables the effects of unknown threats to be accounted for, are highlighted. The disparate themes of reliability, resilience and sustainability are also logically integrated and their relationships explored in terms of properties and performance. Although these latter two terms are often conflated in resilience and sustainability metrics, the argument is made in this work that the performance of a reliable, resilient, or sustainable system must be distinguished from the properties that enable this performance to be achieved.
气候变化、人口增长和快速城市化等全球性威胁给水资源管理带来了巨大的未来挑战,为确保服务供应的持续可靠性、恢复力和可持续性,需要进行范式转变。本文提出了一个总体框架,该框架支持制定可靠的服务供应战略,同时明确应对应对新出现威胁所需的更强恢复力,从而实现更可持续的解决方案。该框架在逻辑上关联了全球威胁、水系统(最广义的)、对系统性能的影响以及社会、经济和环境后果。它确定了多个干预机会,说明了缓解、适应、应对和学习如何分别处理框架的不同要素。这为决策者提供了更清晰的思路,有助于做出更明智的选择。该框架有助于进行四种类型的分析和评估,以支持制定可靠、有恢复力和可持续的解决方案:“自上而下”、“自下而上”、“基于中间”和“循环”,并清晰直观地展示了每种方法的使用方式/时机。特别是,强调了基于中间分析的潜在好处,该分析侧重于系统故障模式及其影响,并能够考虑未知威胁的影响。可靠性、恢复力和可持续性这些不同的主题也在逻辑上进行了整合,并从属性和性能方面探讨了它们之间的关系。尽管后两个术语在恢复力和可持续性指标中经常混淆,但本文认为,可靠、有恢复力或可持续系统的性能必须与实现这种性能的属性区分开来。