Suppr超能文献

光照疗法治疗季节性情感障碍的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The Efficacy of Light Therapy in the Treatment of Seasonal Affective Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Competence Center for Eating Behavior, Obesity and the Psyche, Zofingen Hospital, Zofingen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(1):17-24. doi: 10.1159/000502891. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bright light therapy (BLT) has been used as a treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD) for over 30 years. This meta-analysis was aimed to assess the efficacy of BLT in the treatment of SAD in adults.

METHOD

We performed a systematic literature search including randomized, single- or double-blind clinical trials investigating BLT (≥1,000 lx, light box or light visor) against dim light (≤400 lx) or sham/low-density negative ion generators as placebo. Only first-period data were used from crossover trials. The primary outcome was the post-treatment depression score measured by validated scales, and the secondary outcome was the rate of response to treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies finally met our predefined inclusion criteria. BLT was superior over placebo with a standardized mean difference of -0.37 (95% CI: -0.63 to -0.12) for depression ratings (18 studies, 610 patients) and a risk ratio of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.08-1.85) for response to active treatment (16 studies, 559 patients). We found no evidence for a publication bias, but moderate heterogeneity of the studies and a moderate-to-high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

BLT can be regarded as an effective treatment for SAD, but the available evidence stems from methodologically heterogeneous studies with small-to-medium sample sizes, necessitating larger high-quality clinical trials.

摘要

背景

光疗(BLT)已被用作治疗季节性情感障碍(SAD)超过 30 年。本荟萃分析旨在评估 BLT 治疗成人 SAD 的疗效。

方法

我们进行了系统的文献检索,包括随机、单盲或双盲临床试验,研究 BLT(≥1000 lx,光箱或光面罩)与暗光灯(≤400 lx)或假/低浓度负离子发生器作为安慰剂的比较。仅从交叉试验中使用第一期数据。主要结局是使用经过验证的量表测量治疗后的抑郁评分,次要结局是治疗反应率。

结果

共有 19 项研究最终符合我们预先设定的纳入标准。BLT 在治疗 SAD 方面优于安慰剂,抑郁评分的标准化均数差为-0.37(95%CI:-0.63 至-0.12)(18 项研究,610 名患者),对活性治疗的反应率风险比为 1.42(95%CI:1.08-1.85)(16 项研究,559 名患者)。我们没有发现发表偏倚的证据,但研究存在中度异质性和中度至高度偏倚风险。

结论

BLT 可以被视为治疗 SAD 的有效方法,但现有证据来自方法学上存在差异、样本量较小的研究,需要更大规模、高质量的临床试验来进一步验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验