• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良事件的披露:临床医生指南

Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians.

作者信息

Peterson Kimberly A, Rutherford Mary, Drvol Denise, Barkman Darlene, Phipps Amber R, Hales Roberta, Dawson Aaron, Stevens Laurie, Teman Susan, Teets Jeanette

机构信息

Children's Hospital & Medical Center, Omaha, NE.

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA.

出版信息

Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Jun 27;4(4):e185. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185
PMID:31572887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708654/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children's Hospitals' Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) acknowledged a recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics to develop education programs on the communication of adverse events with patients and families. SPS set out to create a guide that would outline a standardized disclosure process and provide a training curriculum and tools so that providers would feel better prepared to have effective disclosure conversations.

METHODS

SPS disclosure work began with the development of a project team made up of 9 network hospitals. The team utilized key driver diagrams and process maps to show the relationship between the project aims, key drivers, and specific interventions. The team developed a training curriculum, guide, and tools for each area of improvement. To ensure these were effective, they were tested using case studies and plan-do-study-act cycles.

RESULTS

One of the cohort hospitals piloted the curriculum and tools, training 48 physicians, nurses, executives, and other allied health professionals. Pretest to posttest scores improved from an average of 82.7% to 90.2%. Survey feedback was favorable with 100% of respondents noting that they strongly agree or agree that attending this educational activity increased or improved their competency, performance, and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial testing suggests that the developed curriculum is empowering for frontline clinicians. Materials are available in an electronic format on the SPS external website. As member hospitals implement these materials, they will be evaluating learner satisfaction and provider usage. SPS will seek out feedback from these hospitals to further develop the materials and support clinicians.

摘要

引言

儿童医院患者安全解决方案(SPS)认可了美国儿科学会的一项建议,即开发关于向患者及其家属通报不良事件的教育项目。SPS着手创建一份指南,该指南将概述标准化的披露流程,并提供培训课程和工具,以便医疗服务提供者能更好地准备好进行有效的披露对话。

方法

SPS的披露工作始于组建一个由9家网络医院组成的项目团队。该团队利用关键驱动因素图和流程图来展示项目目标、关键驱动因素和具体干预措施之间的关系。该团队为每个改进领域开发了培训课程、指南和工具。为确保这些有效,通过案例研究和计划-执行-研究-改进循环对其进行了测试。

结果

其中一家队列医院试用了该课程和工具,培训了48名医生、护士、管理人员和其他相关健康专业人员。前测到后测的分数从平均82.7%提高到了90.2%。调查反馈良好,100%的受访者表示他们强烈同意或同意参加这项教育活动提高或改善了他们的能力、表现和患者治疗效果。

结论

初步测试表明,所开发的课程对一线临床医生有帮助。这些材料可在SPS外部网站上以电子格式获取。随着成员医院实施这些材料,他们将评估学习者的满意度和医疗服务提供者的使用情况。SPS将寻求这些医院的反馈,以进一步完善这些材料并支持临床医生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/06e2fdd57f8e/pqs-4-e185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/388e7fec8d95/pqs-4-e185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/6b7c8152c8b4/pqs-4-e185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/6510c89dace8/pqs-4-e185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/06e2fdd57f8e/pqs-4-e185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/388e7fec8d95/pqs-4-e185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/6b7c8152c8b4/pqs-4-e185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/6510c89dace8/pqs-4-e185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/6708654/06e2fdd57f8e/pqs-4-e185-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians.不良事件的披露:临床医生指南
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Jun 27;4(4):e185. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
We Will Not Compete on Safety: How Children's Hospitals Have Come Together to Hasten Harm Reduction.我们不会在安全方面展开竞争:儿童医院如何携手加速减少伤害。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jul;44(7):377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
9
Talk the Talk: Implementing a Communication Curriculum for Surgical Residents.畅所欲言:为外科住院医师实施沟通课程
J Surg Educ. 2017 Mar-Apr;74(2):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
The Community Pediatrics Training Initiative Project Planning Tool: A Practical Approach to Community-Based Advocacy.社区儿科培训倡议项目规划工具:基于社区宣传的实用方法
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Sep 18;13:10630. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10630.

引用本文的文献

1
Final-year medical students' reflections on types of significant events in primary care.医学生对初级保健中重大事件类型的反思。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023 Nov 1;15(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.4099.

本文引用的文献

1
Children's Hospitals' Solutions for Patient Safety Collaborative Impact on Hospital-Acquired Harm.儿童医院患者安全协作解决方案对医院获得性伤害的影响
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3494. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
Disclosure of Adverse Events in Pediatrics.
Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3215.
3
Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement.美国和加拿大不良事件的披露:最新情况及改进建议框架
J Public Health Res. 2013 Dec 1;2(3):e32. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2013.e32.
4
Radiology trainees' comfort with difficult conversations and attitudes about error disclosure: effect of a communication skills workshop.放射科住院医师在应对困难对话时的舒适度以及对错误披露的态度:沟通技能研讨会的影响
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(8):781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors.患者和医生对医疗差错披露的态度。
JAMA. 2003 Feb 26;289(8):1001-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.8.1001.