• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术虚拟知识评估工具的开发与评估。

Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision.

机构信息

The Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

The University Health Network - Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02621-0. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-022-02621-0
PMID:35503143
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TATME) is difficult to learn and can result in serious complications. Current paradigms for assessing performance and competency may be insufficient. This study aims to develop and provide preliminary validity evidence for a TATME virtual assessment tool (TATME-VAT) to assess the cognitive skills necessary to safely complete TATME dissection.

METHODS

Participants from North America, Europe, Japan and China completed the test via an interactive online platform between 11/2019 and 05/2020. They were grouped into expert, experienced and novice surgeons depending on the number of independently performed TATMEs. TATME-VAT is a 24-item web-based assessment evaluating advanced cognitive skills, designed according to a blueprint from consensus guidelines. Eight items were multiple choice questions. Sixteen items required making annotations on still frames of TATME videos (VCT) and were scored using a validated algorithm derived from experts' responses. Annotation (range 0-100), multiple choice (range 0-100), and overall scores (sum of annotation and multiple-choice scores, normalized to μ = 50 and σ = 10) were reported.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the expert, experienced, and novice groups for the annotation (p < 0.001), multiple-choice (p < 0.001), and overall scores (p < 0.001). The annotation (p = 0.439) and overall (p = 0.152) scores were similar between the experienced and novice groups. Annotation scores were higher in participants with 51 or more vs. 30-50 vs. less than 30 cases. Scores were also lower in users with a self-reported recent complication vs. those without.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the development of an interactive video-based virtual assessment tool for TATME dissection and provides initial validity evidence for its use.

摘要

背景

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TATME)较难学习,可能导致严重并发症。目前评估表现和能力的模式可能不够充分。本研究旨在开发并初步验证一种 TATME 虚拟评估工具(TATME-VAT),以评估安全完成 TATME 解剖所需的认知技能。

方法

2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 5 月,来自北美、欧洲、日本和中国的参与者通过互动在线平台完成了测试。他们根据独立完成的 TATME 数量分为专家、经验丰富和新手外科医生。TATME-VAT 是一个 24 项的基于网络的评估,评估高级认知技能,根据共识指南的蓝图设计。8 项为多项选择题。16 项要求对 TATME 视频(VCT)的静态帧进行注释,并使用从专家回答中得出的经过验证的算法进行评分。注释(范围 0-100)、多项选择(范围 0-100)和总分(注释和多项选择得分的总和,归一化为μ=50,σ=10)报告。

结果

在注释(p<0.001)、多项选择(p<0.001)和总分(p<0.001)方面,专家、经验丰富和新手组之间存在显著差异。注释(p=0.439)和总分(p=0.152)在经验丰富和新手组之间相似。注释分数在完成 51 例或更多病例的参与者中较高,在完成 30-50 例和少于 30 例病例的参与者中较低。报告近期并发症的用户分数也较低。

结论

本研究描述了一种用于 TATME 解剖的交互式视频虚拟评估工具的开发,并为其使用提供了初步有效性证据。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术虚拟知识评估工具的开发与评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02621-0. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review.总结经肛门全直肠系膜切除术能力的衡量标准:系统综述。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4817-4824. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07935-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
[Comparative study of functional prognosis of transanal total mesorectal excision and conventional total mesorectal excision based on propensity score matching].基于倾向评分匹配的经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与传统全直肠系膜切除术功能预后的比较研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 1;58(8):619-625. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200330-00267.
4
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:超越学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4101-4109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07172-4. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:一条培训路径。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4680-1. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision.低位直肠肿瘤切除术后的功能结局:经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的比较
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4.
8
Development of a formative feedback tool for transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术形成性反馈工具的开发。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6705-6711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08943-8. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Transanal total mesorectal excision and low anterior resection syndrome.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与低位前切除综合征。
Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):991-997. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab056.
10
Development of a performance rubric for transanal endoscopic rectal purse-string sutures.经肛门内镜直肠荷包缝合术操作评分表的制定。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):109-115. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02545-1. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review.基于专业知识的外科试验设计:叙述性综述。
Can J Surg. 2021 Nov 10;64(6):E594-E602. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008520. Print 2021 Nov-Dec.
2
Surveys in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Reporting Guideline.外科教育调查:系统评价和报告指南。
Eur Surg Res. 2021;62(2):61-67. doi: 10.1159/000516125. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Author response to: TaTME and the worse oncological outcome - new data demonstrates a difficult method.
Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):e612. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11849. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review.总结经肛门全直肠系膜切除术能力的衡量标准:系统综述。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4817-4824. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07935-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会建议对经肛门全直肠系膜切除术进行反思。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;22(7):745-748. doi: 10.1111/codi.15143.
6
Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery: A Systematic Review.全球手术患者和医护人员调查应答率概述:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e75-e81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078.
7
Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery.手术技能评估与癌症手术临床结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):590-598. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004.
8
Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.局部区域性复发后经肛门全直肠系膜切除术直肠癌实施过程中。
Br J Surg. 2020 Aug;107(9):1211-1220. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11525. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
9
Experience beyond the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and its effect on the incidence of anastomotic leak.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)学习曲线之外的经验及其对吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Apr;24(4):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02160-6. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.挪威暂停经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):121-130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459. Epub 2019 Dec 5.