Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 21;14:288. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0288-6.
Bright light treatment is effective for seasonal affective disorder (SAD), although the mechanisms of action are still unknown. We investigated whether transcranial bright light via the ear canals has an antidepressant effect in the treatment of SAD.
During the four-week study period, 89 patients (67 females; 22 males, aged 22-65, mean ± SD age: 43.2 ± 10.9 years) suffering from SAD were randomized to receive a 12-min daily dose of photic energy of one of three intensities (1 lumen/0.72 mW/cm(2); 4 lumens/2.881 mW/cm(2); 9 lumens/6.482 mW/cm(2)) via the ear canals. The light was produced using light-emitting diodes. The severity of depressive symptoms was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder (SIGH-SAD), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Cognitive performance was measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT). The within-group and between-group changes in these variables throughout the study were analysed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas gender differences at baseline within the light groups were analysed using Student's t-tests.
Patients in all three groups showed significant decreases in their BDI, HAMA, and SIGH-SAD scores. Response rates, i.e., an at least 50% decrease of symptoms as measured by the BDI, were 74%-79% in the three treatment groups. Corresponding variations for the SIGH-SAD and the HAMA were 35-45% and 47-62%, respectively. No intensity-based dose-response relationships in the improvement of anxiety and depressive symptoms or cognitive performance between treatment groups were observed. Approximately one in four patients experienced mild adverse effects, of which the most common were headache, insomnia, and nausea.
These results suggests that transcranial bright light treatment may have antidepressant and anxiolytic effect in SAD patients, as both self- and psychiatrist-rated depressive and anxiety symptoms decreased in all treatment groups. These improvements are comparable to findings of earlier bright light studies that used conventional devices. The lack of dose response may be due to a saturation effect above a certain light intensity threshold. Further studies on the effects of transcranial bright light with an adequate placebo condition are needed.
NCT01293409, ClinicalTrials.gov.
光疗对季节性情感障碍(SAD)有效,但其作用机制尚不清楚。我们研究了经耳道的经颅强光治疗是否对 SAD 有抗抑郁作用。
在四周的研究期间,89 名(67 名女性;22 名男性,年龄 22-65 岁,平均年龄 ± 标准差:43.2 ± 10.9 岁)患有 SAD 的患者被随机分为三组,接受每天 12 分钟的不同强度的光能量照射:1 流明/0.72 毫瓦/平方厘米;4 流明/2.881 毫瓦/平方厘米;9 流明/6.482 毫瓦/平方厘米。光由发光二极管产生。使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表-季节性情感障碍(SIGH-SAD)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAMA)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估抑郁症状的严重程度。认知表现通过连线测试(TMT)进行测量。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)分析研究期间这些变量的组内和组间变化,而光组内的性别差异则使用学生 t 检验进行分析。
所有三组患者的 BDI、HAMA 和 SIGH-SAD 评分均显著下降。以 BDI 测量的症状至少减轻 50%的反应率为 74%-79%,三组治疗组均有。SIGH-SAD 和 HAMA 的相应变化分别为 35-45%和 47-62%。治疗组之间在焦虑和抑郁症状或认知表现的改善方面没有观察到基于强度的剂量反应关系。约四分之一的患者出现轻度不良反应,其中最常见的是头痛、失眠和恶心。
这些结果表明,经颅强光治疗可能对 SAD 患者有抗抑郁和抗焦虑作用,因为所有治疗组的自我和精神科评定的抑郁和焦虑症状均有所改善。这些改善与使用传统设备的早期强光研究结果相当。缺乏剂量反应可能是由于超过一定光强阈值的饱和效应所致。需要进一步研究经颅强光的影响,并进行适当的安慰剂对照试验。
NCT01293409,ClinicalTrials.gov。