• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COLOR III 中的手术质量保证:一项随机对照试验中的标准化和能力评估。

Surgical Quality Assurance in COLOR III: Standardization and Competency Assessment in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United kingdom.

Depatment of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, United kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):768-774. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003537.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003537
PMID:31573984
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop an objective and reliable surgical quality assurance system (SQA) for COLOR III, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND OF SUMMARY DATA

SQA influences outcome measures in RCTs such as lymph nodes harvest, in-hospital mortality, and locoregional cancer recurrence. However, levels of SQA are variable.

METHOD

Hierarchical task analysis of TaTME was performed. A 4-round Delphi methodology was applied for standardization of TaTME steps. Semistructured interviews were conducted in round 1 to identify key steps and tasks, which were rated as mandatory, optional, or prohibited in rounds 2 to 4 using questionnaires. Competency assessment tool (CAT) was developed and its content validity was examined by expert surgeons. Twenty unedited videos were assessed to test reliability using generalizability theory.

RESULTS

Eighty-three of 101 surgical tasks identified reached 70% agreement (26 mandatory, 56 optional, and 1 prohibited). An operative guide of standardized TaTME was created. CAT is matrix of 9 steps and 4 performance qualities: exposure, execution, adverse event, and end-product. The overall G-coefficient was 0.883. Inter-rater and interitem reliability were 0.883 and 0.986. To enter COLOR III, 2 unedited TaTME and 1 laparoscopic TME videos were submitted and assessed by 2 independent assessors using CAT.

CONCLUSION

We described an iterative approach to develop an objective SQA within multicenter RCT. This approach provided standardization, the development of reliable and valid CAT, and the criteria for trial entry and monitoring surgical performance during the trial.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为 COLOR III 建立一个客观可靠的手术质量保证系统(SQA),该系统是一项国际多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的效果。

背景概述

SQA 会影响 RCT 的结果测量指标,如淋巴结采集、住院死亡率和局部癌症复发。然而,SQA 的水平存在差异。

方法

对 TaTME 进行层次任务分析。采用四轮 Delphi 方法对 TaTME 步骤进行标准化。在第一轮中进行半结构化访谈,以确定关键步骤和任务,并在第二轮至第四轮中使用问卷将其评定为强制性、选择性或禁止性。开发了能力评估工具(CAT),并由专家外科医生对其内容有效性进行了检验。使用概化理论对 20 个未经编辑的视频进行评估,以测试可靠性。

结果

确定的 101 个手术任务中有 83 个达到了 70%的一致性(26 个强制性、56 个选择性和 1 个禁止性)。创建了标准化 TaTME 的手术指南。CAT 是一个 9 个步骤和 4 个绩效质量的矩阵:暴露、执行、不良事件和最终产品。总体 G 系数为 0.883。组内和组间可靠性分别为 0.883 和 0.986。为了参加 COLOR III,提交了 2 个未经编辑的 TaTME 和 1 个腹腔镜 TME 视频,并由 2 名独立评估员使用 CAT 进行评估。

结论

我们描述了一种在多中心 RCT 中开发客观 SQA 的迭代方法。该方法提供了标准化、可靠和有效的 CAT 的开发,以及试验准入标准和监测试验期间手术绩效的标准。

相似文献

1
Surgical Quality Assurance in COLOR III: Standardization and Competency Assessment in a Randomized Controlled Trial.COLOR III 中的手术质量保证:一项随机对照试验中的标准化和能力评估。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):768-774. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003537.
2
Outcomes of a Single Surgeon-Based Transanal-Total Mesorectal Excision (TATME) for Rectal Cancer.基于单外科医生的经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TATME)治疗直肠癌的疗效
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2018 Dec;49(4):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-9989-7.
3
Predictive Factors and Risk Model for Positive Circumferential Resection Margin Rate After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in 2653 Patients With Rectal Cancer.直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术 2653 例环周切缘阳性率的预测因素和风险模型。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):884-891. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003516.
4
An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).国际多中心前瞻性直肠癌手术审计;手术方法与结果,包括经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20 Suppl 6:33-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.14376.
5
Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术真的安全且优于经会阴入路腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术吗?68 例患者的病例匹配研究学习曲线。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;20(6):O143-O151. doi: 10.1111/codi.14238. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的效果:与腹腔镜和开放手术短期结局的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2312-2321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5926-x. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer.COLOR III:一项比较经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的多中心随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
Simple instruments facilitating achievement of transanal total mesorectal excision in male patients.便于男性患者经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的简单器械。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 21;23(31):5798-5808. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5798.
9
Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision.低位直肠肿瘤切除术后的功能结局:经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的比较
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4.
10
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:一条培训路径。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4680-1. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance on the Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer: An Umbrella Review.直肠癌手术管理指南:一项伞状综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;15(6):955. doi: 10.3390/life15060955.
2
Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study).全国范围内微创右半结肠癌切除术的标准化及基于视频的能力评估工具的开发和验证(RIGHT 研究)。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad404.
3
Crowd-sourced and expert video assessment in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
微创食管切除术的众包和专家视频评估。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7819-7828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10297-2. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).全国范围内实施优化的标准化右半结肠癌技术:一项干预性序贯队列研究(Right 研究)方案。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02801-6. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision port-assisted perineal hernia repair: A case report.经肛门全直肠系膜切除辅助端口会阴疝修补术:一例报告。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;12:1036145. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1036145. eCollection 2022.
7
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: it's come a long way and here to stay.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:它已经取得了长足的进步并将持续存在。
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;38(4):283-289. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00374.0053. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
8
Structured training curriculums for transanal total mesorectal excision in China: refinement is needed.中国经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的结构化培训课程:仍需完善。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Apr;10(8):489. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1693.
9
Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术虚拟知识评估工具的开发与评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02621-0. Epub 2022 May 3.
10
The learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with local recurrence: results from a multicentre external audit.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的学习曲线与局部复发相关:来自多中心外部审核的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;23(8):2020-2029. doi: 10.1111/codi.15722. Epub 2021 Jun 9.